此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Feasibility of Rapid COVID-19 Testing in Disadvantaged Populations

2021年7月12日 更新者:LaPrincess C. Brewer、Mayo Clinic

Enhancing Rapid Health Response in National Crises: Feasibility of Rapid COVID-19 Testing in Disadvantaged Populations Through Community-Academic Partnerships

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of establishing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing at a federally-qualified health center (FQHC) during a global health crisis to mitigate COVID-19 disparities in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.

研究概览

详细说明

Accurate and early diagnosis of COVID-19 infections are critical for rapid initiation of quarantine interventions to reduce population spread and to provide appropriate medical care to reduce related morbidity and mortality during the current pandemic. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of establishing a drive-through rapid COVID-19 testing site at a federally-qualified health center (FQHC) during a global health crisis to mitigate health consequences in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. The investigators also seek to evaluate the effectiveness of community-driven communication in increasing access to rapid testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in this population. This will inform public health decisions about improving access to testing for SARS-CoV-2 in underserved populations, particularly those receiving care in FQHCs or community health centers.

The specific aims of the study are to:

Aim 1. To determine the feasibility of a community-engaged research partnership to support rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing for symptomatic patients of all ages in the underserved population during the COVID-19 crisis. A rapid testing strategy (drive-through testing site) at a FQHC using Mayo Clinic Laboratory (MCL) diagnostic processing will be piloted.

Aim 2. To compare the effectiveness of community-driven messaging in increasing uptake of rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing compared with usual sources of health information. A simple random sample will be drawn of FQHC patients (N=1000, age 18+) with 1:1 randomization of communication about COVID-19 and availability of rapid testing from the FQHC versus usual sources (control).

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

1000

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester、Minnesota、美国、55905
        • Mayo Clinic

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

All patients receiving care at Open Cities Health Center.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • This study will include all patients receiving clinically indicated testing for COVID-19 at a federally qualified health center (FQHC, Open Cities Health Center, St. Paul, MN).
  • There will be no formal recruitment of patients in this research.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Observational Intervention
Rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy
Rapid testing strategy at an FQHC using Mayo Clinic Laboratory (MCL) diagnostic processing with a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for SARS-CoV-2 and a Mayo Clinic drive-through collection protocol.
Behavioral Intervention
Community-driven messages to promote COVID-19 testing
A one-time communication about the availability of COVID-19 testing at the FQHC to patients randomized to the intervention group using any available means of communication (text and/or mailed letter).

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Intervention Feasibility Measures - FQHC Staff
大体时间:6-months after intervention start
FQHC staff will complete a comprehensive electronic survey adapted from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) instrument to assess feasibility of community-engaged research partnership to support testing site (Weiner BJ, et al. Implementation Science. 2017;12(1):108.).
6-months after intervention start
2. Uptake of rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy at the FQHC- Effectiveness of community-driven messaging to patients
大体时间:6-months after intervention start
Comparison of number of tests completed per group (intervention vs. control)
6-months after intervention start
Uptake of rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy at the FQHC
大体时间:9-months after intervention start
Comparison of number of tests completed per group (intervention vs. control)
9-months after intervention start

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Intervention Satisfaction Measures - Participant Satisfaction with COVID-19 testing
大体时间:6-months after intervention start
All randomized patients will complete a comprehensive survey with questions probing satisfaction with the drive-through testing site (ease of use, process, return of results, etc.).
6-months after intervention start
5. Intervention Satisfaction Measures - Participant Satisfaction with community-driven messaging
大体时间:6-months after intervention start
Compare the satisfaction of community-driven messaging on availability of rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing at the FQHC (intervention vs. control)
6-months after intervention start

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:LaPrincess C Brewer, MD, MPH、Mayo Clinic

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2020年6月3日

初级完成 (实际的)

2021年6月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2021年6月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2020年9月18日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2020年9月18日

首次发布 (实际的)

2020年9月22日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2021年7月13日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2021年7月12日

最后验证

2021年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅