此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Usability Evaluation of Menai CPAP Masks

2021年2月2日 更新者:ResMed

Menai Mask Systems - Clinical Study 1

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the subjective performance of the Menai mask systems (full face, nasal, and pillows variants), compared against Comparison mask systems.

研究概览

详细说明

The study will evaluate the subjective seal, comfort, stability, usability, and humidification performance of the prototype mask systems in CPAP established patients. The performance of the prototype Menai mask systems (full face, nasal, and pillows variants) will be subjectively assessed through user questionnaires based on an 11-point Likert scale, and will be compared against Comparison masks.

The prototype masks share the same parts (cushion, frame, headgear), with the difference being that the Menai masks feature a novel vent and humidification system.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

30

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney、New South Wales、澳大利亚、2153
        • ResMed Sleep Research Centre

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 90年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants willing to provide written informed consent
  • Participants who can read and comprehend written and spoken English
  • Participants who are over 18 years of age
  • Participants who have been diagnosed with OSA
  • Participants who have been established on CPAP for ≥ 6 months
  • Participants who are currently using the same mask type/variant as the interventional mask system to be evaluated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are not able to provide written informed consent
  • Participants who are unable to comprehend written and spoken English
  • Participants who are pregnant
  • Participants who are unsuitable to participate in the study in the opinion of the researcher
  • Participants with a pre-existing lung disease or a condition that would predispose them to pneumothorax (e.g. COPD, lung cancer; fibrosis of the lungs; recent (< 2years) case of pneumonia or lung infection, lung injury)
  • Participants who cannot participate for the duration of the trial
  • Participants who are established on bi-level support therapy
  • Participants who are not currently using the same mask type/variant as the interventional mask system to be evaluated

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:交叉作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Full Face
Participants will trial the same mask type/variant (full face, nasal, pillows) as the variant they are using as part of their current treatment. Participants in this arm will trial the Menai mask (full face) and Comparison Menai Standard mask (full face) for 7 nights each.
Prototype mask system (full face variant) with novel vent and humidification system
Prototype mask system (full face variant) with conventional vent and humidification system
实验性的:Nasal
Participants will trial the same mask type/variant (full face, nasal, pillows) as the variant they are using as part of their current treatment. Participants in this arm will trial the Menai mask (nasal) and Comparison Menai Standard mask (nasal) for 7 nights each.
Prototype mask system (nasal variant) with novel vent and humidification system
Prototype mask system (nasal variant) with conventional vent and humidification system
实验性的:Pillows
Participants will trial the same mask type/variant (full face, nasal, pillows) as the variant they are using as part of their current treatment. Participants in this arm will trial the Menai mask (pillows) and Comparison Menai Standard mask (pillows) for 7 nights each.
Prototype mask system (pillows variant) with conventional vent and humidification system
Prototype mask system (pillows variant) with conventional vent and humidification system

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Usability Performance Evaluation
大体时间:2 weeks
Evaluation of the usability performance (seal, comfort, etc) of the Menai masks, compared to the Comparison Menai Standard masks.
2 weeks

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Humidification Performance Evaluation
大体时间:2 weeks
Evaluation of the humidification performance of the Menai masks (passive humidification), compared to the Comparison Menai Standard masks (active humidification).
2 weeks

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Klaus Schindhelm, BE PhD、Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney Australia and Applied Research, ResMed Ltd Sydney Australia

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2015年5月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年7月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2015年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2015年2月1日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2015年2月17日

首次发布 (估计)

2015年2月18日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2021年2月4日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2021年2月2日

最后验证

2021年2月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅