Remote Controlled Analgesia on Patient Experience (R-CAPE)
Effect of Perineural Catheter Analgesia on Patient Experience After Orthopedic Surgery
The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous nerve blocks with single injection in terms of perioperative patient satisfaction after scheduled orthopedic ambulatory surgery. Subgroup analyses will be performed, a priori, according to patients Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and type of surgery.
Secondary objectives comprise the assessment of pain, readmission rates, patient mobilization, quality of sleep and heart rate collected by an activity tracker. Scales about quality of recovery will be performed on day 1, about quality of life on day 45 and presence of neuropathic pain will be screened at 3 months. An economic study will also be conducted, including work resumption at 3 months.
This is a multicentric prospective study. Three hundred patients will be randomized in two parallel groups: continuous nerve blocks delivered thru remote-controlled electronic pump versus single local anesthetics injection.
The primary endpoint is the EVAN-G patient satisfaction scale, scored at day 2. Secondary endpoints will include assessment of pain, opiates consumption, sensitivity and motricity scores, rate of catheter falls at home, hospital readmission, patient mobilization, sleep and heart rate as assessed by an activity tracker, PCS before the surgery and Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scale at day 1, Short-Form 36 (SF36) at day 45 and Neuropathic Pain assessment (DN4) at day 90.
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
Acute postoperative pain is poorly treated. More than three-quarters of patients complain of pain, from moderate to extreme, after surgery. In orthopedic surgery, continuous nerve blocks analgesia has proved effective among in-hospital patients but single injection strategy is easier to implement in the growing outpatient setting.
The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous nerve blocks with single injection in terms of perioperative patient satisfaction after scheduled orthopedic ambulatory surgery. Subgroup analyses will be performed, a priori, according to patients Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and type of surgery.
Secondary objectives comprise the assessment of pain, readmission rates, patient mobilization, quality of sleep and heart rate collected by an activity tracker. Scales about quality of recovery will be performed on day 1, about quality of life on day 45 and presence of neuropathic pain will be screened at 3 months. An economic study will also be conducted, including work resumption at 3 months.
The inclusion criteria are adults undergoing outpatient scheduled orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia with regional analgesia.
Non-inclusion criteria are patients over 80 years, documented cognitive impairment, inability to complete a self-administered questionnaire, presenting American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 3 unsteady or 4, or spontaneously requiring analgesic perineural catheter or a single injection of local anesthetics.
This is a multicentric prospective study. Three hundred patients will be randomized in two parallel groups: continuous nerve blocks delivered thru remote-controlled electronic pump versus single local anesthetics injection.
The primary endpoint is the EVAN-G patient satisfaction scale, scored at day 2. Secondary endpoints will include assessment of pain, opiates consumption, sensitivity and motricity scores, rate of catheter falls at home, hospital readmission, patient mobilization, sleep and heart rate as assessed by an activity tracker, PCS before the surgery and Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scale at day 1, Short-Form 36 (SF36) at day 45 and Neuropathic Pain assessment (DN4) at day 90.
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
-
Montpellier, Frankrike, 34295
- Department of Anesthesiology and critical care, Lapeyronie University Hospital
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female subject aged 18 or more, up to 80 years;
- Undergoing potentially painful scheduled orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia.
- Eligible to outpatient care;
Respecting the ambivalence clause defined below:
- no cons-indication to analgesic perineural catheter;
- not known allergy to local anesthetics;
- likely to be a candidate for continuous nerve block analgesia;
- Ability to complete a self-reported questionnaire;
- Have given written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age less than 18 or more than 80 years;
- Pregnant or nursing women ;
- Not being affiliated to the social security scheme;
- Known allergy to local anesthetics of the amide type;
Regulatory constraints in the outpatient management of perineural catheters not respected:
- Inability of daily nursing care;
- No presence of a responsible adult at home the night of the intervention;
- Scheduled hospital stay;
- ASA physical status score (American Society of Anesthesiologists) above 3 or 3 unsteady;
- Spontaneous request for continuous nerve block or single injection;
- Topic unable to fulfill only a self-administered questionnaire (inability to read French, severe cognitive impairment);
- Subject with cognitive impairment already documented (Alzheimer, dementia, neurological sequelae);
- Topic treated with antipsychotics (neuroleptics or lithium);
- Subject has a documented chronic pain syndrome;
- Active consumer of narcotic topic;
- Topic have not signed informed consent.
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Behandling
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Electronic pump
Continuous nerve blocks Remote-controlled perineural local anesthetics delivery
|
Remote-controlled perineural local anesthetics delivery
|
|
Inget ingripande: single injection
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient experience and satisfaction scale (EVAN-G)
Tidsram: Second day after surgery
|
Description: Patient experience and satisfaction scale
|
Second day after surgery
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient quality of recovery (QoR)
Tidsram: First day after surgery
|
Description: Patient quality of recovery
|
First day after surgery
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Sponsor
Utredare
- Studiestol: Xavier CAPDEVILA, M.D., Ph.D., University Hospital, Montpellier
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Uppskatta)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- 9677
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .