Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Day-case or Inpatient Care Following Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

17 april 2015 uppdaterad av: Kristiina Mattila, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Day-case and Inpatient Care Following Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of day surgery for elderly patients undergoing elective open inguinal hernia repair. Medically stable patients aged 65 years or older, with postoperative care available at home, were randomized to receive treatment either as day-cases or inpatients. Younger day-case patients undergoing the same procedure served as controls. Outcome measures during two postoperative weeks were complications, unplanned admissions and visits to the hospital, unplanned visits to primary health care and patients' acceptance of the type of provided care. The investigators expected to find a higher degree of satisfaction in the patient group receiving day-case care.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Betingelser

Detaljerad beskrivning

For repair of inguinal hernia, standard open mesh repair methods were used. For anaesthesia, local infiltration with lidocaine (10 mg/ml) and light intravenous sedation with propofol and fentanyl were primarily used. Reasons for choosing spinal or general anaesthesia were registered. For postoperative pain relief bupivacaine (5mg/ml) 10 ml was infiltered into the wound and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAID) and paracetamol combined with codeine were prescribed, when suitable. Day-case patients were discharged home according to commonly approved criteria. Inpatients stayed on the hospital ward overnight. All patients received the same preoperative and postoperative instructions orally and in writing. Physical activity was not restricted after the operation, and patients were encouraged to resume to normal life as soon as possible.

At the hospital, patient characteristics, type of anaesthesia, duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay and perioperative complications including unplanned overnight admissions were registered.

The study nurse interviewed all patients on the 1st and 14th postoperative day (POD) by telephone, using standardised follow-up questionnaires. The investigated variables on both dates included: satisfaction with treatment, patient-reported overall condition and functional capacity compared to the preoperative state, intensity of pain and use of pain medication. On POD 1, patients were inquired whether convalescence had been as expected, and asked to specify if not. Also the incidence and intensity other symptoms apart from pain were questioned. On POD 14 patients were questioned of unplanned contacts with primary healthcare, unplanned hospital visits, readmissions, and corresponding reasons.

Patient satisfaction with treatment in the operating room and following arrival to the postanaesthesia care unit was evaluated numerically (0-10), using the numeric rating scale (NRS), with 0 indicating lowest, and 10 highest possible satisfaction as rated by the patient. Intensity of postoperative pain was evaluated by NRS. Overall condition and functional capacity were evaluated using a 3 -point scale (good / moderate / poor). Health-related quality of life was measured using the RAND-36-instrument.

Patients were inquired about the degree of impairment in the groin area at the preoperative visit, and three months postoperatively.

Results are given as median (range) or mean (SD) as appropriate. Patient characteristics and surgery -related variables and NRS scores were compared using the Chi-square, Mann-Whitney-U and Kruskall-Wallis tests when appropriate. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon test for related samples. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

89

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

    • HUS
      • Espoo, HUS, Finland, 00029
        • Jorvi Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

65 år och äldre (Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • referral for open repair of inguinal hernia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe comorbidity (ASA class IV, unstable ASA class III)
  • postoperative care at home not available
  • not willing to receive day-case care
  • unable to understand numeric rating scale

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Behandling
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Enda

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Day Surgery Group
discharge planned on day of surgery, inguinal hernia repair
inguinal hernia repair, discharge from the hospital on the day of surgery
Aktiv komparator: Inpatient Group
overnight admission at the hospital, inguinal hernia repair
inguinal hernia repair, patient admitted overnight to hospital

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Patient satisfaction
Tidsram: 2 weeks postoperatively
satisfaction based on type of care
2 weeks postoperatively

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
short term outcome
Tidsram: 2 weeks postoperatively
rate of complications, unplanned admissions, unplanned visits to the hospital, unplanned visits to primary health care
2 weeks postoperatively

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Kristiina Mattila, MD PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart

1 februari 2006

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

1 februari 2008

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

30 december 2009

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

30 december 2009

Första postat (Uppskatta)

31 december 2009

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Uppskatta)

21 april 2015

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

17 april 2015

Senast verifierad

1 april 2015

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • T102010087a

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera