此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Correlation Study of Imaging Data Acquired During CABG With Data Acquired in the Cath Lab (PERSEUS)

2019年8月23日 更新者:Dr Ashesh N. Buch、East Carolina University

Collaborative Pilot Study to Determine the Correlation Between Intra-Operative Observations Using SPY® Near Infra-Red Imaging and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Physiological Assessment of Lesion Severity (PERSEUS Pilot Study)

Visual assessment of a coronary artery narrowing (called stenosis) seen on angiography is conventionally used to infer how likely the stenosis will limit blood flow (called ischemia) under conditions of increased demand (e.g exercise). This is based on animal work and data from humans with simple single vessel disease with no co-existing conditions. These data have been extrapolated to more complex patients/ complex disease but clearly over-simplifies the situation in the majority of patients cardiologists treat.

Pivotal work by DeBruyne, Pils and colleagues in the 90's convincingly showed that pressure derived measurements, called FFR, from the coronary artery during a cardiac catheterization, more accurately identify stenoses that would cause ischemia compared to visual assessment alone. A strategy of FFR guided coronary stenting with drug eluting stents significantly improved outcomes and reduced costs compared to visual assessment alone (FAME trial). Deferring treatment based on FFR has been shown to be safe (DEFER Trial). FFR has excellent sensitivity and specificity. A FFR of <=0.80 was used as this identified ischemia causing lesions 90% of the time. Therefore, the concept of FFR guided percutaneous revascularisation and treatment deferral has a robust evidence base to support it.

Coronary bypass grafting (CABG) is traditionally based solely on a visual assessment of angiography images. SPY® Infrared Fluorescence Angiography (NIRF, FDA approved 2005) is used by some cardiac surgeons to assess the patency of bypass grafts in real-time in the operating room, as a surrogate for immediate traditional coronary angiography. Dr. Ferguson observed that regional myocardial perfusion (RMP) image data was also captured in these video sequences.

Study Hypotheses:

  1. In patients who are likely CABG candidates, target vessel epicardial coronary arteries (TVECAs) with FFR > 0.80 will not demonstrate an increase in RMP despite an anatomically patent bypass conduit during SPY® imaging.
  2. In TVECAs with an increase in RMP during SPY® imaging, cardiac catheter laboratory measures of coronary physiology from that TVECA, namely one or a combination of FFR, CFR, HSR and HMR, will correlate with the SPY® data on myocardial perfusion, and suggest a potential mechanism for this physiologic response to TVECA grafting.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

1

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • North Carolina
      • Greenville、North Carolina、美国、27834
        • East Carolina Heart Institute at Vidant Medical Center

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 80年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18<80
  • Patients with stable angina or NSTEMI with total CK rise of <1000 U/litre who after planned coronary angiography are going to be referred for CABG and have at least one vessel with a visual 40-80% stenosis that is interrogated with intracoronary physiology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergent status, or Cardiogenic shock
  • LVEF <40%
  • History of actively malignant disease
  • Patient needing concomitant valvular surgery or other cardiac structural reconstructive surgery
  • As is standard of care, those vessels that are extremely tortuous, very small caliber and/or heavily calcified would not have such wires passed down them. Furthermore, those vessels that are 80-90+% stenosed, with <TIMI 3 flow, which we would not normally pass a diagnostic physiology pressure wire, would not be studied with ComboXT wire.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:诊断
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
其他:Patients referred for CABG
  • Patients who after undergoing standard of care diagnostic coronary angiography will be referred for CABG
  • ComboMap XT Guidewire
  • 'SPY' NIRF During CABG
Intracoronary pressure and flow measurements
FDA approved use of injection of indocyanine green for the purposes of performing pre and post coronary grafting graft patency and perfusion assessment with the SPY near infra red fluorescence system

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Correlation Analysis
大体时间:18 months
Correlation between anatomy, functional anatomy, FFR, SPY® RMP change, and the presence or absence of imaged competitive flow
18 months

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Correlation Analysis
大体时间:18 months
Correlation analysis between anatomy, functional anatomy, FFR, CFR, HMR and SPY® perfusion data for each TVECA and perfusion territory.
18 months
Instantaneous Wave Free Ratio (iFR)
大体时间:18 months
Offline analysis of de-identified encrypted data for each TVECA interrogated with ComboMap XT wire by Dr Justin Davies's research group, Imperial College, London for iFR determination. Correlation analysis between iFR and presence or absence of imaged competitive flow and intra-operative RMP data on SPY® NIRF
18 months
Wave Intensity Analysis (WIA)
大体时间:18 months
Offline wave wave intensity analysis (WIA) of de-identified encrypted data for each TVECA interrogated with ComboMap XT wire by Dr Justin Davies's research group, Imperial College, London. Correlation analysis between WIA data and presence or absence of imaged competitive flow and intra-operative RMP data on SPY® NIRF
18 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Ashesh N Buch, MBChB, MD、East Carolina University
  • 首席研究员:T. Bruce Ferguson, MD、East Carolina University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2014年12月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2018年3月30日

研究完成 (实际的)

2019年3月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2014年5月12日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2014年5月12日

首次发布 (估计)

2014年5月14日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2019年8月28日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年8月23日

最后验证

2019年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

是的

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅