此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Smartphone-Based Digital Literacy Training for Older Adults

2026年7月8日 更新者:Barış Kılıç、Akdeniz University

Smartphone-based Digital Literacy Training for Older Adults in a Lifelong-learning Setting: a Nonrandomised Wait-list-controlled Study With 3-month Follow-up

This study examined whether a structured, classroom-based smartphone training programme can improve digital literacy and confidence in using a smartphone among adults aged 60 years and older enrolled in a lifelong-learning programme. The study used a non-randomised, wait-list-controlled design with two existing class cohorts: one cohort received the training first (intervention group), and the other continued with its usual programme activities and served as a comparison (wait-list control group). Digital literacy and smartphone self-efficacy were measured before the training, immediately after the training, and again three months later. The aim was to determine whether older adults who took part in the training showed greater improvement than those who did not.

研究概览

详细说明

The training programme consisted of 12 sessions delivered over 6 weeks (two sessions per week, each lasting 90 to 105 minutes). Content was mapped to the DigComp 2.2 digital competence framework and covered practical smartphone skills for everyday life. Sessions used participants' own Android smartphones together with a projector for demonstration, a class messaging group for support, and between-session practice tasks. The intervention arm comprised the advanced-level cohort of the Akdeniz University 60+ Refresher (Tazelenme) University, and the wait-list control arm comprised the second-year cohort of the same programme.

Two instruments were used. Digital literacy was assessed with the Digital Literacy Scale (score range 12 to 60), the primary outcome. Smartphone self-efficacy was assessed with the Smartphone Self-Efficacy Scale (score range 20 to 100), a secondary outcome. Both were administered at baseline (T1), immediately after the intervention (T2), and at three-month follow-up (T3). Programme satisfaction was assessed with a short questionnaire after the intervention.

The primary analysis used a baseline-adjusted linear mixed model on the full analysis set, including a group-by-baseline interaction and adjustment for age, sex, education, and marital status. Robustness was examined through several pre-specified sensitivity analyses, including per-protocol analysis, difference-in-differences, propensity-score overlap weighting, multiple imputation, and a conservative worst-case (missing-not-at-random) analysis.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

140

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 60 years or older
  • Enrolled in the Akdeniz University 60+ Refresher (Tazelenme) University programme
  • Owns and regularly uses an smartphone
  • Able to attend the scheduled training sessions
  • Provides written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive, visual, or hearing impairment that would prevent participation in the training

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Smartphone-based digital literacy training
Advanced-level cohort receiving a structured smartphone training programme: 12 sessions over 6 weeks (two sessions per week, 90 to 105 minutes each), mapped to the DigComp 2.2 framework, using participants' own Android smartphones.
Instructor-led smartphone training delivered in 12 sessions over 6 weeks (twice weekly, 90 to 105 minutes), mapped to the DigComp 2.2 framework, using participants' own Android smartphones, a projector for demonstration, a class messaging group, and between-session practice tasks.
无干预:Wait-list control
Second-year cohort continuing usual programme activities with the training deferred; served as the comparison group.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Digital Literacy Scale (DLS) score
大体时间:Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (approximately week 6, T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Digital literacy assessed with the Digital Literacy Scale. Scores range from a minimum of 12 to a maximum of 60. Higher scores indicate greater digital literacy (a better outcome).
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (approximately week 6, T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Smartphone Self-Efficacy Scale (SSES) score
大体时间:Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (approximately week 6, T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Smartphone self-efficacy assessed with the Smartphone Self-Efficacy Scale. Scores range from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 100. Higher scores indicate greater smartphone self-efficacy (a better outcome).
Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (approximately week 6, T2), and 3-month follow-up (T3)
Programme satisfaction
大体时间:Immediately post-intervention (approximately week 6, T2)
Participant satisfaction with the training programme, assessed with a 10-item satisfaction questionnaire. Scores range from a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 50. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction (a better outcome).
Immediately post-intervention (approximately week 6, T2)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 研究主任:Gülüşan Özgün Başıbüyük、Akdeniz University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年4月15日

初级完成 (实际的)

2025年8月22日

研究完成 (实际的)

2025年8月22日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月4日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月8日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月9日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月9日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月8日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • TBAEK-181

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

De-identified individual participant data underlying the reported results are available from the corresponding author (B.K.) on reasonable request, subject to ethics and participant-confidentiality restrictions. The analysis code is likewise available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

IPD 共享时间框架

Available beginning after publication of the main results, with no fixed end date.

IPD 共享访问标准

Requests are reviewed by the corresponding author (B.K.). De-identified data and analytic code will be shared with researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal and sign a data-access and confidentiality agreement, subject to applicable ethics approvals and participant-confidentiality restrictions.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 分析代码

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅