此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Day-case or Inpatient Care Following Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

2015年4月17日 更新者:Kristiina Mattila、Helsinki University Central Hospital

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Day-case and Inpatient Care Following Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of day surgery for elderly patients undergoing elective open inguinal hernia repair. Medically stable patients aged 65 years or older, with postoperative care available at home, were randomized to receive treatment either as day-cases or inpatients. Younger day-case patients undergoing the same procedure served as controls. Outcome measures during two postoperative weeks were complications, unplanned admissions and visits to the hospital, unplanned visits to primary health care and patients' acceptance of the type of provided care. The investigators expected to find a higher degree of satisfaction in the patient group receiving day-case care.

研究概览

详细说明

For repair of inguinal hernia, standard open mesh repair methods were used. For anaesthesia, local infiltration with lidocaine (10 mg/ml) and light intravenous sedation with propofol and fentanyl were primarily used. Reasons for choosing spinal or general anaesthesia were registered. For postoperative pain relief bupivacaine (5mg/ml) 10 ml was infiltered into the wound and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAID) and paracetamol combined with codeine were prescribed, when suitable. Day-case patients were discharged home according to commonly approved criteria. Inpatients stayed on the hospital ward overnight. All patients received the same preoperative and postoperative instructions orally and in writing. Physical activity was not restricted after the operation, and patients were encouraged to resume to normal life as soon as possible.

At the hospital, patient characteristics, type of anaesthesia, duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay and perioperative complications including unplanned overnight admissions were registered.

The study nurse interviewed all patients on the 1st and 14th postoperative day (POD) by telephone, using standardised follow-up questionnaires. The investigated variables on both dates included: satisfaction with treatment, patient-reported overall condition and functional capacity compared to the preoperative state, intensity of pain and use of pain medication. On POD 1, patients were inquired whether convalescence had been as expected, and asked to specify if not. Also the incidence and intensity other symptoms apart from pain were questioned. On POD 14 patients were questioned of unplanned contacts with primary healthcare, unplanned hospital visits, readmissions, and corresponding reasons.

Patient satisfaction with treatment in the operating room and following arrival to the postanaesthesia care unit was evaluated numerically (0-10), using the numeric rating scale (NRS), with 0 indicating lowest, and 10 highest possible satisfaction as rated by the patient. Intensity of postoperative pain was evaluated by NRS. Overall condition and functional capacity were evaluated using a 3 -point scale (good / moderate / poor). Health-related quality of life was measured using the RAND-36-instrument.

Patients were inquired about the degree of impairment in the groin area at the preoperative visit, and three months postoperatively.

Results are given as median (range) or mean (SD) as appropriate. Patient characteristics and surgery -related variables and NRS scores were compared using the Chi-square, Mann-Whitney-U and Kruskall-Wallis tests when appropriate. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon test for related samples. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

89

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • HUS
      • Espoo、HUS、芬兰、00029
        • Jorvi Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

65年 及以上 (年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • referral for open repair of inguinal hernia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe comorbidity (ASA class IV, unstable ASA class III)
  • postoperative care at home not available
  • not willing to receive day-case care
  • unable to understand numeric rating scale

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Day Surgery Group
discharge planned on day of surgery, inguinal hernia repair
inguinal hernia repair, discharge from the hospital on the day of surgery
有源比较器:Inpatient Group
overnight admission at the hospital, inguinal hernia repair
inguinal hernia repair, patient admitted overnight to hospital

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Patient satisfaction
大体时间:2 weeks postoperatively
satisfaction based on type of care
2 weeks postoperatively

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
short term outcome
大体时间:2 weeks postoperatively
rate of complications, unplanned admissions, unplanned visits to the hospital, unplanned visits to primary health care
2 weeks postoperatively

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Kristiina Mattila, MD PhD、Helsinki University Central Hospital

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2006年2月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2008年2月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2009年12月30日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2009年12月30日

首次发布 (估计)

2009年12月31日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2015年4月21日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2015年4月17日

最后验证

2015年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • T102010087a

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅