验证和评估痛苦医学数字工作流程算法(PGS 1.0)
疼痛医学算法数字工作流程算法的前瞻性验证和绩效评估(PGS 1.0)
This is a prospective, non-randomized, double blind, single center, single arm, validation study, to evaluate the performance of PGS 1.0 algorithm in analyzing pain specific symptoms and medical history data of pain patients referred to a pain expert consultation.
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
Background and Rationale:
Chronic pain is a global epidemic. On average, 20% of the Western population suffers from chronic pain, and in some countries, such as the U.S., the number reaches up to 30%. When chronic pain is not properly diagnosed and treated, it leads not only to patient suffering but also to serious comorbidities, increased use of healthcare services, and, in growing numbers, addiction and misuse of prescription drugs.
Pain medicine, a relatively young medical field, offers evidence-based diagnosis and treatment tailored to the patient's pain mechanisms. However, there is a major gap between the large number of patients and the very limited number of pain specialists (around 4,000 in the U.S. and about 80 in Israel). This shortage leads to extremely long waiting times (5-6 months) while patients continue to suffer.
To help close this gap, PG Medical Systems, together with Dr. Simon Wolfson (Head of the Pain Institute at Rambam Health Care Campus), developed an algorithm that analyzes patient symptoms and provides recommendations for pain diagnosis and treatment pathways.
Study Objective:
The study aims to prospectively validate the algorithm's performance by collecting patient data via an online questionnaire at the Rambam Pain Institute. The results will compare the algorithm's diagnoses to those of pain specialists.
Study Procedures:
Patients visiting the Rambam Pain Institute (first-time or follow-up appointments) will be invited to join the study. After signing informed consent, they will complete an online questionnaire with the help of a research assistant. This is a one-time activity, following their medical consultation. The study does not involve additional clinical follow-up. Participation will not affect the patient's diagnosis or treatment.
Duration:
Each participant will spend about 45-60 minutes, including the consent process and questionnaire completion.
Compensation:
Participants will receive 100 NIS for their time.
Data Management and Privacy:
The study will collect only non-identifiable patient data. Each participant will be assigned a code number. Identifying details will remain securely stored at Rambam, linked only by the consent form. This allows for possible follow-up research but ensures that the sponsor company has access only to de-identified data.
Data Security:
All data is stored on Amazon's secure cloud with advanced encryption. Access requires strict authentication, servers are closed to public internet, and only approved private networks can connect. All data is encrypted in transfer and storage. Importantly, the system does not collect identifiable patient information.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Shany Blum, MD PhD
- 电话号码:+972545331773
- 邮箱:shany@pgmeds.com
学习地点
-
-
-
Haifa、以色列、31906
- 招聘中
- Pain Medicine Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus
-
首席研究员:
- Simon Vulfsons, MD
-
接触:
- May Haddad, PhD
- 电话号码:+97247772166
- 邮箱:ma_haddad@rambam.health.gov.il
-
副研究员:
- Amir Minerbi, MD PhD
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
取样方法
研究人群
Male and Female patients aged 18-80, consecutively all patients referred to a pain expert.
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is willing and capable of providing Informed Consent.
- Pain persisting for at least 1 month.
Exclusion Criteria:
None
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 观测模型:CASE_ONLY
- 时间观点:PROSPECTIVE
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Agreement by percent agreement
大体时间:At the completion of patients' enrollment, agreement will be assessed between PGS 1.0 diagnosis and the expert diagnosis per patient (diagnosis of expert at the intake to the pain clinic and PGS 1.0 diagnosis as per the data the patient filled in).
|
Interrater reliability defined as the agreement between the PGS 1.0 algorithm and Pain Expert in rating pain patients' pain diagnosis as measured by percent agreement. |
At the completion of patients' enrollment, agreement will be assessed between PGS 1.0 diagnosis and the expert diagnosis per patient (diagnosis of expert at the intake to the pain clinic and PGS 1.0 diagnosis as per the data the patient filled in).
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Agreement by Cohen's Kappa coefficient.
大体时间:At the completion of patients' enrollment, agreement will be assessed between PGS 1.0 diagnosis and the expert diagnosis per patient (diagnosis of expert at the intake to the pain clinic and PGS 1.0 diagnosis as per the data the patient filled in).
|
Interrater reliability defined as the agreement between the PGS 1.0 algorithm and Pain Expert in rating pain patients' diagnosis as measured by Cohen's Kappa coefficient. |
At the completion of patients' enrollment, agreement will be assessed between PGS 1.0 diagnosis and the expert diagnosis per patient (diagnosis of expert at the intake to the pain clinic and PGS 1.0 diagnosis as per the data the patient filled in).
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Simon Vulfsons, MD、Rambam Health Care Campus
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.