此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Comparison of Goal-directed Algorithms of Hemodynamic Therapy After Combined Valve Repair

2011年1月12日 更新者:Northern State Medical University

Comparison of Goal-directed Algorithms of Hemodynamic Therapy After Combined Valve Repair: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Valvular repair and repair surgery is rapidly progressing yet rather challenging aspect of current cardiosurgical practice.

Several approaches were introduced into the clinical practice to alleviate systemic inflammatory response induced by cardiopulmonary bypass and organ-specific injury including meticulous haemodynamic monitoring, pharmacological heart preconditioning, systemic use of anti-inflammatory agents, prevention of coagulopathy, and induced topical and systemic hypothermia. An in-depth monitoring of haemodynamics, oxygen transport, and vascular permeability is of a great clinical value to control the efficacy of these approaches.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare two algorithms of goal-directed therapy aimed to achieve a postoperative haemodynamic optimization in combined valve repair surgery.

研究概览

详细说明

Forty-three adult patients scheduled for elective two valve replacement/repair were enrolled into randomised single-centre study. All interventions were performed in cardiosurgical department of City hospital #1 (Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation) by the same surgical team. Three patients were excluded from the analysis; two - due to protocol violation and one - due to inadequate surgical correction diagnosed by intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography.

Day before surgery patients were asked for informed consent and randomized in two groups. In the first group postoperative haemodynamic optimization was targeted on parameters provided by pulmonary artery catheter (the PAC-group, n = 20): pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure, cardiac index (LifeScope monitor, Nihon Kohden, Japan) and hemoglobin blood level. In the second group haemodynamics was managed using parameters given by transpulmonary thermodilution (the COMPLEX-group), that included cardiac index, global end-diastolic volume index, extravascular lung water index, continuous central venous oxygen saturation, and oxygen delivery index as measured with PiCCO2 monitor (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany. In addition, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and hemoglobin concentration were included into both PAC- and PiCCO2-driven protocols.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

43

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Arkhangelsk、俄罗斯联邦、163000
        • City hospital # 1 / Northern State Medical University,

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Two valve repair / replacements
  • Age above 18
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pulmonary hypertension
  • insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
  • severe atherosclerosis of femoral arteries
  • severe respiratory failure
  • pregnancy

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)
PAC was used to guide hemodynamic therapy after combined valve repair
the data s=derived from PAC included pulmonary artery occlusion pressure etc
其他名称:
  • 不实际
有源比较器:COMPLEX
An combination of transpulmonary thermodilution and continuous monitoring of central venous saturation was used to guide hemodynamic therapy after combined valve repair surgery.
Described in details above
其他名称:
  • 非实际

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mortality
大体时间:Day 28
Mortality rate at Day 28
Day 28

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Fit for discharge
大体时间:non actual
Formal 'fit for discharge from ICU' criteria
non actual
Vasoactive support
大体时间:7 days
Duration of vasopressor and or inotrope support
7 days
Duration of respiratory support
大体时间:Day 7
The total duration of the respiratory support
Day 7

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Mikhail Y. Kirov, MD, PhD、Northern State Medical University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2008年1月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2010年8月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2010年9月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2011年1月4日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2011年1月12日

首次发布 (估计)

2011年1月13日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2011年1月13日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2011年1月12日

最后验证

2011年1月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅