Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

A Comparative Study of Fusional Vergence According to Ocular Dominance in Healthy Subjects (ECAFOSS)

6. juli 2026 opdateret af: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

In orthoptics, fusional vergence (FV) measurement is one of the key tests used to assess fusion ability. These amplitudes are generally reduced in individuals with convergence insufficiency. Fusional vergence are quantified by placing a prism bar randomly in front of one eye-first for distance vision and then for near vision. Rehabilitation exercises using the prism bar are also performed in the same manner.

Depending on orthoptic practice, the prism bar is placed in front of the left eye or the right eye, in a dogmatic manner, or in front of the right eye, in a conventional manner, without any study providing any justification. However, some practitioners report interocular differences when measuring fusion amplitudes depending on which eye is prismed, while others do not.

The hypothesis put forward is that, in individuals with an interocular difference in fusional vergence, ocular dominance (sensory and motor) could be the cause of this measurement discrepancy.

The objective is therefore to compare the difference in fusional vergence depending on whether the dominant or non-dominant eye is tested, using a randomized order of eyes and tests.

If this hypothesis is confirmed (greater fusional vergence when tested on the dominant eye), this would: (1) enhance our understanding of fusion mechanisms, (2) provide more targeted insights for the assessment, quantification, and rehabilitation of fusional vergence to improve the effectiveness of orthoptic intervention.

Studieoversigt

Status

Ikke rekrutterer endnu

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

In orthoptics, fusional vergence (FV) measurement is one of the key tests used to assess fusion ability. These amplitudes are generally reduced in individuals with convergence insufficiency. Fusional vergence are quantified by placing a prism bar randomly in front of one eye-first for distance vision and then for near vision. Rehabilitation exercises using the prism bar are also performed in the same manner.

Depending on orthoptic practice, the prism bar is placed in front of the left eye or the right eye, in a dogmatic manner, or in front of the right eye, in a conventional manner, without any study providing any justification. However, some practitioners report interocular differences when measuring fusion amplitudes depending on which eye is prismed, while others do not.

The hypothesis put forward is that, in individuals with an interocular difference in fusional vergence, ocular dominance (sensory and motor) could be the cause of this measurement discrepancy.

The objective is therefore to compare the difference in fusional vergence depending on whether the dominant or non-dominant eye is tested, using a randomized order of eyes and tests.

If this hypothesis is confirmed (greater fusional vergence when tested on the dominant eye), this would: (1) enhance our understanding of fusion mechanisms, (2) provide more targeted insights for the assessment, quantification, and rehabilitation of fusional vergence to improve the effectiveness of orthoptic intervention.

The study consists of one-hour eye examinations of healthy individuals with no visual or oculomotor disorders.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

60

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

  • Frankrig
      • Paris, Frankrig, 75015
        • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
        • Kontakt:

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Any individual between the ages of 18 and 35, inclusive, with no organic ophthalmological disorders or oculomotor disorders.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults between the ages of 18 and 35 with no known eye conditions, with or without ametropia. If ametropia is present: it must be corrected
  • Subjects with no history of eye surgery, including refractive surgery
  • Subjects who have been informed about the study and have freely and knowingly consented to participate in the study and to the collection of data

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with strabismus
  • Subjects with visual acuity of less than 20/20; or anisometropia

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
Healthy individual
Individuals with no visual or oculomotor disorders.
Andet: Fusional Vergence assessment
Measurement of sensorimotor fusional vergence in the right and left eyes, in divergence and convergence, first for distance vision and then for near vision. A random draw will determine which eye is tested first for distance vision, followed by a second draw for near vision, in order to minimize training bias. Prior to this, a stereoscopic acuity test will be performed to confirm the presence of binocular vision.
Andre navne:
  • Measurements of sensorimotor fusion
Andet: Ocular dominance evaluation

Assessment of ocular dominance for:

  • The dominant eye using the monocular blurriness test and the red-glass test
  • The leading eye using the Mawas plate Punctum Proximum convergence test and the bilateral prismatic test for oculomotor dominance
  • The preferred eye using the spontaneous ocular method
  • The target eye using the Hole-in-Card method: hole-in-card test
Andre navne:
  • Assessment of ocular dominance
Andet: Complete Orthoptic

Conducting an orthoptic evaluation to verify that patients meet the study's inclusion criteria:

  • assessment of visual acuity and refraction
  • assessment of stereoscopic vision
  • cover-test to screen potential abnormal phorias
  • measurement of interpupillary distance
Andre navne:
  • Orthoptic evaluation

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Amplitude of fusional vergence
Tidsramme: Day 0
Values of horizontal fusional vergence measured using a horizontal Berens prism bar in divergence and convergence, for distance and near vision, in the right eye and the left eye and reported in prism diopters.
Day 0
Laterality ocular dominance
Tidsramme: Day 0

Assessment of ocular dominance for:

  • The dominant eye using the monocular blur test and the red-glass test
  • The leading eye using the Punctum Proximum of Convergence (PPC) test with the Mawas plate and bilateral prism test for oculomotor dominance
  • The preferred eye using the spontaneous ocular method
  • The target eye using the Hole-in-Card method: hole-in-card test All tests classify the ocular dominance into 3 categories : Left, Right, None.
Day 0
Lateralization quotient value (LQ)
Tidsramme: Day 0
Determination of the lateralization quotient value by the mean of previous responses of the ocular dominance tests.
Day 0

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Assessment of the degree of agreement among the various tests for ocular dominance
Tidsramme: Day 0
Compilation of responses to ocular dominance tests (sensorial and motor dominant eye, target eye and preferred eye) and lateralization quotient.
Day 0
Agreeement between the bilateral prismatic test (new test for oculomotor dominance laterality determination and standard ocular dominance tests
Tidsramme: Day 0
Evaluation of a new test (bilateral prismatic test for oculomotor dominance) and comparison to usually ocular dominance test. All tests classify the ocular dominance into 3 categories : Left, Right, None. This part tends to evaluation the efficacity and the utility of a new test for ocular dominance.
Day 0
Assessment of the difference in fusional vergence measurements between the right and left eyes and the laterality quotient
Tidsramme: Day 0
Assessment of the difference in fusional vergence measurements between the right and left eyes and the laterality quotient.
Day 0
Correlation between inter-pupillary distance measurements and differences in fusion amplitude measurements between the right and left eyes
Tidsramme: Day 0
Measurements of interpupillary distance and overall fusion ability, for distance vision and near vision.
Day 0

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Samarbejdspartnere

URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Maxence Rateaux, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Studieleder: Dominique MD, PhD BREMOND-GIGNAC, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

1. september 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. juli 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. juli 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

22. juni 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

6. juli 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

13. juli 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

13. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

6. juli 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juni 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • APHP251987
  • 2025-A02953-46 (Anden identifikator: ID RCB number)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Ingen øjenlidelse

Kliniske forsøg med Fusional Vergence assessment

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Dominican Republic

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

3
Abonner