此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Selecting Insulin Analogs for Closed-Loop Control Using Multiplex Pharmacokinetic Profiling

2019年11月21日 更新者:Steven J. Russell, MD, PhD、Massachusetts General Hospital

The investigators are doing this research study to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) (rate of absorption) of insulin lispro (Humalog), insulin aspart (Novolog), and insulin glulisine (Apidra) within individual subjects.

Additionally, the investigators will perform a preliminary feasibility evaluation of a minimally invasive continuous insulin monitoring (CIM) device and its use to derive PK parameters in human subjects.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

33

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston、Massachusetts、美国、02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older with clinical type 1 diabetes for at least five years
  • Diabetes managed using an insulin infusion pump and rapid- or very-rapid-acting insulins including insulin aspart (NovoLog), insulin lispro (Humalog), and insulin glulisine (Apidra).
  • Ability to consume a sufficient amount of carbohydrates over 2-3 hours to cover 9 units of rapid acting insulin

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Unable to comply with study procedures
  • Inadequate venous access as determined by study nurse or physician at time of screening.
  • Pregnancy
  • History of gastric banding, gastric bypass, or other gastrointestinal condition that may prevent a subject from consuming a normal sized meal
  • Hemoglobin <13.5 for men, < 12 for women

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Multiplex pharmacokinetic profiling
Multiplex pharmacokinetic profiling of regular human insulin, insulin aspart, insulin lispro, insulin glulisine, and regular human insulin. All subjects participated in the single study arm and received injections of each type of insulin. Blood samples were drawn at intervals for pharmacokinetic profiling.
实验性的:Continuous insulin monitoring
Continuous insulin monitoring (CIM) of insulin lispro. Some subjects participated in the CIM sub-study, which is distinct from the Multiplex Pharmacokinetic Profiling study. This intervention involved administering insulin lispro and monitoring pharmacokinetic profile of the drug using blood samples and an investigational continuous insulin monitoring system.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
For Multiplex PK Profiling: Aggregate Mean Difference in Tmax Between the Analog With Greatest and the Analog With the Least Value of Tmax for Individuals
大体时间:10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300 minutes after dose
The average difference in tmax between lispro and aspart in all participants
10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300 minutes after dose
For Continuous Insulin Monitoring: Time to Maximum Plasma Insulin and Time to Maximum Continuous Insulin Monitoring Insulin
大体时间:10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300 minutes after dose
10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300 minutes after dose

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Multiplex PK: Average Baseline HbA1c Categorized According to Baseline Use of Insulin Analog Found to Have the Most Favorable PK Profile for Each Individual
大体时间:Baseline
Subjects with a difference in tmax between analogs will be categorized as follows: using insulin with best PK for them, using insulin with worst PK for them, or using insulin with intermediate PK for them. The average A1c for each of the three categories is reported.
Baseline
Multiplex PK: Count of Subjects With Difference in Tmax Between the Analog With Greatest and the Analog With the Least Value of Tmax That is > 25%
大体时间:10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300 minutes after dose
10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200, 220, 240, 260, 280, 300 minutes after dose
Multiplex PK: Average Baseline HbA1c Categorized According to Baseline Use of Insulin Analog With Tmax < 60 Minutes vs. Use of an Insulin Analog With Tmax > 60 Minutes for Each Individual
大体时间:Baseline
Subjects with a difference in tmax between analogs will be categorized as follows: using insulin with tmax less than or equal to 60 minutes or using insulin with tmax > 60 minutes. The average A1c per group is reported.
Baseline
Multiplex PK: Average Number of Hypoglycemia Events Over the Last Month at Baseline Categorized According to Baseline Use of Insulin Analog Found to Have the Most Favorable PK Profile for Each Individual
大体时间:1 month prior to study entry
Subjects with a difference in tmax between analogs will be categorized as follows: using insulin with best PK for them, using insulin with worst PK for them, or using insulin with intermediate PK for them. The average number of hypoglycemic events per month per group is reported.
1 month prior to study entry

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2010年7月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年9月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2017年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2012年8月21日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2012年9月10日

首次发布 (估计)

2012年9月13日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2019年12月12日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年11月21日

最后验证

2019年11月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅