Blended vs Conventional Training for ACLS
2026年6月25日 更新者：Min Ding、Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University
Blended Learning Approach Versus Conventional Training in Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The investigators conducted a stratified randomized controlled trial with an embedded cost-effectiveness analysis at a tertiary hospital in China.
Participants were randomized to either traditional instructor-led ACLS training (ILT ACLS) or blended-learning HeartCode ACLS training (HC ACLS).
The primary outcome was the overall first-attempt ACLS certification pass rate.
A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the institutional perspective using certification pass rate as the effectiveness measure.
Costs estimation included program delivery costs and productivity losses associated with participant training time.
研究概览
地位
完全的
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
95
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Shanghai Municipality
-
Shanghai、Shanghai Municipality、中国、200120
- Shanghai East Hospital Affiliated To Tongji University
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
是的
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Second-year resident physicians and nurses
- Working in the emergency, critical care, or anesthesiology departments
- Valid Basic Life Support (BLS) certification
- No prior Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) training
- Physical ability to perform chest compressions, bag-mask ventilation, and defibrillation
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals without a valid BLS certification
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：HeartCode ACLS
Participants received blended-learning HeartCode ACLS training, which combines online self-paced modules with hands-on practice sessions.
|
A blended-learning ACLS course combining online HeartCode self-paced modules with instructor-facilitated hands-on practice sessions.
|
|
有源比较器：Instructor-Led ACLS Training
Participants received traditional instructor-led ACLS training (ILT ACLS) delivered entirely in-person by certified instructors.
|
A traditional, entirely in-person ACLS course delivered by certified instructors, following standard American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, without online pre-learning components.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall First-Attempt ACLS Certification Pass Rate
大体时间：Up to 2 days.
|
The proportion of participants who pass the ACLS certification examination on their first attempt after completing the assigned training program.
|
Up to 2 days.
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
First-Attempt Pass Rate for Individual Assessments
大体时间：Up to 2 days.
|
Proportion of participants who pass each of the three individual assessments (high-quality BLS, airway management, and Megacode) on the first attempt.
|
Up to 2 days.
|
|
CPR Quality - Compression Depth
大体时间：Up to 2 days.
|
Mean chest compression depth (mm) recorded during Megacode assessment, measured by high-fidelity manikin with QCPR technology.
|
Up to 2 days.
|
|
CPR Quality - Compression Rate
大体时间：Up to 2 days.
|
Mean chest compression rate (compressions per minute) recorded during Megacode assessment.
|
Up to 2 days.
|
|
CPR Quality - Chest Recoil
大体时间：Up to 2 days.
|
Proportion of compressions with adequate chest recoil (percentage) recorded during Megacode assessment.
|
Up to 2 days.
|
|
Training Cost per Participant
大体时间：Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
|
Mean total training cost per participant (in RMB), including program delivery costs (equipment, facilities, materials, personnel) and productivity losses.
|
Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
|
|
Participant Satisfaction
大体时间：Up to 2 days.
|
Learner satisfaction measured using the AHA ACLS Classroom Course Evaluation Form, completed immediately after course completion.
|
Up to 2 days.
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Min Ding, MMED、Department of Post-Graduate Education, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2024年7月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2024年12月31日
研究完成 (实际的)
2024年12月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年6月16日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年6月25日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年6月26日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年6月26日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年6月25日
最后验证
2026年6月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
不
IPD 计划说明
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the informed consent did not include provisions for data sharing.
Additionally, data sharing is restricted by applicable Chinese privacy laws (Personal Information Protection Law) regarding personal performance data.
Given the single-center design and moderate sample size, the generalizability of the data is limited, and the study does not involve investigational products or regulatory submission.
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.