此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Remote Controlled Analgesia on Patient Experience (R-CAPE)

2020年4月1日 更新者:University Hospital, Montpellier

Effect of Perineural Catheter Analgesia on Patient Experience After Orthopedic Surgery

The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous nerve blocks with single injection in terms of perioperative patient satisfaction after scheduled orthopedic ambulatory surgery. Subgroup analyses will be performed, a priori, according to patients Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and type of surgery.

Secondary objectives comprise the assessment of pain, readmission rates, patient mobilization, quality of sleep and heart rate collected by an activity tracker. Scales about quality of recovery will be performed on day 1, about quality of life on day 45 and presence of neuropathic pain will be screened at 3 months. An economic study will also be conducted, including work resumption at 3 months.

This is a multicentric prospective study. Three hundred patients will be randomized in two parallel groups: continuous nerve blocks delivered thru remote-controlled electronic pump versus single local anesthetics injection.

The primary endpoint is the EVAN-G patient satisfaction scale, scored at day 2. Secondary endpoints will include assessment of pain, opiates consumption, sensitivity and motricity scores, rate of catheter falls at home, hospital readmission, patient mobilization, sleep and heart rate as assessed by an activity tracker, PCS before the surgery and Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scale at day 1, Short-Form 36 (SF36) at day 45 and Neuropathic Pain assessment (DN4) at day 90.

研究概览

详细说明

Acute postoperative pain is poorly treated. More than three-quarters of patients complain of pain, from moderate to extreme, after surgery. In orthopedic surgery, continuous nerve blocks analgesia has proved effective among in-hospital patients but single injection strategy is easier to implement in the growing outpatient setting.

The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous nerve blocks with single injection in terms of perioperative patient satisfaction after scheduled orthopedic ambulatory surgery. Subgroup analyses will be performed, a priori, according to patients Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and type of surgery.

Secondary objectives comprise the assessment of pain, readmission rates, patient mobilization, quality of sleep and heart rate collected by an activity tracker. Scales about quality of recovery will be performed on day 1, about quality of life on day 45 and presence of neuropathic pain will be screened at 3 months. An economic study will also be conducted, including work resumption at 3 months.

The inclusion criteria are adults undergoing outpatient scheduled orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia with regional analgesia.

Non-inclusion criteria are patients over 80 years, documented cognitive impairment, inability to complete a self-administered questionnaire, presenting American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 3 unsteady or 4, or spontaneously requiring analgesic perineural catheter or a single injection of local anesthetics.

This is a multicentric prospective study. Three hundred patients will be randomized in two parallel groups: continuous nerve blocks delivered thru remote-controlled electronic pump versus single local anesthetics injection.

The primary endpoint is the EVAN-G patient satisfaction scale, scored at day 2. Secondary endpoints will include assessment of pain, opiates consumption, sensitivity and motricity scores, rate of catheter falls at home, hospital readmission, patient mobilization, sleep and heart rate as assessed by an activity tracker, PCS before the surgery and Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scale at day 1, Short-Form 36 (SF36) at day 45 and Neuropathic Pain assessment (DN4) at day 90.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

300

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Montpellier、法国、34295
        • Department of Anesthesiology and critical care, Lapeyronie University Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 80年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subject aged 18 or more, up to 80 years;
  • Undergoing potentially painful scheduled orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Eligible to outpatient care;
  • Respecting the ambivalence clause defined below:

    1. no cons-indication to analgesic perineural catheter;
    2. not known allergy to local anesthetics;
    3. likely to be a candidate for continuous nerve block analgesia;
  • Ability to complete a self-reported questionnaire;
  • Have given written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 or more than 80 years;
  • Pregnant or nursing women ;
  • Not being affiliated to the social security scheme;
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics of the amide type;
  • Regulatory constraints in the outpatient management of perineural catheters not respected:

    1. Inability of daily nursing care;
    2. No presence of a responsible adult at home the night of the intervention;
  • Scheduled hospital stay;
  • ASA physical status score (American Society of Anesthesiologists) above 3 or 3 unsteady;
  • Spontaneous request for continuous nerve block or single injection;
  • Topic unable to fulfill only a self-administered questionnaire (inability to read French, severe cognitive impairment);
  • Subject with cognitive impairment already documented (Alzheimer, dementia, neurological sequelae);
  • Topic treated with antipsychotics (neuroleptics or lithium);
  • Subject has a documented chronic pain syndrome;
  • Active consumer of narcotic topic;
  • Topic have not signed informed consent.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Electronic pump
Continuous nerve blocks Remote-controlled perineural local anesthetics delivery
Remote-controlled perineural local anesthetics delivery
无干预:single injection

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Patient experience and satisfaction scale (EVAN-G)
大体时间:Second day after surgery
Description: Patient experience and satisfaction scale
Second day after surgery

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Patient quality of recovery (QoR)
大体时间:First day after surgery
Description: Patient quality of recovery
First day after surgery

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 学习椅:Xavier CAPDEVILA, M.D., Ph.D.、University Hospital, Montpellier

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2016年6月7日

初级完成 (实际的)

2019年10月21日

研究完成 (实际的)

2019年12月2日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2016年3月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2016年3月25日

首次发布 (估计)

2016年3月28日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年4月3日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2020年4月1日

最后验证

2016年3月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅