Impact of Restriction of the Non Paretic Upper Limb Rehabilitation of Patients a With Stroke:Randomized Clinical Trial
2012年6月19日 更新者：Luciana B. dos Santos, PT、Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Impact of the Restriction of the Non Paretic Upper Limb in Rehabilitation of Patients Post-stroke:Randomized Clinical Trial
To evaluate whether the restriction of the non paretic upper limb (UL) is a factor that could interfere at the sensorimotor UL recovery for chronic stroke subjects and to verify the impact on daily function, quality of life.
In this pilot, randomized, blind and allocation concealment clinical trial, nineteen individuals with chronic stroke was randomly assigned, after the first evaluation, into two groups: group without restriction (G1), subject only to the specific training of paretic UL, and restricted group (G2), which underwent specific training of paretic UL and use of the restriction of non paretic UL
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
19
阶段
- 不适用
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
21年 至 70年 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- ability to actively extend at least 10° at the metacarpophalangeal the wrist;
- more than 6 months post onset of stroke;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mini-Mental State Examination;
- no excessive spasticity in any joints of the affected.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：With restraint
The group with restraint underwent specific training of paretic upper limb and use of restraint.
|
nineteen individuals with chronic stroke was randomly assigned, after the first evaluation, into two groups: group without restriction (G1), subject only to the specific training of paretic UL, and restricted group (G2), which underwent specific training of paretic UL and use of the restriction of non paretic UL.
The volunteers were evaluated before the beginning of the interventions, and the next day after completion of the 12 therapy sessions through the Fugl-Meyer Assessment
|
|
有源比较器：no restraint
The group control "without restraint" submitted only to the specific training of paretic upper limb
|
nineteen individuals with chronic stroke was randomly assigned, after the first evaluation, into two groups: group without restriction (G1), subject only to the specific training of paretic UL, and restricted group (G2), which underwent specific training of paretic UL and use of the restriction of non paretic UL.
The volunteers were evaluated before the beginning of the interventions, and the next day after completion of the 12 therapy sessions through the Fugl-Meyer Assessment
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
To investigate the impact that the restriction of non-paretic upper limb recovery would have on sensorimotor with Fugl-Meyer Scale
大体时间：1 year
|
Upper extremity motor impairment was evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FM).This scale has a total score of 66 points for upper limbs, reflecting a mild motor impairment (≥ 50), moderate to severe (50-20) and severe (< 20).
|
1 year
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
大体时间：1 year
|
The FIM consists of 18 items divided into 6 subscales measuring self-care, sphincter control, transfer, locomotion, communication, and social cognition ability.
Each item is rated from 1 to 7 based on the required level of assistance to perform the basic ADL (maximum score, 126).
Higher scores demonstrate greater independent participation in daily activities.
|
1 year
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始
2011年3月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2012年5月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2012年6月12日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2012年6月19日
首次发布 (估计)
2012年6月20日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
2012年6月20日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2012年6月19日
最后验证
2012年6月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.