此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Transferability and Cost-effectiveness of PROSPECT in Surgical Trainees (PROSPECT)

2021年2月23日 更新者:University Ghent

The Study of Transferability and Cost-effectiveness of a Proficiency-based Stepwise Endovascular Curricular Training Program (PROSPECT) in Surgical Trainees

To design, validate and prove cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive endovascular simulation curriculum consisting of cognitive and psychomotor skills training for endovascular management of symptomatic vascular disease in the lower limbs.

研究概览

详细说明

The main goal is to design a comprehensive endovascular simulation curriculum consisting of cognitive and psychomotor skills training for endovascular management of symptomatic vascular disease in the lower limbs (Rutherford classification 2-5; stenosis or occlusion in the iliac, superficial femoral and popliteal arteries). The curriculum will consist of E-learning, video-based learning and simulation exercises on the Virtual Reality simulator on which an endovascular procedure will be simulated.

Skills transferability to real life practice will be verified by means of a RCT. In this RCT the investigators will compare the cognitive knowledge and technical performance of curricular trained surgical trainees with conventionally trained trainees during treatment of patients under supervision. The hypothesis states that surgeons trained within the PROSPECT curriculum will show improved technical knowledge of endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic disease in the iliac, superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and will demonstrate increased technical proficiency in the angiosuite in comparison with surgeons who received only conventional training. Subjects will be surgical trainees (N=32). They will be randomized into a three groups: a control group (N=11), a group that only has access to E-learning (N=10) and a PROSPECT group (N=11). Both groups will continue their traditional clinical education and the PROSPECT group will additionally be trained within this endovascular curriculum. The investigators hope that this study may ultimately lead to an improvement in the quality of patient care by standardizing competencies of endovascular operators in training and practice.

Additionally a cost-effectiveness analysis of PROSPECT compared to traditional training modalities will be executed. A successful training program is expected to lead to a shortening of the learning curve, reduction in number of errors during real life procedures and more efficient use of hybrid angio suites. The financial impact of potentially shorter duration of endovascular interventions will be studied and compared to time investment and additional costs associated with stepwise, supervised training using VR simulators.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

39

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Ghent、比利时、9000
        • Ghent University Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 65年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgical trainee
  • Knowledge and technical skill level evaluated
  • Demographics questionnaire and general MCQ test completed
  • 2 endovascular simulated exercises completed after familiarization with the simulator

Exclusion Criteria:

-

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:PROSPECT
the trainee will study four modules of E-learning (basic endovascular skills module, iliac artery module, superficial femoral artery module and postoperative care module). After studying each module the trainee will complete a Multiple Choice Questionnaire and perform a simple and a complex exercise on the simulator.
无干预:CONTROL
The trainee will continue clinical education without additional curriculum, but will be allowed to study independently.
实验性的:E-LEARNING
the trainee will study four modules of E-learning (basic endovascular skills module, iliac artery module, superficial femoral artery module and postoperative care module). After studying each module the trainee will complete a Multiple Choice Questionnaire, no simulation.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Technical and Global Performance of the Surgical Trainee in Real Life Procedures
大体时间:6 weeks after intervention

The consultant will assess the trainee during the intervention.

  • Global Rating Scale of Endovascular Performance (Range 11-55): to rate the global performance - modified OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) scale
  • Examiner Checklist for Diagnostic Angiography, Angioplasty and Stenting (Range 17-85): to rate the technical performance

For both scales, the higher the score, the better. Surrogate measures of performance are also evaluated (total procedure and fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, contrast volume and number of endovascular tools used). Post-hoc videos of hand movements and the fluoroscopy imaging recorded during the real procedure will be rated using the same scoring systems. Two real life endovascular procedures will be performed within six weeks after completing the curriculum. Evaluation will occur during the intervention and videos of hand movements and fluoroscopy imaging will be evaluated afterwards.

6 weeks after intervention

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Improved Knowledge and Technical Performance of the Surgical Trainee on a Simulated Complex Module
大体时间:Pre curriculum, 6 weeks and 3 months after completion of the curriculum (3 months only for intervention arms)

The cognitive and technical skills retention of the surgical trainee is measured by a MCQ test and a simulation based exercise, pre and post PROSPECT.

MCQ test: validated Multiple Choice Test - Range 0-20 GRS: Global Rating Scale of Endovascular Performance, modified OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) scale: to assess global performance (same as primary outcome) - Range: 11-55 Examiners checklist: Examiner Checklist for Diagnostic Angiography, Angioplasty and Stenting: to assess technical performance (same as primary objective) - Range: 17-85

For al outcome measures: the higher the score, the better

Pre curriculum, 6 weeks and 3 months after completion of the curriculum (3 months only for intervention arms)

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
PROSPECT Proficiency
大体时间:After RCT
After the RCT, a registry was started with all participants that started PROSPECT. Outcome: do PROSPECT participants pass the curriculum, do they become proficient?
After RCT

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Isabelle Van Herzeele, MD, PhD、University Ghent

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2014年8月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年2月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2016年2月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2013年10月15日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2013年10月15日

首次发布 (估计)

2013年10月18日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2021年3月16日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2021年2月23日

最后验证

2021年1月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • 2013/783

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅