此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Comparison of Manual PAOP and Automatic PAOP (Smart Wedge) (SMART-PAPO)

2026年7月16日 更新者：Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Comparison of Pulmonary Artery Occlusion Pressure (PAOP) Measurements Performed by an Expert Versus Those Obtained Using the SmartWedge Algorithm in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (Swan-Ganz IQ™).

The pulmonary artery catheter (Swan-Ganz) is a standard tool in intensive care for measuring and monitoring the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). The Swan-Ganz IQ™ model also allows automatic measurement to reduce the risk of error (Smart Wedge). However, the concordance between this automatic method and the manual method remains poorly studied in real clinical conditions and may vary depending on certain clinical situations. This study therefore aims to compare the PAOP automatically measured (Smart Wedge) with the manual PAOP measurement at bedside based on data collected in clinical practice.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

The pulmonary artery catheter (or Swan-Ganz catheter) is a standard tool for measuring and monitoring PAOP in intensive care. It measures PAOP manually, which is considered the gold standard method. The Swan-Ganz IQ™ model also offers automatic measurement of PAOP during inflation of the balloon in the pulmonary artery (Smart Wedge). The ability to automatically measure PAOP would decrease the risk of error. However, the concordance between manual PAOP (reference method) and automatic PAOP (Smart Wedge) remains poorly evaluated by independent data in real clinical conditions. Furthermore, this agreement may vary depending on the clinical situation. In this context, this study aims to compare the manual PAOP measurement and the automatic PAOP measurement (Smart Wedge) based on data collected in the clinical setting.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

30

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Patients hospitalized in medical ICU (of Bicêtre and Angers) with pulmonary arterial catheter (PAC) place as part of routine clinical care.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years;
  • Admission to an intensive care unit;
  • Presence of a Swan-Ganz IQ™ pulmonary artery catheter placed as part of patient care;
  • Measurement of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) performed by the attending clinician as part of patient care.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy;
  • Court-ordered protective measures.
  • Refusal to participate by the patient's family members or the patient themselves.
  • Cardiac output measurements by thermodilution or by continuous cardiac output analysis that cannot be interpreted.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Assess the agreement between PAOP values measured by the "Smart Wedge" algorithm and PAOP values analyzed by an expert in patients in shock who are being monitored via a pulmonary artery catheter (Swan Ganz IQ)
大体时间：1 day
The concordance between manual PAOP and automatic PAOP (assessed by the SmartWedge algorithm during the inflation of the ballon in the arterial pulmonary).
1 day

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Identify situations where there is a risk of discrepancy in the "Smart Wedge" value
大体时间：1 day
Identify situations where there is a risk of discrepancy in the "Smart Wedge" value: mechanical ventilation vs. spontaneous ventilation, high auto-PEEP, mitral regurgitation, arrhythmia.
1 day
Assess the variability between PAOP values measured by the Smart Wedge algorithm and those measured by an expert.
大体时间：1 day
Describe the variation and the relationship between the PAOP values measured by the "Smart Wedge" algorithm and those determined by expert interpretation.
1 day
Assess the agreement between the PAPO value provided by the "Smart Wedge" algorithm and the PAPO value used in clinical practice, and compare it to the agreement observed between the algorithm and the expert interpretation performed retrospectively.
大体时间：1 day
Evaluate the agreement between the PAPO value provided by the "Smart Wedge" algorithm and the PAPO value used in clinical practice at the patient's bedside (as recorded in the medical record by the attending clinician), and compare this agreement to that observed between the algorithm and the expert reading performed retrospectively.
1 day

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

调查人员

  • 研究主任：Xavier MONNET、Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年7月10日

初级完成 (估计的)

2028年7月10日

研究完成 (估计的)

2028年7月10日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月8日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月8日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月14日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月17日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月16日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • SMART-PAPO

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅