Comparative Evaluation of Pulpal Anaesthetic Efficacy of Different Anaesthetic Solutions for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
2022年2月3日 更新者:Dr. Vivek Aggarwal
Comparative Evaluation of Pulpal Anaesthetic Efficacy of Different Anaesthetic Solutions for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: a Randomized Double-blind Study
Pulpal and periapical inflammation and infection can cause tissue pH in the affected region to be lowered which results in less penetration of anesthetic solution in the nerve membrane and hence delays the onset of anesthesia.
So, the purpose of this study was to compare the pulpal anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine, articaine, mepivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with irreversible pulpitis (IP).
One hundred and twenty adult patients with IP concerning mandibular molars randomly received IANB with either of the three solutions: 2% lidocaine with epinephrine; 4% articaine with epinephrine; 3% plain mepivacaine.
Pain during the endodontic treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS).
Endodontic treatment was initiated.
Success was defined as no or mild pain (pain score≤54mm on Hp VAS) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation.
The anesthetic success rates were analyzed with the chi-square test.
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
120
阶段
- 不适用
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
是的
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- active pain in a mandibular molar
- prolonged response to cold testing with an ice stick and an electric pulp tester
- absence of any periapical radiolucency on radiographs, except for a widened periodontal ligament
- vital coronal pulp on access opening and ability to understand the use of pain scales
Exclusion Criteria:
- known allergy, sensitivity, or contraindications to any opioid or nonopioid analgesic including aspirin or NSAIDs
- history of active peptic ulcer within the preceding 12 months
- history of bleeding problems or anticoagulant use within the last month
- patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding
- a history of known or suspected drug abuse
- patients who had taken NSAIDs within 12 h before administration of the study drugs
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:三倍
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
An inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
|
Inferior alveolar nerve block
|
|
实验性的:Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine with epinephrine
An inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 4% articaine with epinephrine
|
Inferior alveolar nerve block
|
|
实验性的:Inferior Alveolar nerve block with 3% plain mepivacaine
An inferior alveolar nerve block was given with 3% plain mepivacaine
|
Inferior alveolar nerve block
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Anesthetic Success
大体时间:15 minutes after the inferior alveolar nerve block
|
Pain during the endodontic treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS).
Success was defined as no or mild pain (pain score≤54mm on Hp VAS) during access preparation and root canal instrumentation.
|
15 minutes after the inferior alveolar nerve block
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2016年3月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2017年2月28日
研究完成 (实际的)
2017年2月28日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2022年1月24日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2022年2月3日
首次发布 (实际的)
2022年2月14日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2022年2月14日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2022年2月3日
最后验证
2022年2月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.