Remote Controlled Analgesia on Patient Experience (R-CAPE)
Effect of Perineural Catheter Analgesia on Patient Experience After Orthopedic Surgery
The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous nerve blocks with single injection in terms of perioperative patient satisfaction after scheduled orthopedic ambulatory surgery. Subgroup analyses will be performed, a priori, according to patients Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and type of surgery.
Secondary objectives comprise the assessment of pain, readmission rates, patient mobilization, quality of sleep and heart rate collected by an activity tracker. Scales about quality of recovery will be performed on day 1, about quality of life on day 45 and presence of neuropathic pain will be screened at 3 months. An economic study will also be conducted, including work resumption at 3 months.
This is a multicentric prospective study. Three hundred patients will be randomized in two parallel groups: continuous nerve blocks delivered thru remote-controlled electronic pump versus single local anesthetics injection.
The primary endpoint is the EVAN-G patient satisfaction scale, scored at day 2. Secondary endpoints will include assessment of pain, opiates consumption, sensitivity and motricity scores, rate of catheter falls at home, hospital readmission, patient mobilization, sleep and heart rate as assessed by an activity tracker, PCS before the surgery and Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scale at day 1, Short-Form 36 (SF36) at day 45 and Neuropathic Pain assessment (DN4) at day 90.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Acute postoperative pain is poorly treated. More than three-quarters of patients complain of pain, from moderate to extreme, after surgery. In orthopedic surgery, continuous nerve blocks analgesia has proved effective among in-hospital patients but single injection strategy is easier to implement in the growing outpatient setting.
The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of continuous nerve blocks with single injection in terms of perioperative patient satisfaction after scheduled orthopedic ambulatory surgery. Subgroup analyses will be performed, a priori, according to patients Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and type of surgery.
Secondary objectives comprise the assessment of pain, readmission rates, patient mobilization, quality of sleep and heart rate collected by an activity tracker. Scales about quality of recovery will be performed on day 1, about quality of life on day 45 and presence of neuropathic pain will be screened at 3 months. An economic study will also be conducted, including work resumption at 3 months.
The inclusion criteria are adults undergoing outpatient scheduled orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia with regional analgesia.
Non-inclusion criteria are patients over 80 years, documented cognitive impairment, inability to complete a self-administered questionnaire, presenting American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 3 unsteady or 4, or spontaneously requiring analgesic perineural catheter or a single injection of local anesthetics.
This is a multicentric prospective study. Three hundred patients will be randomized in two parallel groups: continuous nerve blocks delivered thru remote-controlled electronic pump versus single local anesthetics injection.
The primary endpoint is the EVAN-G patient satisfaction scale, scored at day 2. Secondary endpoints will include assessment of pain, opiates consumption, sensitivity and motricity scores, rate of catheter falls at home, hospital readmission, patient mobilization, sleep and heart rate as assessed by an activity tracker, PCS before the surgery and Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scale at day 1, Short-Form 36 (SF36) at day 45 and Neuropathic Pain assessment (DN4) at day 90.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Montpellier, Francia, 34295
- Department of Anesthesiology and critical care, Lapeyronie University Hospital
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female subject aged 18 or more, up to 80 years;
- Undergoing potentially painful scheduled orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia.
- Eligible to outpatient care;
Respecting the ambivalence clause defined below:
- no cons-indication to analgesic perineural catheter;
- not known allergy to local anesthetics;
- likely to be a candidate for continuous nerve block analgesia;
- Ability to complete a self-reported questionnaire;
- Have given written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age less than 18 or more than 80 years;
- Pregnant or nursing women ;
- Not being affiliated to the social security scheme;
- Known allergy to local anesthetics of the amide type;
Regulatory constraints in the outpatient management of perineural catheters not respected:
- Inability of daily nursing care;
- No presence of a responsible adult at home the night of the intervention;
- Scheduled hospital stay;
- ASA physical status score (American Society of Anesthesiologists) above 3 or 3 unsteady;
- Spontaneous request for continuous nerve block or single injection;
- Topic unable to fulfill only a self-administered questionnaire (inability to read French, severe cognitive impairment);
- Subject with cognitive impairment already documented (Alzheimer, dementia, neurological sequelae);
- Topic treated with antipsychotics (neuroleptics or lithium);
- Subject has a documented chronic pain syndrome;
- Active consumer of narcotic topic;
- Topic have not signed informed consent.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Electronic pump
Continuous nerve blocks Remote-controlled perineural local anesthetics delivery
|
Remote-controlled perineural local anesthetics delivery
|
|
Sin intervención: single injection
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient experience and satisfaction scale (EVAN-G)
Periodo de tiempo: Second day after surgery
|
Description: Patient experience and satisfaction scale
|
Second day after surgery
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient quality of recovery (QoR)
Periodo de tiempo: First day after surgery
|
Description: Patient quality of recovery
|
First day after surgery
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Silla de estudio: Xavier CAPDEVILA, M.D., Ph.D., University Hospital, Montpellier
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 9677
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .