Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

iAssist vs. Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Persona Knee System Among Patients With BMI>=30: Radiographic, Clinical and Economic Outcomes

16 april 2014 uppdaterad av: Hadassah Medical Organization
The purpose of this prospective randomized study is to evaluate iAssist with respect to radiographic, clinical and economic outcomes in comparison to conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty using the Persona knee system among patients with BMI>=30.

Studieöversikt

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Förväntat)

60

Fas

  • Fas 2

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år till 85 år (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female
  2. Needs a primary TKR on the left or right knee
  3. Diagnose of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (e.g., osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, etc.)
  4. Over 18 years old
  5. BMI>=30
  6. Able to:

    • Understand what participation in the study entails and give written informed consent, and
    • Follow surgeon/staff instructions, and
    • Return for all follow-up evaluations, and
    • Able and willing to undergo a preoperative full-leg, standing radiographs (all cases)
    • Willing to consent (patient or his/her legal guardian) to participate in the study by signing and dating an approved consent.
    • Meet an acceptable preoperative medical clearance and is free of or treated for cardiac, pulmonary, hematological or other conditions that would pose excessive operative risk.
  7. Presence of varus or valgus deformity of 15 degrees or less.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently enrolled in an investigational new drug or device study
  2. Active Infection (including septic knee, distant infection, or osteomyelitis)
  3. Severe hip arthrosis
  4. Neurological disorders (including, but not limited to Parkinson's disease)
  5. Prior ipsilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, TKA, knee fusion or patellectomy
  6. Hip or knee ankylosis
  7. Inflammatory joint disease.
  8. Either rheumatoid or post-traumatic knee arthritis
  9. Scheduled for simultaneous bilateral TKA
  10. Indications of intra- and/or extra-articular deformations that would eliminate or tend to eliminate adequate implant support or prevent the use of an appropriately sized implant, such as polio, history of tibial plateau fracture, etc.
  11. Any metal within 150 mm of the joint line for the operative-side knee
  12. Knee deformities greater than 15 degrees of fixed varus, valgus, or flexion contracture on initial physical examination
  13. A female who is pregnant or lactating
  14. Current involvement in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensation claims
  15. Arterial disease or stents that would exclude the use of a tourniquet
  16. Insufficient quality or quantity of bone to support the implant due to prior knee surgery (or surgeries), cancer, metabolic bone disease, osteoporosis/osteopenia (diagnosed or treated with medication), active/old/remote infection, etc.
  17. Mental condition that may interfere with his/her ability to give an informed consent or interfere with his/her ability or willingness to fulfill the requirements of the study.
  18. Condition that would place excessive demands on the implant (e.g., Charcot's joints, muscle deficiencies, multiple joint disabilities, skeletal immaturity, etc.).
  19. Collateral ligament insufficiency.
  20. Immunosuppressive disorder (e.g., AIDS, etc.) that would require cytotoxic drugs, corticosteroids, large dose of irradiation, or antilymphocytic serum.
  21. An existing condition that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise participation or follow-up in this study

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Conventional Technique using Persona prosthesis
The surgeon will realize the implantation of the Persona prosthesis according to the surgical technique. Potential variables such as methodology for determining tibial rotation, measuring of bone cuts, and any intra-operative adjustments will be captured on the operative case report form.
Experimentell: iAssist Technique using Persona prosthesis
iAssist is an electronic displacement sensor based instrumentation system that provides intra-operative verification at each surgical step (bone cuts alignment and resection level); in order to help reduce bone cuts errors. iAssist features simple and intuitive instrumentation that is based on conventional total knee arthroplasty instrumentation. iAssist should take less than 2-3 minutes (on average) to setup

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
differences in limb alignment
Tidsram: 12 MONTHS
The primary endpoint is defined as Limb alignment as determined using radiographs (A/P long-standing and lateral films)
12 MONTHS

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
difference in Knee Society Score
Tidsram: 12 MONTHS
Assess the differences in Knee Society Score between iAssist and conventional instrumentation in primary TKA procedures.
12 MONTHS

Andra resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
difference in Oxford knee score
Tidsram: 12 months
Assess the differences inOxford knee score between iAssist and conventional instrumentation in primary TKA procedures.
12 months
Operating room time
Tidsram: three hours
to compare the operating room time between patients undergoing iAssist vs. conventional instrumentation in primary TKA procedures.
three hours
Blood loss and complications
Tidsram: 12 months
to compare the blood loss and complications between patients undergoing iAssist vs. conventional instrumentation in primary TKA procedures
12 months

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart

1 juni 2014

Primärt slutförande (Förväntat)

1 juni 2016

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

26 februari 2014

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

16 april 2014

Första postat (Uppskatta)

21 april 2014

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Uppskatta)

21 april 2014

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

16 april 2014

Senast verifierad

1 februari 2014

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • 0092-13-HMO

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera