此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Colonoscopic Skill Acquisition and Transfer Via Simulated Curriculum of Progressive Training

2017年8月8日 更新者:Samir Grover、Unity Health Toronto

Do Progressive Levels of Simulation Fidelity Enhance Colonoscopic Skill Acquisition and Transfer in Novice Endoscopic Trainees?

It is hypothesized that a progressive simulated learning strategy will result in better global clinical performance (e.g., technical, communication) and transfer of endoscopic skill, as compared with a high-fidelity simulation strategy.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

37

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Ontario
      • Toronto、Ontario、加拿大、M5B 1W8
        • St. Michael's Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • novice endoscopists from Adult Gastroenterology, Pediatric Gastroenterology, General Surgery training programs at University of Toronto

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Trainees who have performed greater than 25 colonoscopies will be excluded to ensure all participants are novices.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Progressive Group
The progressive learning group will undertake 6 hours of interactive small-group didactic sessions, interlaced with up to 6 hours of self-directed instruction initially on the low-fidelity box simulator, with feedback provided one-on-one by an expert academic endoscopist. Participants in the progressive learning group can switch to the high-fidelity simulator at their discretion, but cannot return to the low-fidelity simulator. On the high fidelity VR simulator they can progress through six modules each in colonoscopy and endoscopic polypectomy in a self-directed fashion, with one-on-one feedback by an expert academic endoscopist. The endoscopy instructor will demonstrate techniques, answer questions and provide feedback. The entirety of this will be delivered over two days.
无干预:High-Fidelity Group
The high-fidelity group will undertake 6 hours of interactive small-group didactic and hands-on sessions on the theory of colonoscopy, led by an expert academic gastroenterologist. The sessions will be interlaced with up to six hours of self-directed instruction on the high-fidelity VR simulator. Six task-specific modules of increasing difficulty in colonoscopy and colonoscopic polypectomy will be taught solely on the VR simulator with one-on-one feedback from an expert academic endoscopist. The endoscopy instructor will demonstrate techniques, answer questions and provide feedback as necessary. The entirety of this will be delivered over two days.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Difference Between Progressive and High-Fidelity Groups on Clinical Colonoscopy Peformance (JAG/DOPS)
大体时间:4-6 weeks post-intervention
The Joint Advisory Group (JAG) Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) tool is a tool to assess colonoscopic competency and includes ratings of the following domains: (i) assessment, consent and communication; (ii) safety and sedation; (iii) endoscopic skills during insertion and withdrawal; and, (iv) diagnostic and therapeutic ability. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores representing higher colonoscopic competency. The tool will be used to assess participants before and after the intervention at a time of one week. A change in these ratings before and after intervention is the primary outcome.
4-6 weeks post-intervention

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Cognitive Knowledge of Endoscopy
大体时间:Pre-training, immediate post-training
Assessed via a multiple-choice question test on the theory and practice of endoscopy. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores representing a more knowledge of the theory and practice of endoscopy.
Pre-training, immediate post-training
Colonoscopy Specific-performance.
大体时间:Pre-training, immediate post-training, and 4-6 weeks after training (delayed post-training)
The Joint Advisory Group (JAG) Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) tool is a tool to assess colonoscopic competency and includes ratings of the following domains: (i) assessment, consent and communication; (ii) safety and sedation; (iii) endoscopic skills during insertion and withdrawal; and, (iv) diagnostic and therapeutic ability. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores representing higher colonoscopic competency. The tool will be used to assess participants on virtual reality colonoscopy cases. A change in these ratings before and after intervention is a secondary outcome.
Pre-training, immediate post-training, and 4-6 weeks after training (delayed post-training)
Colonoscopy Specific Performance, Communication Skills, and Global Performance on an Integrated Scenario
大体时间:Immediate post-training and 4-6 weeks after training (delayed post-training)

Technical skills, communication skills, and global performance assessed during an integrated scenario through the JAG DOPS tool, integrated scenario communication rating form (ISCRF), and integrated scenario global rating form (ISGRF) respectively.

The JAG DOPS tool, as previously described, will be used to assess participants on integrated scenario colonoscopy cases. A change in these ratings before and after intervention is a secondary outcome.

The ISCRF and ISGRF are tools which measure communication skills and global performance with a standardized nurse and standardized patient during a simulated colonoscopy. These tools can have scores from 0-100, with higher scores representing better performance.

Immediate post-training and 4-6 weeks after training (delayed post-training)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Samir C Grover, MD/MEd、Unity Health Toronto

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2013年6月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2014年7月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2014年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2013年11月17日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2013年11月26日

首次发布 (估计)

2013年12月4日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年2月19日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2017年8月8日

最后验证

2017年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅