A-MCI 或 Vm-AD 患者重复服用 ABvac40 的安全性和免疫原性
一项为期 24 个月的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,针对患有遗忘性轻度认知障碍或极轻度阿尔茨海默病的患者,以调查反复皮下注射 ABvac40 的安全性、耐受性和免疫反应
阿尔茨海默氏病 (AD) 是最常见的痴呆症类型,占全世界估计的 4700 万痴呆症患者的 50-75%。 AD 的淀粉样蛋白级联假说提出,由 Aβ 产生和清除之间的不平衡引起的淀粉样蛋白-β (Aβ) 肽在大脑中的积累是最终导致痴呆的级联反应的起始因素。
Aβ 肽是由淀粉样蛋白前体蛋白 (APP) 的顺序裂解产生的,包括 Aβ40 和 Aβ42。 Aβ40 是分泌型 Aβ 形式中的主要变体 (90%),尽管 Aβ42 更疏水且易于聚集,并且 Aβ42 寡聚体被认为是最具神经毒性的物种,但 Aβ40 也可以产生剧毒的可扩散聚集体,这可以预防在体外通过特异性抗 Aβ40 抗体。
多项研究提出,大脑中高浓度的 Aβ40 可将 AD 患者与患有老年斑但认知正常的患者区分开来,指出 Aβ40 在痴呆发作中的重要性。 与此相一致,之前的研究表明,特定的抗 Aβ40 抗体标记内嗅皮质和 AD 大脑海马体中的 NFT,并且这些不与 tau NFT 共定位,表明存在充满 C 的退化神经元群-Aβx-40 的末端片段。 此外,Aβ40 是脑动脉周围淀粉样蛋白沉积的主要成分,可引起脑淀粉样血管病 (CAA),在 AD 患者中的患病率约为 80-90%(更多信息参见 Lacosta 等人,2008 年)。 阿尔茨海默氏症研究与治疗 (2018) 10:12 DOI 10.1186/s13195-018-0340-8)。
考虑到之前的结果表明靶向 Aβ40 的策略可能代表新的疾病缓解疗法,我们开发了 ABvac40,这是第一个靶向 Aβ40 肽 C 末端的活性疫苗。
这项 II 期研究的目的是在 a-MCI 或 vm-AD 患者中确认 ABvac40 I 期临床试验在 mm-AD 患者中获得的安全性和耐受性水平。 此外,该研究旨在更好地表征 ABvac40 引发的免疫反应,并探索其对 AD 生物标志物的影响。
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 阶段2
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Brescia、意大利、25125
- San Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli
-
-
-
-
-
Montpellier、法国、34295
- CHU de Montpellier
-
Toulouse、法国、31059
- Centre de Recherche Clinique du Gérontopôle
-
-
Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
-
Dijon、Bourgogne-Franche-Comté、法国、21000
- Hôpital François Mitterrand
-
-
-
-
-
Stockholm、瑞典、141 86
- Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset
-
-
-
-
Alicante
-
Alicante、Alicante、西班牙、03010
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
-
-
Barcelona
-
Barcelona、Barcelona、西班牙、08025
- Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau
-
Barcelona、Barcelona、西班牙
- Hospital Del Mar
-
Barcelona、Barcelona、西班牙、08035
- Hospital Vall d'hebrón
-
Barcelona、Barcelona、西班牙、08005
- Barcelona Beta Brain Research Center (BBRC)
-
Barcelona、Barcelona、西班牙、08028
- Fundació ACE
-
Terrassa、Barcelona、西班牙、08221
- Hospital Mutua De Terrasa
-
-
Burgos
-
Burgos、Burgos、西班牙、09006
- Hospital U. de Burgos
-
-
Guipuzcoa
-
Donostia / San Sebastian、Guipuzcoa、西班牙、20014
- Hospital Universitario Donosti
-
-
La Rioja
-
Logroño、La Rioja、西班牙、26006
- Hospital San Pedro
-
-
Lleida
-
Lleida、Lleida、西班牙、25198
- Hospital Santa Maria de Lleida
-
-
Madrid
-
Colmenar Viejo、Madrid、西班牙、28034
- Hospital Ramon y Cajal
-
Madrid、Madrid、西班牙、28040
- Hospital Clinico San Carlos
-
Madrid、Madrid、西班牙、28006
- Complejo Hospitalario Ruber Juan Bravo
-
Madrid、Madrid、西班牙、28010
- Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre
-
-
Navarre
-
Pamplona、Navarre、西班牙、31008
- CUN - Clínica Universidad de Navarra
-
-
Vizcaya
-
Algorta、Vizcaya、西班牙、48993
- CAE Oroitu
-
-
Zaragoza
-
Zaragoza、Zaragoza、西班牙、50009
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
描述
纳入标准:
受试者必须满足以下所有纳入标准:
- 签署知情同意书时年龄在 55 至 80 岁之间的男性或女性,包括这两者。
- 患者(或法定代表人,如适用)和近亲/照顾者必须阅读受试者信息表,同意参加临床试验并签署知情同意书(患者和近亲/照顾者)。
- 有稳定的护理人员参加患者研究访问。
- 根据年龄和受教育程度,简易精神状态检查 (MMSE) 得分在 24 至 30 分(含)之间。
- 临床痴呆评分 (CDR) 量表评分 0.5。
- 神经心理状态评估的可重复电池 (RBANS) 延迟记忆指数 (DMI) 得分为 85 或更低。
- 根据以下标准,患者的 MRI 脑部扫描结果必须与临床 a-MCI 或 vm-AD 的诊断一致:Scheltens 量表,以及白质和既往出血的测量。
- 如果患者正在接受 AD 治疗,则必须在选择就诊前的两个月内保持稳定。
- 伴随疾病的治疗必须在研究治疗之前的前一个月稳定。
- 研究者对候选人遵守研究要求和程序的积极评价。
排除标准:
符合以下任何排除标准的受试者不符合参与研究的资格。
- 已知对疫苗成分过敏或既往有过敏反应史、严重过敏反应或对制剂任何成分过敏史。 对鱼或贝类过敏。
- 活动性传染病(即 乙型肝炎、丙型肝炎)。 阳性梅毒血清学。
- 除轻度湿疹、鼻炎或牛皮癣外,自身免疫性疾病的病史或存在。
- 免疫缺陷的存在或病史(即 艾滋病病毒)。
- 严重的肾脏和/或肝脏疾病。
- 最近 6 个月内有哮喘病史或伴有支气管痉挛的反应性气道疾病,或目前正在接受常规治疗。
- 主要不受控制的全身状况(例如 糖尿病、充血性心力衰竭、高血压)。
- 癌症病史(自上次特定治疗后≤5年)。 例外:碱性细胞癌。
- 血液学、生化或尿液分析参数发生显着变化,尤其是与维生素 B12、叶酸或甲状腺测试水平相关的参数。
- 任何其他中枢神经系统疾病、退行性或非退行性神经或精神疾病的病史,研究者认为这些疾病可能是痴呆的原因,或可能解释认知障碍,或可能直接或通过其影响认知功能治疗。
- 老年抑郁量表(GDS;缩略版),评分 >5
- 在筛选前 6 个月内对 C-SSRS 自杀意念项目 4 或 5 或任何自杀行为回答“是”,或在筛选前的过去 5 年内因自杀行为住院或接受过治疗。
- 脑血管疾病(缺血性或出血性中风、短暂性脑缺血发作)的病史或体征,或根据 NINDS-AIREN 标准诊断出可能、很可能或明确的血管性痴呆。
- MRI 上存在相关模式的微血管疾病(脑白质疏松症、Fazekas 深部白质评分≥2 或整体评分≥4)或不止一处腔隙性或区域性梗死。 研究者认为可能是受试者认知障碍的相关成因的任何其他 MRI 发现。 存在多达 3 个微出血是可以接受的。
- 由研究者确定的出血性疾病史或易感病症、凝血或凝血曲线的临床显着异常结果。
- 正在接受抗凝血剂或抗凝血剂治疗(阿司匹林的预防剂量每天 ≤ 325 mg 或氯吡格雷的剂量 ≤ 75 mg 是允许的)不应在研究中招募患者。
- 改良 Hachinski 缺血量表,得分高于 4。
- 前三个月内的手术(全身麻醉)将被纳入试验,或在研究期间进行。
- 在访问 0 之前的 30 天内用全身性皮质类固醇或其他免疫抑制剂进行治疗。
- 在第一次 IMP 剂量前 2 个月内接种流感疫苗或任何其他疫苗。
- 先前在该试验中被随机分组的患者。
- 在筛选访视之前的 1 个月内参加过另一项临床试验,或者如果受试者参加了旨在改变进展 AD 的研究药物试验,那么在筛选访视最后一次给药后的前 12 个月内参加了另一项临床试验,除非可以提供收到安慰剂的文件。 如果实验药物是免疫治疗药物,包括 IVIG 或抗阿尔茨海默氏病疫苗,则不能将患者纳入研究,除非可以提供接受安慰剂的文件。
- 酒精或药物滥用或依赖的患者。
- 绝对(有起搏器或植入式除颤器)或相对(裸金属支架或在过去六个月内植入支架)MRI 检查禁忌症。 幽闭恐惧症的感觉不要让进行 MRI 或 PET 扫描。
- 不太可能遵守协议的患者(例如,无法返回进行随访)。
- 有生育能力、怀孕或哺乳的妇女。
- EKG 的显着变化会增加患者的风险。
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:交叉作业
- 屏蔽:三倍
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:ABvac40
ABvac40 的六次管理;前五个每 4 周给药一次,第六个在第 42 周给药。
每次给药包括 1mL ABvac40 皮下注射。
|
ABVAC40由AβX-40的偶联物与载载蛋白(KLH)在含有0.35%氢氧化铝作为辅助的磷酸盐缓冲液中载的载体蛋白(KLH)组成。
|
|
安慰剂比较:安慰剂
六次服用安慰剂;前五个每 4 周给药一次,第六个在第 42 周给药。
每次给药包括 1mL 皮下注射不含活性成分的疫苗载体缓冲液。
|
安慰剂包括疫苗的载体(含有0.35%氢氧化铝的磷酸盐缓冲液),而没有结合物。
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
抗Aβ40抗体信号的平均最大增量(ELISA中的光密度[OD])
大体时间:A部分(基线和基线后访问,第2A周,第6A周,第10A周,第14A周,第18A周,第24A周,第40A周,第44A周,第44A周,第50A周,第77A周和第104A周)
|
对于基线访问,血浆抗Aβ40抗体信号(ELISA中的光密度[OD])的平均最大增量(MΔ)。
|
A部分(基线和基线后访问,第2A周,第6A周,第10A周,第14A周,第18A周,第24A周,第40A周,第44A周,第44A周,第50A周,第77A周和第104A周)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
主题由于茶而导致
大体时间:整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
在整个研究期间,由于治疗急性不良事件(TEAE)引起的撤回受试者的数量。
|
整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
|
体格检查中具有显着异常的受试者数量
大体时间:整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
在研究期间报告的体格检查中具有临床意义(CS)异常。
|
整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
|
神经系统检查中临床上明显异常的受试者数量
大体时间:整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
在研究期间,神经系统检查中具有临床意义(CS)异常。
|
整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
|
分析血液学中临床明显异常的受试者数量
大体时间:整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
在研究期间报告的血液学参数异常(CS)异常。
|
整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
|
分析生物化学的临床明显异常的受试者数量
大体时间:整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
研究期间报告的生物化学参数异常(CS)异常。
|
整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
|
凝血中临床上明显异常的受试者数量
大体时间:整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
研究期间报道的凝血参数的临床意义(CS)异常。
|
整个学习持续时间(A部分的第0周至第104周,以及B部分的第77周至第77周)
|
|
哥伦比亚自杀严重性评级量表
大体时间:A部分(第24A周,第50A周,第77A周和第104A周)
|
自上次访问以来,具有自杀意念或自杀行为的受试者。
|
A部分(第24A周,第50A周,第77A周和第104A周)
|
|
Level of Anti-Aβ40 Antibodies in CSF
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of anti-Aβ40 antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included the recorded outcome value as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Anti-Aβ40 Antibodies in Plasma
大体时间:Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of anti-Aβ40 antibodies in plasma from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included the recorded outcome value as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. A compound symmetric variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Antibody-secreting Cells
大体时间:Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of antibody-secreting cells from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included the recorded outcome value as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Aβ40 Peptides in Plasma - ABtest-IA
大体时间:Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of anti-Aβ40 peptides in plasma (ABtest-IA) from baseline to each applicable postbaseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Aβ42 Peptides in Plasma - ABtest-IA
大体时间:Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of anti-Aβ42 peptides in plasma (ABtest-IA) from baseline to each applicable postbaseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Aβ40 Peptides in Plasma - ABtest-MS
大体时间:Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of anti-Aβ40 peptides in plasma (ABtest-MS) from baseline to each applicable postbaseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. A compound symmetric variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Aβ42 Peptides in Plasma - ABtest-MS
大体时间:Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of anti-Aβ42 peptides in plasma (ABtest-MS) from baseline to each applicable postbaseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 2A, Week 6A, Week 10A, Week 14A, Week 18A, Week 24A, Week 40A, Week 44A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Cortical Fibrillary Amyloid Deposition Assessed by a-PET Scans
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in amyloid-PET (a-PET) standard centiloid global cortical area (reference Pons) from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Percentage of Change in Brain Volume
大体时间:Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, and Week 104A)
|
The percent change in brain volume from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Percentage of Change in Hippocampal Volume
大体时间:Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 104A)
|
The percent change in right and left hippocampal volume from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 104A)
|
|
Percentage of Change in Ventricular Volume
大体时间:Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, and Week 104A)
|
The percent change in ventricular volume from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Aβ42 Peptides in CSF
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of Aβ42 peptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from baseline to each applicable postbaseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Aβ40 Peptides in CSF
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of Aβ40 peptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from baseline to each applicable postbaseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Aβ42/Aβ40 Ratio in CSF
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from baseline to each applicable postbaseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Total Tau in CSF
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of total Tau in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from baseline to each applicable postbaseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of p-Tau 181 in CSF
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of p-Tau 181 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Neurofilament Light in CSF
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of neurofilament light in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Level of Neurogranin in CSF
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in levels of neurogranin in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score
大体时间:Part A (baseline, and post-baseline at Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in MMSE score from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a MMRM and the ITT analysis set. MMSE is an 11-question measure that tests 5 areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall, and language. MMSE score ranges: 0-30, with lower scores indicating worst cognition. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (baseline, and post-baseline at Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score
大体时间:Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in CDR-SB score from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a MMRM and the ITT analysis set. CDR-SB assesses 6 cognitive and functional domains: Memory, Orientation, Judgment & Problem Solving, Community Affairs, Home & Hobbies, Personal Care. CDR-SB score ranges: 0-18. The higher scores mean a worst outcome. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Score
大体时间:Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in RBANS total score from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a MMRM and the ITT analysis set. RBANS assesses 5 cognitive domains: Immediate Memory, Visuospatial/constructional, Language, Attention, Delayed Memory. Total score (range 40-160) sums the 5 domain scores. The higher scores mean a better outcome. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living, Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL MCI) Score
大体时间:Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
The change in ADCS-ADL MCI total score from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a MMRM and the ITT analysis set. ADCS-ADL MCI is a 24-item scale that includes 6 basic activities of daily living (ADL) items and 16 instrumental ADL items that provide a total score: 0-78, with a lower score indicating greater severity. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Trail Making Test (TMT) Scores
大体时间:Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
Change in TMT score from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a MMRM and the ITT analysis set. TMT has 2 parts in which the patient connects 25 dots in order as quickly as possible. In TMT-A, targets are numbers 1-25; in TMT-B, targets are numbers 1-13 interleaved with letters A-L. Lower timings indicate better outcome. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, Week 77A, and Week 104A)
|
|
Investigator Global Evaluation (IGE) Score
大体时间:Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, and Week 104A)
|
Change in IGE from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using MMRM and ITT analysis set. IGE at baseline:1-Good general status;2-Slight deterioration;3-Moderate deterioration;4-Bad general status. IGE after baseline:1-Marked improvement;2-Moderate improvement;3-Slight improvement;4-No change;5-Slight worsening;6-Moderate worsening;7-Marked worsening. MMRM included IGE after baseline as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix is used. Following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly significantly associated with response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 24A, Week 50A, and Week 104A)
|
|
EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Overall Severity Index Score
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
Change in EQ-5D-5L overall severity index from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using MMRM and ITT analysis set. EQ-5D-5L has 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression; rated: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
|
EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels - Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-5L - VAS) Score
大体时间:Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
The change in EQ-5D-5L - VAS score from baseline to each applicable post-baseline efficacy visit (Part A) was analyzed using a Mixed-Model Repeated Measures (MMRM), and the ITT analysis set. VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical scale, ranging from 100 = 'Best imaginable health state' down to 0 = 'Worst imaginable health state'. The MMRM included change from baseline in the efficacy parameter as the dependent variable; treatment, protocol-specified visits, treatment-by-visit interaction, and amyloid positivity as the fixed effects; baseline efficacy parameter and baseline age as covariates; and measures within-patient at each visit as a repeated measure. An unstructured variance-covariance matrix was used. The following factors may also have been included in the model: ApoE carrier status, baseline use of AD symptomatic medication and clinical subgroup - MCI or vmAD, if found to be significantly associated with the response measure (p < 0.15). |
Part A (Week 50A and Week 104A)
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
抗Aβ40抗体信号的平均最大增量(ELISA中的光密度[OD]) - 灵敏度
大体时间:A部分(基线和基线后访问,第2A周,第6A周,第10A周,第14A周,第18A周,第24A周,第40A周,第44A周,第44A周,第50A周,第77A周和第104A周)
|
对于基线访问,血浆抗Aβ40抗体信号(ELISA中的光密度[OD])的平均最大增量(MΔ)。 PP(A部分)分析集中的灵敏度分析。 |
A部分(基线和基线后访问,第2A周,第6A周,第10A周,第14A周,第18A周,第24A周,第40A周,第44A周,第44A周,第50A周,第77A周和第104A周)
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 研究主任:Manuel Sarasa、Araclon Biotech Ltd
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.