Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Pain-at-Work Toolkit (Definitive Trial)

1 september 2026 uppdaterad av: University of Nottingham

Pain-at-Work Toolkit for Employees With Chronic Pain (Definitive Trial)

The Pain-at-Work Toolkit has been created together with people who live with chronic pain, employers, healthcare professionals, and a national pain charity. The aim of the toolkit is to help employees with ongoing pain feel more confident in managing their condition at work, know where to find support, and improve their workplace experience, so they can remain in the workforce. People with lived experience of chronic pain will help guide the project throughout, including reviewing study documents and helping choose what outcomes to measure.

The investigators will work with at least 30 organisations from different types of workplaces in the UK and invite more than 600 employees who live with pain to take part in the study. Organisations' employees will either receive access to the Pain-at-Work Toolkit and the Pain-at-Work Managers Toolkit ( to help managers support their staff) or the usual care that their organisation offers. Participants will be asked to complete online surveys at three points during the study. Intervention participants may be asked to take part in an interview at the end of the study to find out more about their experiences.

The study will examine whether the toolkit improves people's experience of work, including their productivity and ability to remain productive in their jobs. The investigators will also explore whether the toolkit offers good value for money.

Finally, the investigators will examine how the toolkit is used in practice-what works well, what might need improving, and how it could be made available to more employees in the future. The investigators will do this by interviewing employers or stakeholders involved in the employment of, support for, or policy development for adults with chronic pain.

Studieöversikt

Detaljerad beskrivning

Background Chronic pain affects 28 million adults in the UK, significantly impacting their ability to be productive at work, feel fulfilled at work and/or remain in the active workforce. However, most people living with chronic pain cannot access work-related support from healthcare services, and the majority of employers do not routinely provide it. The Pain-at-Work Toolkit is a web-based resource that could help to reduce unfair differences in working lives for people with chronic pain, and positively impact their health and wellbeing, enhancing their productivity in the wider community. Co-created with people who live with pain, healthcare professionals and employers, this toolkit provides education and self-management advice to help people with chronic pain stay in, and thrive, at work.

The investigators tested the Pain-at-Work Toolkit in a preliminary trial in England ('feasibility trial' NCT05838677) . This showed that the Pain-at-Work Toolkit can be a very helpful support tool in the workplace for those living with chronic pain. The investigators recruited 18 organisations and 380 employees (50% and 217% more than expected, respectively), demonstrating that this toolkit meets a gap in employer provisions. Employees who received access to the toolkit valued its content and engaged with it without technical issues. Workers told investigators that their ability to work had improved after 6 months but these results need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Employers told investigators that they valued being able to offer it to their staff. The investigators are now updating the toolkit content to ensure it is relevant to employees across the UK.

The next step is to carry out a larger UK-wide study ('definitive trial'). The aim is to find out whether The Pain-at-Work Toolkit helps people to feel more able and confident at work, take fewer sick days, and be productive at work, and whether it provides good value for money.

The investigators will recruit at least 30 different organisations from across UK. These organisations will be randomly placed into one of two groups: one will access and use the Pain-at-Work Toolkit (the intervention group), and the other will continue as usual (the control group), to compare results fairly. A Pain-at-Work Manager Toolkit will be made available to line managers of organisations in the intervention group.

Over 600 employees will be recruited from these organisations. They will all be invited to complete online questionnaires at three time points: at recruitment, 3 months, and 6 months. The investigators will ask about their health and wellbeing, and factors relating to work, such as work ability, self-efficacy (confidence), sickness absence, work productivity, and intentions to leave.

This larger trial will include an 'implementation study'. This will involve conducting interviews with up to 60 people who have taken part in the trial and other stakeholders (such as employer representatives, line managers, HR or occupational health specialists, policymakers, professional bodies). The findings will shape our plans to make the Pain-at-Work Toolkit available widely to all workers with pain in the future.

Aims The aim of this study is to conduct a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial, with a built-in process and implementation evaluation, to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Pain at Work Toolkit for improving work ability in working-age adults with chronic pain across a range of UK workplaces.

  • To determine the effectiveness of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit for improving work ability in working-age adults with chronic pain
  • To determine intervention fidelity.
  • To explore the relationship between implementation fidelity and outcomes.
  • To understand the barriers and facilitators to successful implementation and rollout.
  • To generate strategies for future implementation, maintenance, and scalability.

Protocol/ Method

The study consists of 3 work packages:

  • Effectiveness trial (WP1),
  • Health economic evaluation (WP2),
  • Process and implementation evaluation (WP3).

Setting is community, comprised of employment settings in different sectors (public, private, third) in UK, varying in size (small:10-49 workers; medium: 50-249 workers; large: >250 workers).

Sample size estimate: The aim is to recruit of 70 worksites ("clusters"), approximately 35 per arm. Up to 685 participants ("employees") will be recruited from these clusters. A total sample of 685 employees across at least 70 clusters from across the UK (35 per arm) provides 80% power to detect a 0.6 point difference in WAI (SD 2.0; ICC 0.02), allowing for 60% attrition and with an expected cluster size of 10 per cluster.

Up to 60 participants (employees and stakeholders) will be invited to take part in the interview study. In the case of intervention employees, this will be after the 6-month survey has been completed. Stakeholders may be interviewed at any time during the study duration, but if they are from the intervention organisation, it is likely this will be after the employees have completed their 6-month survey.

Interviews will ascertain participants' views about the Pain-at-Work Toolkit, trial processes and outcome measures, and any perceived changes in individual or organisational outcomes.

Organisations are randomised to either i) active control group (SAU: support as usual), or ii) SAU plus Pain-at-Work Toolkit and Pain-at-Work Manager's Toolkit.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Beräknad)

685

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

    • Nottinghamshire
      • Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, Storbritannien, NG7 2HA
        • School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

  • Vuxen
  • Äldre vuxen

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Working-age adults (employees), aged 18 and over,
  • Working in a participating organisation in the UK.
  • With chronic pain interfering with their ability to undertake or enjoy productive work,
  • Able to comprehend the English language and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Working-age adults (employees), aged 18 and over,
  • Working in a participating organisation in the UK.
  • With chronic pain interfering with their ability to undertake or enjoy productive work,
  • Able to comprehend the English language and provide informed consent.

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Övrig
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Experimentell: Intervention
This is a cluster randomized trial. The level of randomization is organization. Participants (employees) receive Pain-at-Work Toolkit + Pain-at-Work Manager's Toolkit+ Support as Usual
This is a workplace trial, participating organisations will be randomized to intervention or control.
Andra namn:
  • Pain-at-Work Managers Toolkit
Support as Usual
Aktiv komparator: Contol
This is a cluster randomized trial. The level of randomization is organization. Participants (employees) receive Support as Usual
Support as Usual

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Work Ability
Tidsram: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).

Using the Work Ability Index 3 items (WAI).

  1. Assesses current work ability compared to highest work ability ever. Scale range is 0-10. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
  2. Assesses current work ability with respect to physical demands of work. Scale range 1-5. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
  3. Assesses current work ability with respect to mental demands of work. Scale range 1-5. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Acceptans av intervention
Tidsram: 6 månader
Resultat för att bedöma om deltagarna finner interventionen acceptabel. Detta kommer att självrapporteras i deltagarintervjuer efter 6 månader.
6 månader
Stress på jobbet
Tidsram: För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Globalt enstaka mått. Använda objektet: 'I allmänhet, hur stressigt tycker du att ditt jobb är?' med svar på en femgradig skala som sträcker sig från 1 = "inte alls stressande" till 5 = "extremt stressande". Högre poäng indikerar sämre resultat.
För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Omsättningsintentioner
Tidsram: För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Globalt mått för en enda artikel. Använda objektet: "Överväger du att lämna ditt jobb på grund av din smärta?" (Ja eller nej). Negativt svar är bättre resultat.
För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Depression
Tidsram: För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Använda Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). Skala används för att screena för depression. Poäng varierar från 0-6. Högre poäng tyder på sämre resultat.
För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Ångest
Tidsram: För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Använda det allmänna ångestsyndromet (GAD-7). Används som ett screeningverktyg och svårighetsmått för generaliserat ångestsyndrom. GAD-7-poängen beräknas genom att tilldela poängen 0, 1, 2 och 3 till svarskategorierna 'inte alls', 'flera dagar', 'mer än hälften av dagarna' och 'nästan varje dag' , respektive, och lägga ihop poängen för de sju frågorna. Totalpoäng varierar från 0-21. Högre poäng tyder på sämre resultat.
För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Hälso-relaterad livskvalité
Tidsram: För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Använda EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Innehåller fem dimensioner: rörlighet, egenvård, vanliga aktiviteter, smärta/obehag och ångest/depression. Varje dimension har 5 nivåer: inga problem, små problem, måttliga problem, allvarliga problem och extrema problem. Svar kodas som ensiffriga siffror som uttrycker den allvarlighetsnivå som valts i varje dimension. Till exempel, "små problem" (t.ex. 'Jag har små problem med att gå omkring') kodas alltid som '2'. Siffrorna för de fem dimensionerna kan kombineras i en 5-siffrig kod som beskriver respondentens hälsotillstånd. Högre poäng tyder på sämre resultat.
För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Health-related quality of life VAS
Tidsram: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6months).
Evaluates health today in a single score. The range 0-100.
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6months).
Impairments in work and activities
Tidsram: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Using the Work Productivity and Impairments Scale (WPAI-GH). Measures impairments in both paid work and unpaid work. It measures absenteeism, presenteeism as well as the impairments in unpaid activity because of health problem during the past seven days. The WPAI yields four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed); 2. Presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness); 3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/ absenteeism plus presenteeism); 4. Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity (worse outcomes).
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Health resource use questionnaire
Tidsram: Cumulative health resource use at time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months), time 2 (6 months).
Using a health care resource use questionnaire to measure completion rates for items of resource use, such as frequency of use of secondary and primary care, social care, private health care, and medications. Items are adapted from health economics data capture in previous research with pain populations. Minimum score zero, no maximum. Higher scores indicate greater frequency of resource use.
Cumulative health resource use at time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months), time 2 (6 months).
Social support at work
Tidsram: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Using the Demand Control Support Questionnaire (DCSQ) - Social Support Sub-Scale, consisting of 6 items covering: pleasant atmosphere, spirit of unity, colleagues' support, helpful colleagues, relationship with superiors, relationship with colleagues. Respondents are asked to report their levels of agreement or disagreement on a four-point Likert scale. Higher values indicate better outcomes (higher social support at work, score range 6-24).
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Work Self-Efficacy
Tidsram: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
This included six items, three ask about current: confidence to work, manage their condition and that working would not make the condition worse. The other three ask about future in one year: motivation to continue working, importance to continue and confidence to continue working. All rated 0-10, higher score equals higher self-efficacy.
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Occupational Self-Efficacy
Tidsram: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
The Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form (OSS-SF) rated from stongly disagree to strongly agree asks six items about the ability to remain calm, problem solve, handle difficulties, use experience, meet goals and cope with problems and job demands.
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Pain severity
Tidsram: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Measuring the current pain severity (0-10)
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Technology Acceptance
Tidsram: 3 months intervention only
Using the technology acceptance model questionnaire to access the acceptability of the Pain at Work Toolkit and the intention to use. Alongside and actual behaviour change.
3 months intervention only
Fidelity of intervention (Pain at Work Toolkit)
Tidsram: At 6 months
Intervention fidelity will be checked through collection of usage data for the Pain at Work Toolkit, to assess engagement with the intervention.
At 6 months

Andra resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Organisationsanmälda sjukskrivningar
Tidsram: För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Organisationsregister över sjukfrånvarotal för deltagande anställda.
För att bedöma förändring mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Arbetets art
Tidsram: Att dokumentera eventuella förändringar i deltagarens karaktär av arbete mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Att använda UK Standard Job Skill Classification (Jobbfärdighetsnivå 1-4): Huvudbefattning och bransch som arbetar i.
Att dokumentera eventuella förändringar i deltagarens karaktär av arbete mellan tid 0 (baslinje), tid 1 (3 månader) och tid 2 (6 månader).
Employment Status
Tidsram: To document any changes in participant's employment status between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
Using items from the Work Transitions Index (WTI) covering employment status, occupation and working hours
To document any changes in participant's employment status between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Holly Blake, PhD, University of Nottingham

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

11 maj 2026

Primärt slutförande (Beräknad)

30 september 2028

Avslutad studie (Beräknad)

28 februari 2029

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

7 april 2026

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

14 maj 2026

Första postat (Faktisk)

22 maj 2026

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

4 september 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

1 september 2026

Senast verifierad

1 april 2026

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • IRAS 367449
  • OBF/FR-000025871 (Annat bidrag/finansieringsnummer: Nuffield Foundation / Arthritis UK Oliver Bird Fund)
  • FMHS 120-0226 (Annan identifierare: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ethics Committee, University of Nottingham, UK)
  • 26011 (Annan identifierare: Sponsor, University Of Nottingham, UK)

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivning

Protocol - details shared via clinical trials.gov and protocol manuscript (with informed consent form) to be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal within 6 months.

Data Management Plan will be publicly available on https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk prior to study start.

Protocol - baseline (registration) 6 months (submitted protocol for publication) Statistical analysis plan - baseline Informed consent form - 6 months (submitted protocol for publication)

Tidsram för IPD-delning

Protocol - baseline (registration) 6 months (submitted protocol for publication) Statistical analysis plan - baseline Informed consent form - 6 months (submitted protocol for publication).

Kriterier för IPD Sharing Access

Protocol - details shared via clinical trials.gov and protocol manuscript (with informed consent form) to be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal within 6 months.

Data Management Plan will be publicly available on https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk prior to ethical approval and study start.

IPD-delning som stöder informationstyp

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAV
  • ICF

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera