此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Imran Technique for Spinal Anesthesia and Lumbar Puncture (IMRAN-LP)

2026年6月3日 更新者：Wah Medical college , POF hospital

Imran's Approach: A Quasi-Experimental Prospective Comparative Study of an Alternative Positioning Technique for Spinal Anesthesia and Lumbar Puncture

This quasi-experimental prospective clinical trial was conducted to compare the conventional sitting position with the Imran Technique, a novel ergonomic patient-positioning method, for spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture. A total of 200 adult participants requiring spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures or diagnostic lumbar puncture were allocated into two groups. The study aimed to evaluate procedural success, procedural efficiency, patient comfort, operator ergonomics, and procedure-related complications associated with the two positioning techniques.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

This quasi-experimental prospective clinical trial was designed to compare the conventional sitting position and the Imran Technique during spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture procedures. Adult participants aged 18 to 65 years who required spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures or diagnostic lumbar puncture were enrolled and allocated into two groups.

Participants in the control group underwent the procedure using the conventional sitting position, while participants in the intervention group underwent the procedure using the Imran Technique. The primary outcome measure was first-attempt procedural success. Secondary outcome measures included total procedural time, positioning-to-needle insertion time, number of needle attempts, needle redirections, intervertebral space changes, overall procedural success, need for operator assistance, patient comfort, ability to maintain position, operator strain, accessibility of the intervertebral space, and procedure-related complications.

The study was conducted at the Intensive Care Unit of the Department of Anaesthesiology, POF Hospital, Wah Cantt, Pakistan, following Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent procedures.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

200

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

  • 巴基斯坦
    • Punjab Province
      • Wah、Punjab Province、巴基斯坦、4070
        • Wah Medical College, POF Hospital Wah cantt

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult participants aged 18 to 65 years
  • Participants requiring spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures or diagnostic lumbar puncture
  • Participants medically suitable for spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture
  • Participants able to assume and maintain the assigned procedural position
  • Participants who provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 years or above 65 years
  • Previous spinal surgery
  • Significant spinal deformity
  • Local infection at the puncture site
  • Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
  • Raised intracranial pressure
  • Severe hemodynamic instability
  • Inability to maintain the assigned procedural position
  • Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：其他
  • 分配：非随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：无（打开标签）

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器：Conventional Sitting Position
Participants underwent spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture using the conventional sitting position according to standard institutional practice.
程序：Conventional Sitting Position
Standard sitting patient positioning used for spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture procedures.
实验性的：Imran Technique
Participants underwent spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture using the Imran Technique, a novel ergonomic positioning method designed to improve lumbar flexion, operator ergonomics, and procedural access.
程序：Imran Technique
A novel ergonomic patient positioning technique for spinal anesthesia and lumbar puncture involving lateral operator positioning and assisted lumbar flexion to improve procedural access and success.

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
First Attempt Procedural Success
大体时间：During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Successful spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture achieved with a single skin puncture on the first attempt.
During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Total Procedural Time
大体时间：During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Total time required from patient positioning to successful completion of spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture.
During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Number of Needle Attempts
大体时间：During the procedure
Total number of skin puncture attempts required to successfully complete the procedure.
During the procedure
Needle Redirections
大体时间：During the procedure
Number of needle redirections required during spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture.
During the procedure
Intervertebral Space Changes
大体时间：During the procedure
Number of intervertebral space changes required to successfully complete the procedure.
During the procedure
Overall Procedural Success
大体时间：During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Successful completion of spinal anesthesia or lumbar puncture regardless of the number of attempts required.
During the procedure (up to 30 minutes)
Patient Comfort Assessed Using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
大体时间：During the procedure
Participant comfort during positioning and spinal anesthesia/lumbar puncture was assessed using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, where lower scores indicate greater comfort.
During the procedure
Ability to Maintain Position Assessed Using an Investigator-Defined 3-Category Scale
大体时间：During the procedure
Participant ability to maintain the assigned procedural position was assessed using an investigator-defined 3-category scale: Easy, Moderate, or Difficult.
During the procedure
Operator Strain Assessed Using an Investigator-Defined 4-Category Ergonomic Scale
大体时间：During the procedure
Operator physical strain during the procedure was assessed using an investigator-defined 4-category scale: None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe.
During the procedure
Accessibility of Intervertebral Space Assessed Using an Investigator-Defined 3-Category Operator Rating Scale
大体时间：During the procedure
Accessibility of the intervertebral space was assessed by the operator using an investigator-defined 3-category scale: Easy, Acceptable, or Difficult.
During the procedure
Procedure-Related Complications
大体时间：uring the procedure and immediately after procedure (up to 1 hour)
Occurrence of procedure-related events including paresthesia, bloody tap, hypotension, bradycardia, or procedural failure.
uring the procedure and immediately after procedure (up to 1 hour)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Wah Medical college , POF hospital

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Imran Ul Haq, MBBS, FCPS、Wah Medical College (NUMS) / POF Hospital Wah Cantt, Pakistan

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年3月2日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年3月31日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年3月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月27日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月3日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月4日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月4日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月3日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • WMC-IRB-157-2026
  • IRB Approval Number (其他标识符：TMU-JIRB N202410073)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

是的

IPD 计划说明

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the published article, after de-identification.

IPD 共享时间框架

Beginning 1 year after publication

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅