此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Dual Task in Institutionalized Elderly

2015年12月2日 更新者:Lislei Jorge Patrizzi、Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro

Dual Task in Institutionalized Elderly: Positive Impact on the Risk of Falls and Functionality

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of eight weeks of cognitive motor training (dual task) in the risk of falls, balance, independence in basic activities of daily living (BADL) and handgrip in institutionalized elderly.

Methods: The sample was divided in two groups: double task group (DTG), consists of five elderly, undergoing a training consists of motor and cognitive activities and control group (CG) consists of four seniors who underwent conventional kinesiotherapeutic training, based on global stretching and strengthening exercises, both held in 16 sessions.

研究概览

详细说明

Experimental, prospective and quantitative study, whose sample was selected for convenience in a long-term care institution for the elderly (LTCF) in the city of Uberaba - MG. The volunteers were divided into two groups, named dual task group (DTG) consists of five seniors, and control group (CG) consists of four elderly. All participants of both groups answered a questionnaire with sociodemographic and economic characteristics of the sample. Participants underwent a pre- and post evaluation containing vital signs parameters (blood pressure, respiratory rate and heart rate), anthropometric data (weight and height) and different tests to evaluate the balance, functional mobility, risk of falls, muscle strength and independence to carry out basic activities of daily living. The performed tests were Timed Up and Go (TUG) conventional, motor TUG and TUG cognitive, beyond Romberg test and Sensitized Romberg, Berg Balance Scale, and modified Katz scale (with maintenance of the six original activities of the scale, but with simulation to the performance of each task, measuring the spent time).

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

6

阶段

  • 不适用

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

60年 至 80年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion criteria:

  • individuals over the age of 60,
  • minimum score of 18 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE),
  • individuals classified as sedentary according the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (short version IPAQ-),
  • literate and visual acuity preserved or corrected.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Individuals unable to remain standing upright
  • individuals dependent from auxiliary device to walk
  • those who performed another type of physical therapy intervention concomitantly

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Cognitive motor training
Evaluate the effectiveness of a 12-week training based on dual-task (motor and cognitive) in institutionalized elderly.
Initially an intervention consisting of double duty activities (motor-cognitive) and the control group will be subjected to a conventional treatment based on stretching and strengthening will be held.
有源比较器:Control Group
kinesiotherapeutic conventional treatment
Standardized global stretching and strengthening with squat exercise, plantar flexion in foot and elbow flexion supporting body weight in the hands arranged on the wall

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Risk of falls
大体时间:8 weeks of training
Measured by the following tests: TUG, motor TUG, cognitive TUG, Romberg and sensitized Romberg (all measured in seconds)
8 weeks of training

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Independence to carry out basic activities of daily living
大体时间:8 weeks of training
Through the modified Katz scale: the simulation of the activities originally present in the Katz scale was performed by the participants, and the time taken to their execution was recorded.
8 weeks of training
Muscle strength
大体时间:8 weeks of training
Through dynamometry
8 weeks of training

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Lislei Patrizzi, Professor、Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2014年2月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年6月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2015年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2015年8月14日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2015年12月2日

首次发布 (估计)

2015年12月3日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2015年12月3日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2015年12月2日

最后验证

2015年12月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • UFTM 2015

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅