此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

A Comparative Study of Fusional Vergence According to Ocular Dominance in Healthy Subjects (ECAFOSS)

2026年8月25日 更新者：Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

In orthoptics, fusional vergence (FV) measurement is one of the key tests used to assess fusion ability. These amplitudes are generally reduced in individuals with convergence insufficiency. Fusional vergence are quantified by placing a prism bar randomly in front of one eye-first for distance vision and then for near vision. Rehabilitation exercises using the prism bar are also performed in the same manner.

Depending on orthoptic practice, the prism bar is placed in front of the left eye or the right eye, in a dogmatic manner, or in front of the right eye, in a conventional manner, without any study providing any justification. However, some practitioners report interocular differences when measuring fusion amplitudes depending on which eye is prismed, while others do not.

The hypothesis put forward is that, in individuals with an interocular difference in fusional vergence, ocular dominance (sensory and motor) could be the cause of this measurement discrepancy.

The objective is therefore to compare the difference in fusional vergence depending on whether the dominant or non-dominant eye is tested, using a randomized order of eyes and tests.

If this hypothesis is confirmed (greater fusional vergence when tested on the dominant eye), this would: (1) enhance our understanding of fusion mechanisms, (2) provide more targeted insights for the assessment, quantification, and rehabilitation of fusional vergence to improve the effectiveness of orthoptic intervention.

研究概览

地位

招聘中

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

In orthoptics, fusional vergence (FV) measurement is one of the key tests used to assess fusion ability. These amplitudes are generally reduced in individuals with convergence insufficiency. Fusional vergence are quantified by placing a prism bar randomly in front of one eye-first for distance vision and then for near vision. Rehabilitation exercises using the prism bar are also performed in the same manner.

Depending on orthoptic practice, the prism bar is placed in front of the left eye or the right eye, in a dogmatic manner, or in front of the right eye, in a conventional manner, without any study providing any justification. However, some practitioners report interocular differences when measuring fusion amplitudes depending on which eye is prismed, while others do not.

The hypothesis put forward is that, in individuals with an interocular difference in fusional vergence, ocular dominance (sensory and motor) could be the cause of this measurement discrepancy.

The objective is therefore to compare the difference in fusional vergence depending on whether the dominant or non-dominant eye is tested, using a randomized order of eyes and tests.

If this hypothesis is confirmed (greater fusional vergence when tested on the dominant eye), this would: (1) enhance our understanding of fusion mechanisms, (2) provide more targeted insights for the assessment, quantification, and rehabilitation of fusional vergence to improve the effectiveness of orthoptic intervention.

The study consists of one-hour eye examinations of healthy individuals with no visual or oculomotor disorders.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

60

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

  • 法国
      • Paris、法国、75015
        • 招聘中
        • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
        • 接触：

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人

接受健康志愿者

是的

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Any individual between the ages of 18 and 35, inclusive, with no organic ophthalmological disorders or oculomotor disorders.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults between the ages of 18 and 35 with no known eye conditions, with or without ametropia. If ametropia is present: it must be corrected
  • Subjects with no history of eye surgery, including refractive surgery
  • Subjects who have been informed about the study and have freely and knowingly consented to participate in the study and to the collection of data

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with strabismus
  • Subjects with visual acuity of less than 20/20; or anisometropia

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Healthy individual
Individuals with no visual or oculomotor disorders.
其他：Fusional Vergence assessment
Measurement of sensorimotor fusional vergence in the right and left eyes, in divergence and convergence, first for distance vision and then for near vision. A random draw will determine which eye is tested first for distance vision, followed by a second draw for near vision, in order to minimize training bias. Prior to this, a stereoscopic acuity test will be performed to confirm the presence of binocular vision.
其他名称：
  • Measurements of sensorimotor fusion
其他：Ocular dominance evaluation

Assessment of ocular dominance for:

  • The dominant eye using the monocular blurriness test and the red-glass test
  • The leading eye using the Mawas plate Punctum Proximum convergence test and the bilateral prismatic test for oculomotor dominance
  • The preferred eye using the spontaneous ocular method
  • The target eye using the Hole-in-Card method: hole-in-card test
其他名称：
  • Assessment of ocular dominance
其他：Complete Orthoptic

Conducting an orthoptic evaluation to verify that patients meet the study's inclusion criteria:

  • assessment of visual acuity and refraction
  • assessment of stereoscopic vision
  • cover-test to screen potential abnormal phorias
  • measurement of interpupillary distance
其他名称：
  • Orthoptic evaluation

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Amplitude of fusional vergence
大体时间：Day 0
Values of horizontal fusional vergence measured using a horizontal Berens prism bar in divergence and convergence, for distance and near vision, in the right eye and the left eye and reported in prism diopters.
Day 0
Laterality ocular dominance
大体时间：Day 0

Assessment of ocular dominance for:

  • The dominant eye using the monocular blur test and the red-glass test
  • The leading eye using the Punctum Proximum of Convergence (PPC) test with the Mawas plate and bilateral prism test for oculomotor dominance
  • The preferred eye using the spontaneous ocular method
  • The target eye using the Hole-in-Card method: hole-in-card test All tests classify the ocular dominance into 3 categories : Left, Right, None.
Day 0
Lateralization quotient value (LQ)
大体时间：Day 0
Determination of the lateralization quotient value by the mean of previous responses of the ocular dominance tests.
Day 0

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Assessment of the degree of agreement among the various tests for ocular dominance
大体时间：Day 0
Compilation of responses to ocular dominance tests (sensorial and motor dominant eye, target eye and preferred eye) and lateralization quotient.
Day 0
Agreeement between the bilateral prismatic test (new test for oculomotor dominance laterality determination and standard ocular dominance tests
大体时间：Day 0
Evaluation of a new test (bilateral prismatic test for oculomotor dominance) and comparison to usually ocular dominance test. All tests classify the ocular dominance into 3 categories : Left, Right, None. This part tends to evaluation the efficacity and the utility of a new test for ocular dominance.
Day 0
Assessment of the difference in fusional vergence measurements between the right and left eyes and the laterality quotient
大体时间：Day 0
Assessment of the difference in fusional vergence measurements between the right and left eyes and the laterality quotient.
Day 0
Correlation between inter-pupillary distance measurements and differences in fusion amplitude measurements between the right and left eyes
大体时间：Day 0
Measurements of interpupillary distance and overall fusion ability, for distance vision and near vision.
Day 0

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

合作者

URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Maxence Rateaux, PhD、Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • 研究主任：Dominique MD, PhD BREMOND-GIGNAC、Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年8月20日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年6月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年6月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月6日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月13日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月26日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月25日

最后验证

2026年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • APHP251987
  • 2025-A02953-46 (其他标识符：ID RCB number)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅