- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07697131
A Comparative Study of Fusional Vergence According to Ocular Dominance in Healthy Subjects (ECAFOSS)
In orthoptics, fusional vergence (FV) measurement is one of the key tests used to assess fusion ability. These amplitudes are generally reduced in individuals with convergence insufficiency. Fusional vergence are quantified by placing a prism bar randomly in front of one eye-first for distance vision and then for near vision. Rehabilitation exercises using the prism bar are also performed in the same manner.
Depending on orthoptic practice, the prism bar is placed in front of the left eye or the right eye, in a dogmatic manner, or in front of the right eye, in a conventional manner, without any study providing any justification. However, some practitioners report interocular differences when measuring fusion amplitudes depending on which eye is prismed, while others do not.
The hypothesis put forward is that, in individuals with an interocular difference in fusional vergence, ocular dominance (sensory and motor) could be the cause of this measurement discrepancy.
The objective is therefore to compare the difference in fusional vergence depending on whether the dominant or non-dominant eye is tested, using a randomized order of eyes and tests.
If this hypothesis is confirmed (greater fusional vergence when tested on the dominant eye), this would: (1) enhance our understanding of fusion mechanisms, (2) provide more targeted insights for the assessment, quantification, and rehabilitation of fusional vergence to improve the effectiveness of orthoptic intervention.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
In orthoptics, fusional vergence (FV) measurement is one of the key tests used to assess fusion ability. These amplitudes are generally reduced in individuals with convergence insufficiency. Fusional vergence are quantified by placing a prism bar randomly in front of one eye-first for distance vision and then for near vision. Rehabilitation exercises using the prism bar are also performed in the same manner.
Depending on orthoptic practice, the prism bar is placed in front of the left eye or the right eye, in a dogmatic manner, or in front of the right eye, in a conventional manner, without any study providing any justification. However, some practitioners report interocular differences when measuring fusion amplitudes depending on which eye is prismed, while others do not.
The hypothesis put forward is that, in individuals with an interocular difference in fusional vergence, ocular dominance (sensory and motor) could be the cause of this measurement discrepancy.
The objective is therefore to compare the difference in fusional vergence depending on whether the dominant or non-dominant eye is tested, using a randomized order of eyes and tests.
If this hypothesis is confirmed (greater fusional vergence when tested on the dominant eye), this would: (1) enhance our understanding of fusion mechanisms, (2) provide more targeted insights for the assessment, quantification, and rehabilitation of fusional vergence to improve the effectiveness of orthoptic intervention.
The study consists of one-hour eye examinations of healthy individuals with no visual or oculomotor disorders.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Maxence Rateaux, PhD
- Número de telefone: +33 01 44 49 53 62
- E-mail: maxence.rateaux@aphp.fr
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Hélène Morel
- Número de telefone: +33 01 44 38 16 53
- E-mail: helene.morel@aphp.fr
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Paris, França, 75015
- Recrutamento
- Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
-
Contato:
- Maxence Rateaux, PhD
- Número de telefone: +33 01 44 49 53 62
- E-mail: maxence.rateaux@aphp.fr
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults between the ages of 18 and 35 with no known eye conditions, with or without ametropia. If ametropia is present: it must be corrected
- Subjects with no history of eye surgery, including refractive surgery
- Subjects who have been informed about the study and have freely and knowingly consented to participate in the study and to the collection of data
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with strabismus
- Subjects with visual acuity of less than 20/20; or anisometropia
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Healthy individual
Individuals with no visual or oculomotor disorders.
|
Measurement of sensorimotor fusional vergence in the right and left eyes, in divergence and convergence, first for distance vision and then for near vision.
A random draw will determine which eye is tested first for distance vision, followed by a second draw for near vision, in order to minimize training bias.
Prior to this, a stereoscopic acuity test will be performed to confirm the presence of binocular vision.
Outros nomes:
Assessment of ocular dominance for:
Outros nomes:
Conducting an orthoptic evaluation to verify that patients meet the study's inclusion criteria:
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Amplitude of fusional vergence
Prazo: Day 0
|
Values of horizontal fusional vergence measured using a horizontal Berens prism bar in divergence and convergence, for distance and near vision, in the right eye and the left eye and reported in prism diopters.
|
Day 0
|
|
Laterality ocular dominance
Prazo: Day 0
|
Assessment of ocular dominance for:
|
Day 0
|
|
Lateralization quotient value (LQ)
Prazo: Day 0
|
Determination of the lateralization quotient value by the mean of previous responses of the ocular dominance tests.
|
Day 0
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of the degree of agreement among the various tests for ocular dominance
Prazo: Day 0
|
Compilation of responses to ocular dominance tests (sensorial and motor dominant eye, target eye and preferred eye) and lateralization quotient.
|
Day 0
|
|
Agreeement between the bilateral prismatic test (new test for oculomotor dominance laterality determination and standard ocular dominance tests
Prazo: Day 0
|
Evaluation of a new test (bilateral prismatic test for oculomotor dominance) and comparison to usually ocular dominance test.
All tests classify the ocular dominance into 3 categories : Left, Right, None.
This part tends to evaluation the efficacity and the utility of a new test for ocular dominance.
|
Day 0
|
|
Assessment of the difference in fusional vergence measurements between the right and left eyes and the laterality quotient
Prazo: Day 0
|
Assessment of the difference in fusional vergence measurements between the right and left eyes and the laterality quotient.
|
Day 0
|
|
Correlation between inter-pupillary distance measurements and differences in fusion amplitude measurements between the right and left eyes
Prazo: Day 0
|
Measurements of interpupillary distance and overall fusion ability, for distance vision and near vision.
|
Day 0
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Maxence Rateaux, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Diretor de estudo: Dominique MD, PhD BREMOND-GIGNAC, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Lopes-Ferreira D, Neves H, Queiros A, Faria-Ribeiro M, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Ocular dominance and visual function testing. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:238943. doi: 10.1155/2013/238943. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
- Rovira-Gay C, Mestre C, Argiles M, Vinuela-Navarro V, Pujol J. Feasibility of measuring fusional vergence amplitudes objectively. PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0284552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284552. eCollection 2023.
- Rowe FJ. Fusional vergence measures and their significance in clinical assessment. Strabismus. 2010 Jun;18(2):48-57. doi: 10.3109/09273971003758412.
- Bossi M, Hamm LM, Dahlmann-Noor A, Dakin SC. A comparison of tests for quantifying sensory eye dominance. Vision Res. 2018 Dec;153:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
- Lanca CC, Rowe FJ. Measurement of fusional vergence: a systematic review. Strabismus. 2019 Jun;27(2):88-113. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2019.1583675. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
- Fray KJ. Fusional amplitudes: exploring where fusion falters. Am Orthopt J. 2013;63:41-54. doi: 10.3368/aoj.63.1.41.
- Fray KJ. Fusional Amplitudes: Developing Testing Standards. Strabismus. 2017 Sep;25(3):145-155. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2017.1349814. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
- Ho R, Thompson B, Babu RJ, Dalton K. Sighting ocular dominance magnitude varies with test distance. Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Mar;101(2):276-280. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12627. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
- Kommerell G, Schmitt C, Kromeier M, Bach M. Ocular prevalence versus ocular dominance. Vision Res. 2003 Jun;43(12):1397-403. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00121-4.
- Garcia-Perez MA, Peli E. Psychophysical Tests Do Not Identify Ocular Dominance Consistently. Iperception. 2019 Apr 29;10(2):2041669519841397. doi: 10.1177/2041669519841397. eCollection 2019 Mar-Apr.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- APHP251987
- 2025-A02953-46 (Outro identificador: ID RCB number)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .