此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Reliability and Concordance of 15-metre (15-m) Sprint Performance on Sand and Firm Surfaces

2026年6月9日 更新者:Édison Andrés Pérez Bedoya、Federal University of Vicosa

Within-Session and Between-Day Reliability of the 15-metre (15-m) Sprint on Sand and Firm Surfaces, and Concordance Between Conditions, in Male Beach-Sport Athletes

This observational repeated-measures methodological study evaluated the reliability and agreement of a 15-m linear sprint test performed on sand and firm surfaces in male beach-sport athletes. Participants completed three maximal sprint attempts on each surface during up to two testing sessions conducted on separate days.

The study examined trial-to-trial reliability within each session, stability between testing days, and concordance between sprint times obtained on sand and firm surfaces. No therapeutic or training intervention was administered. Sand and firm surfaces were used exclusively as assessment conditions.

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

Male athletes participating in beach soccer, beach volleyball, or beach handball completed three maximal 15-m linear sprint attempts on both sand and firm surfaces. Each attempt was performed from a standardised standing start, with at least two minutes of passive recovery between attempts.

Testing comprised up to two sessions per participant on separate days. The order of the surface conditions was counterbalanced to reduce potential order and fatigue effects. Participants who attended two sessions completed the surfaces in the opposite order during the second session.

The primary measured variable was 15-m sprint time in seconds. The arithmetic mean of the three attempts and the fastest individual attempt were calculated for each surface and session. Within-session and between-day reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficients of variation, standard errors of measurement, typical errors, and minimal detectable changes. Agreement between sand and firm-surface measurements was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

16

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Antioquia
      • Guarne、Antioquia、哥伦比亚、054080
        • Universidad de Antioquia

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

The study population consisted of male athletes participating in beach soccer, beach volleyball, or beach handball in Antioquia, Colombia. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling based on their availability during the data-collection period. Eligible athletes had completed at least six months of regular beach-sport training. Athletes with a musculoskeletal injury during the preceding six weeks, an acute illness during the preceding seven days, or who were unable to complete at least one full testing session were excluded.

描述

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male athlete participating in beach soccer, beach volleyball, or beach handball.
  • Minimum of six months of regular beach-sport training.
  • Able to complete maximal 15-m sprint assessments on sand and firm surfaces.
  • Provision of written informed consent before participation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Musculoskeletal injury during the six weeks preceding testing.
  • Acute illness during the seven days preceding testing.
  • Failure to complete at least one full testing session.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
Male Beach-Sport Athletes
Sixteen male athletes participating in beach soccer, beach volleyball, or beach handball completed repeated 15-m sprint assessments on both sand and firm surfaces. Each participant performed three maximal sprint attempts per surface during each completed testing session. Ten participants completed two sessions on separate days, and six participants completed one session. No therapeutic or training intervention was administered; sand and firm surfaces were used exclusively as repeated assessment conditions to evaluate sprint-test reliability and between-surface concordance.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean 15-m Sprint Time on Sand and Firm Surfaces
大体时间:During up to two testing sessions, each lasting approximately 45 minutes, conducted on separate days within one week.
Time, measured in seconds, required to complete a maximal 15-metre linear sprint. For each surface and testing session, the outcome was calculated as the arithmetic mean of three maximal sprint attempts. For the between-surface analysis, one participant-level value per surface was derived by averaging session means for participants who completed two sessions or by using the single available session for participants who completed one session.
During up to two testing sessions, each lasting approximately 45 minutes, conducted on separate days within one week.

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Within-Session Reliability of 15-m Sprint Time
大体时间:Across the three sprint attempts performed during each surface condition within a single testing session (45 minutes).
Trial-to-trial reliability of the three sprint attempts performed on each surface within each testing session, quantified using the absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(A,1)], coefficient of variation, standard error of measurement, typical error, and 95% minimal detectable change.
Across the three sprint attempts performed during each surface condition within a single testing session (45 minutes).
Between-Day Reliability of 15-m Sprint Time
大体时间:Across two testing sessions conducted on separate days within one week (each of 45 minutes).
Stability of mean sprint time between two testing sessions conducted on separate days, quantified using the absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(A,1)], coefficient of variation, standard error of measurement, typical error, and 95% minimal detectable change.
Across two testing sessions conducted on separate days within one week (each of 45 minutes).
Concordance Between Sand and Firm-Surface Sprint Times
大体时间:Participant-level measurements derived from up to two testing sessions conducted within one week (each of 45 minutes).
Agreement between participant-level mean 15-m sprint times obtained on sand and firm surfaces, evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman systematic bias and 95% limits of agreement.
Participant-level measurements derived from up to two testing sessions conducted within one week (each of 45 minutes).
Best 15-m Sprint Time on Sand and Firm Surfaces
大体时间:During up to two testing sessions, each lasting approximately 45 minutes, conducted on separate days within one week.
Fastest time, measured in seconds, recorded from the three maximal 15-metre sprint attempts performed on each surface during each testing session.
During up to two testing sessions, each lasting approximately 45 minutes, conducted on separate days within one week.

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年3月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年3月15日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年3月15日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月5日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月5日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月10日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月11日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月9日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • SANDSPRINT-OBS-01

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the publication may be shared upon reasonable request. Requests will be evaluated by the principal investigator and the responsible institution, considering the scientific purpose of the proposed use, participant confidentiality, ethical requirements, and compliance with applicable data-protection regulations. Data will be provided only after approval of the request and completion of an appropriate data-use agreement.

IPD 共享时间框架

Data may be made available beginning after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for five years.

IPD 共享访问标准

Researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal may request access to the de-identified data. Requests must describe the research objectives, planned analyses, data-security procedures, and intended outputs. Access will be subject to approval by the principal investigator and the responsible institution, as well as completion of a data-use agreement.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 树液
  • 分析代码

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅