此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in RIRS

2026年8月2日 更新者:Zeinab Mustafa Sayed、South Valley University

Comparative Study of General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Impact of Stone Size on Perioperative Outcomes

The impact of anesthesia type on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) outcomes remains a subject of ongoing debate. Several studies have compared general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) in endourological procedures, with conflicting results regarding operative time, complication rates, and stone-free outcomes. Importantly, the interaction between anesthesia type and stone characteristics-particularly stone size-has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of general versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing RIRS at Qena University Hospital, with particular emphasis on the effect of stone size stratification on perioperative outcomes.

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

Urolithiasis is a common urological condition with a rising global incidence and prevalence, largely attributed to lifestyle, dietary factors, and metabolic disorders. The lifetime risk of developing urinary stones is estimated to be approximately 10-15%, with a high recurrence rate that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems. Advances in minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized the management of renal calculi, with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) emerging as a safe and effective modality for treating renal stones of varying sizes and locations.

RIRS, performed using flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy, has gained widespread acceptance due to its minimally invasive nature, reduced morbidity, and favorable stone-free rates. It is particularly advantageous for managing stones less than 2 cm, although its indications have expanded to include larger and more complex stones in selected cases. Despite these advantages, several factors influence the success and safety of RIRS, including stone size, location, density, surgeon experience, and perioperative management strategies.

Among perioperative factors, the choice of anesthesia plays a critical role in determining surgical conditions and patient outcomes. General anesthesia (GA) is traditionally preferred for RIRS as it provides optimal airway control, complete immobility, and controlled ventilation, thereby facilitating precise endoscopic manipulation. In contrast, spinal anesthesia (SA) has been proposed as an alternative due to its advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, and avoidance of airway-related complications. However, concerns remain regarding its limitations, including patient movement, inadequate control of respiration, and hemodynamic instability.

By evaluating stone-free rates and perioperative complications across different stone size categories, this study seeks to provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing anesthesia selection in RIRS.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

252

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Qena Governorate
      • Qina、Qena Governorate、埃及、83511
        • Qena University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

取样方法

概率样本

研究人群

All eligible patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective RIRS for renal stones <2 cm.
  • Written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous ureteral surgery or known ureteral stricture.
  • Multiple or bilateral renal stones requiring staged procedures.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
General Anesthesia
patients in this group receive general anesthesia for RIRS: Intravenous anesthetic induction, Endotracheal intubation, controlled ventilation, muscle relaxation and inhalational anesthetic maintenance.
Spinal Anesthesia
patients in this group receive spinal anesthesia for RIRS: Standard spinal block using bupivacaine without sedation.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Stone Free Rate
大体时间:after the first postoperative month.
Follow-up Ultrasound/Computed Tomography (US/CT) to assess stone-free status after the first postoperative month. Success was considered as residues of <2mm or absence of any stone fragments.
after the first postoperative month.
Total opioid consumption
大体时间:Perioperative
Total opioid consumption in the whole postoperative period is recorded
Perioperative

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Pain assessement
大体时间:at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours
pain is assessed uing Numerical Rating Scale where patients are asked to select a number from 0 to 10 to quantify their pain level where 0= no pain at all and 10= worst pain imaginable
at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours
Patient Satisfaction
大体时间:Perioperative
patients are asked to evaluate their satisfaction using a simple 4 point likert scale, where 4= Very Satisfied, 3= Satisfied, 2= Dissatisfied, 1= Very Dissatisfied
Perioperative
PACU stay
大体时间:Perioperative
the duration of stay in PACU (postanesthetic care unit) is recorded
Perioperative

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2022年4月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2025年2月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2025年2月15日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月15日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月18日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月24日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月4日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月2日

最后验证

2026年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • AIP02942673

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅