- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07600892
Pain-at-Work Toolkit (Definitive Trial)
Pain-at-Work Toolkit for Employees With Chronic Pain (Definitive Trial)
The Pain-at-Work Toolkit has been created together with people who live with chronic pain, employers, healthcare professionals, and a national pain charity. The aim of the toolkit is to help employees with ongoing pain feel more confident in managing their condition at work, know where to find support, and improve their workplace experience, so they can remain in the workforce. People with lived experience of chronic pain will help guide the project throughout, including reviewing study documents and helping choose what outcomes to measure.
The investigators will work with around 30 organisations from different types of workplaces in the UK and invite more than 600 employees who live with pain to take part in the study. Organisation's employees will either receive access to the Pain-at-Work Toolkit and the Pain-at-Work Managers Toolkit ( to help managers support their staff) or the usual care that their organisation offers. Participants will be asked to complete online surveys at three points during the study. Intervention participants may be asked to take part in an interview at the end of the study to find out more about their experiences.
The study will examine whether the toolkit improves people's experience of work, including their productivity and ability to remain productive in their jobs. The investigators will also explore whether the toolkit offers good value for money.
Finally, the investigators will examine how the toolkit is used in practice-what works well, what might need improving, and how it could be made available to more employees in the future. The investigators will do this by interviewing employers or stakeholders involved in the employment of, support for, or policy development for adults with chronic pain.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
Background Chronic pain affects 28 million adults in the UK, significantly impacting their ability to be productive at work, feel fulfilled at work and/or remain in the active workforce. However, most people living with chronic pain cannot access work-related support from healthcare services, and the majority of employers do not routinely provide it. The Pain-at-Work Toolkit is a web-based resource that could help to reduce unfair differences in working lives for people with chronic pain, and positively impact their health and wellbeing, enhancing their productivity in the wider community. Co-created with people who live with pain, healthcare professionals and employers, this toolkit provides education and self-management advice to help people with chronic pain stay in, and thrive, at work.
The investigators tested the Pain-at-Work Toolkit in a preliminary trial in England ('feasibility trial' NCT05838677) . This showed that the Pain-at-Work Toolkit can be a very helpful support tool in the workplace for those living with chronic pain. The investigators recruited 18 organisations and 380 employees (50% and 217% more than expected, respectively), demonstrating that this toolkit meets a gap in employer provisions. Employees who received access to the toolkit valued its content and engaged with it without technical issues. Workers told investigators that their ability to work had improved after 6 months but these results need to be confirmed in a larger trial. Employers told investigators that they valued being able to offer it to their staff. The investigators are now updating the toolkit content to ensure it is relevant to employees across the UK.
The next step is to carry out a larger UK-wide study ('definitive trial'). The aim is to find out whether The Pain-at-Work Toolkit helps people to feel more able and confident at work, take fewer sick days, and be productive at work, and whether it provides good value for money.
The investigators will recruit at least 30 different organisations from across UK. These organisations will be randomly placed into one of two groups: one will access and use the Pain-at-Work Toolkit (the intervention group), and the other will continue as usual (the control group), to compare results fairly. A Pain-at-Work Manager Toolkit will be made available to line managers of organisations in the intervention group.
Over 600 employees will be recruited from these organisations. They will all be invited to complete online questionnaires at three time points: at recruitment, 3 months, and 6 months. The investigators will ask about their health and wellbeing, and factors relating to work, such as work ability, self-efficacy (confidence), sickness absence, work productivity, and intentions to leave.
This larger trial will include an 'implementation study'. This will involve conducting interviews with up to 60 people who have taken part in the trial and other stakeholders (such as employer representatives, line managers, HR or occupational health specialists, policymakers, professional bodies). The findings will shape our plans to make the Pain-at-Work Toolkit available widely to all workers with pain in the future.
Aims The aim of this study is to conduct a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial, with a built-in process and implementation evaluation, to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Pain at Work Toolkit for improving work ability in working-age adults with chronic pain across a range of UK workplaces.
- To determine the effectiveness of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit for improving work ability in working-age adults with chronic pain
- To determine intervention fidelity.
- To explore the relationship between implementation fidelity and outcomes.
- To understand the barriers and facilitators to successful implementation and rollout.
- To generate strategies for future implementation, maintenance, and scalability.
Protocol/ Method
The study consists of 3 work packages:
- Effectiveness trial (WP1),
- Health economic evaluation (WP2),
- Process and implementation evaluation (WP3).
Setting is community, comprised of employment settings in different sectors (public, private, third) in UK, varying in size (small:10-49 workers; medium: 50-249 workers; large: >250 workers).
Sample size estimate: The aim is to recruit a minimum of 30 worksites ("clusters"), approximately 15 per arm. Up to 685 participants ("employees") will be recruited from these clusters.
Up to 60 participants (employees and stakeholders) will be invited to take part in the interview study. In the case of intervention employees, this will be after the 6-month survey has been completed. Stakeholders may be interviewed at any time during the study duration, but if they are from the intervention organisation, it is likely this will be after the employees have completed their 6-month survey.
Interviews will ascertain participants' views about the Pain-at-Work Toolkit, trial processes and outcome measures, and any perceived changes in individual or organisational outcomes.
Organisations are randomised to either i) active control group (SAU: support as usual), or ii) SAU plus Pain-at-Work Toolkit and Pain-at-Work Manager's Toolkit.
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Holly Blake, PhD
- 전화번호: +44 (0)115 95 15559
- 이메일: holly.blake@nottingham.ac.uk
연구 연락처 백업
- 이름: Wendy J Chaplin, PhD
- 전화번호: +44 (0)115 74 85786
- 이메일: Wendy.Chaplin@nottingham.ac.uk
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Working-age adults (employees), aged 18 and over,
- Working in a participating organisation in the UK.
- With chronic pain interfering with their ability to undertake or enjoy productive work,
- Able to comprehend the English language and provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Working-age adults (employees), aged 18 and over,
- Working in a participating organisation in the UK.
- With chronic pain interfering with their ability to undertake or enjoy productive work,
- Able to comprehend the English language and provide informed consent.
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Intervention
This is a cluster randomized trial.
The level of randomization is organization.
Participants (employees) receive Pain-at-Work Toolkit + Pain-at-Work Manager's Toolkit+ Support as Usual
|
This is a workplace trial, participating organisations will be randomized to intervention or control.
다른 이름들:
Support as Usual
|
|
활성 비교기: Contol
This is a cluster randomized trial.
The level of randomization is organization.
Participants (employees) receive Support as Usual
|
Support as Usual
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Work Ability
기간: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
Using the Work Ability Index 3 items (WAI).
|
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
개입의 수용성
기간: 6 개월
|
참가자가 개입이 수용 가능한지 여부를 평가하기 위한 결과.
이것은 6개월에 참가자 인터뷰에서 자가 보고됩니다.
|
6 개월
|
|
직업 스트레스
기간: 시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
글로벌 단일 항목 측정.
항목 사용: '일반적으로 직장에서 얼마나 스트레스를 받습니까?' 1 = '전혀 스트레스가 아니다'에서 5 = '매우 스트레스가 많다'까지의 5점 척도로 응답한다.
높은 점수는 더 나쁜 결과를 나타냅니다.
|
시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
|
이직 의도
기간: 시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
글로벌 단일 항목 측정.
항목 사용: '고통으로 인해 직장을 그만둘 생각이 있습니까?' (예 혹은 아니오).
부정적인 반응이 더 나은 결과입니다.
|
시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
|
우울증
기간: 시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
환자 건강 설문지(PHQ-2) 사용.
척도는 우울증을 선별하는 데 사용됩니다.
점수 범위는 0-6입니다.
높은 점수는 더 나쁜 결과를 나타냅니다.
|
시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
|
불안
기간: 0번(기준), 1번(3개월), 2번(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
일반 불안 장애(GAD-7) 사용.
범불안장애에 대한 선별 도구 및 심각도 측정으로 사용됩니다.
GAD-7 점수는 '전혀 그렇지 않음', '몇 일', '절반 이상', '거의 매일'의 응답 범주에 0, 1, 2, 3의 점수를 할당하여 계산됩니다. , 각각 7개의 질문에 대한 점수를 합산합니다.
총점의 범위는 0-21입니다.
점수가 높을수록 결과가 좋지 않음을 나타냅니다.
|
0번(기준), 1번(3개월), 2번(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
|
건강 관련 삶의 질
기간: 0번(기준), 1번(3개월), 2번(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
EuroQol 5차원 설문지(EQ-5D-5L) 사용.
이동성, 자기 관리, 일상 활동, 통증/불편함, 불안/우울의 5가지 차원으로 구성됩니다.
각 차원에는 문제 없음, 약간의 문제, 보통의 문제, 심각한 문제, 극단적인 문제의 5가지 수준이 있습니다.
응답은 각 차원에서 선택된 심각도 수준을 나타내는 한 자리 숫자로 코딩됩니다.
예를 들어 '약간의 문제'(예:
'걷는 데 약간의 문제가 있습니다')는 항상 '2'로 코딩됩니다.
5개 차원의 숫자는 응답자의 건강 상태를 설명하는 5자리 코드로 결합될 수 있습니다.
점수가 높을수록 결과가 좋지 않음을 나타냅니다.
|
0번(기준), 1번(3개월), 2번(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
|
Health-related quality of life VAS
기간: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6months).
|
Evaluates health today in a single score.
The range 0-100.
|
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6months).
|
|
Impairments in work and activities
기간: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
Using the Work Productivity and Impairments Scale (WPAI-GH).
Measures impairments in both paid work and unpaid work.
It measures absenteeism, presenteeism as well as the impairments in unpaid activity because of health problem during the past seven days.
The WPAI yields four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed); 2. Presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness); 3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/ absenteeism plus presenteeism); 4. Activity Impairment.
WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity (worse outcomes).
|
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
|
Health resource use questionnaire
기간: Cumulative health resource use at time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months), time 2 (6 months).
|
Using a health care resource use questionnaire to measure completion rates for items of resource use, such as frequency of use of secondary and primary care, social care, private health care, and medications.
Items are adapted from health economics data capture in previous research with pain populations.
Minimum score zero, no maximum.
Higher scores indicate greater frequency of resource use.
|
Cumulative health resource use at time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months), time 2 (6 months).
|
|
Social support at work
기간: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
Using the Demand Control Support Questionnaire (DCSQ) - Social Support Sub-Scale, consisting of 6 items covering: pleasant atmosphere, spirit of unity, colleagues' support, helpful colleagues, relationship with superiors, relationship with colleagues.
Respondents are asked to report their levels of agreement or disagreement on a four-point Likert scale.
Higher values indicate better outcomes (higher social support at work, score range 6-24).
|
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
|
Work Self-Efficacy
기간: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
This included six items, three ask about current: confidence to work, manage their condition and that working would not make the condition worse.
The other three ask about future in one year: motivation to continue working, importance to continue and confidence to continue working.
All rated 0-10, higher score equals higher self-efficacy.
|
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
|
Occupational Self-Efficacy
기간: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
The Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form (OSS-SF) rated from stongly disagree to strongly agree asks six items about the ability to remain calm, problem solve, handle difficulties, use experience, meet goals and cope with problems and job demands.
|
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
|
Pain severity
기간: To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
Measuring the current pain severity (0-10)
|
To assess change between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
|
Technology Acceptance
기간: 3 months intervention only
|
Using the technology acceptance model questionnaire to access the acceptability of the Pain at Work Toolkit and the intention to use.
Alongside and actual behaviour change.
|
3 months intervention only
|
|
Fidelity of intervention (Pain at Work Toolkit)
기간: At 6 months
|
Intervention fidelity will be checked through collection of usage data for the Pain at Work Toolkit, to assess engagement with the intervention.
|
At 6 months
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
조직 보고 병가 기록
기간: 시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
참여 직원의 결근 비율에 대한 조직 기록.
|
시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이의 변화를 평가합니다.
|
|
업무의 성격
기간: 시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이에 참가자의 작업 특성에 대한 모든 변경 사항을 문서화합니다.
|
영국 표준 직무 기술 분류 사용(Job Skill Level 1-4): 주요 직위 및 근무 산업.
|
시간 0(기준선), 시간 1(3개월) 및 시간 2(6개월) 사이에 참가자의 작업 특성에 대한 모든 변경 사항을 문서화합니다.
|
|
Employment Status
기간: To document any changes in participant's employment status between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
Using items from the Work Transitions Index (WTI) covering employment status, occupation and working hours
|
To document any changes in participant's employment status between time 0 (baseline), time 1 (3 months) and time 2 (6 months).
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
협력자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Holly Blake, PhD, University of Nottingham
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- IRAS 367449
- OBF/FR-000025871 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: Nuffield Foundation / Arthritis UK Oliver Bird Fund)
- FMHS 120-0226 (기타 식별자: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ethics Committee, University of Nottingham, UK)
- 26011 (기타 식별자: Sponsor, University Of Nottingham, UK)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
Protocol - details shared via clinical trials.gov and protocol manuscript (with informed consent form) to be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal within 6 months.
Data Management Plan will be publicly available on https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk prior to study start.
Protocol - baseline (registration) 6 months (submitted protocol for publication) Statistical analysis plan - baseline Informed consent form - 6 months (submitted protocol for publication)
IPD 공유 기간
IPD 공유 액세스 기준
Protocol - details shared via clinical trials.gov and protocol manuscript (with informed consent form) to be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal within 6 months.
Data Management Plan will be publicly available on https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk prior to ethical approval and study start.
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
- 수액
- ICF
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
만성 통증에 대한 임상 시험
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaAstraZeneca완전한CTO(Chronic Total Occlusion)를 위한 PCI(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)를 받을 예정인 환자스페인
-
Bingol UniversityAtaturk University아직 모집하지 않음수술 전 불안 | 두려움 | PAIN
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York University; National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)모병
-
Istanbul University모병Masticatory Muscle Pain | 근시 통증 증후군 (MP)칠면조
-
Istanbul University모병이갈이 | 근막 통증 증후군 | Masticatory Muscle Pain | 현지 근육통터키 (Türkiye)