此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Dental Anesthesia

2026年7月24日 更新者:Jose Leonardo Jimenez-Ortiz、University of Montemorelos

Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Dental Anesthesia: A Pilot Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare two methods of delivering local dental anesthesia in undergraduate dental students: a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system and a conventional dental syringe. The study evaluated whether the computer-controlled system reduced pain during the administration of local anesthesia compared with the conventional technique.

The main questions this study aimed to answer were:

Does a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system reduce pain during maxillary buccal infiltration compared with a conventional dental syringe? Are there differences in physiological responses (blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation) between the two anesthetic delivery methods? Which anesthetic delivery method do participants prefer after experiencing both techniques? Would participants recommend their preferred anesthetic delivery method to others? Participants attended two study visits approximately one week apart. Each participant received local anesthesia using both delivery methods in a randomized order, serving as his or her own control. Pain, dental anxiety, physiological parameters, anesthetic delivery preferences, and willingness to recommend the preferred method were assessed during the study.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

29

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Nuevo León
      • Montemorelos、Nuevo León、墨西哥、67530
        • University Dental Clinic, Montemorelos University School of Dentistry

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergraduate dental student enrolled in the Local Anesthesia course at the Montemorelos University School of Dentistry.
  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Willing to attend both study periods.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Known allergy or contraindication to lidocaine or epinephrine.
  • Systemic conditions contraindicating elective dental treatment.
  • Use of medications that could alter cardiovascular responses.
  • Medical condition that could interfere with pain perception or study participation.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:基础科学
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:交叉作业
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Delivery
Participants received maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system during one of two study periods according to the randomized treatment sequence. Each participant received both study interventions and served as his or her own control.
Local anesthetic was administered using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system with 2% lidocaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine through a 27-gauge short dental needle for maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia. The device controlled the flow rate throughout anesthetic administration according to the manufacturer's operating protocol.
其他名称:
  • SOGA-MINI
有源比较器:Conventional Dental Syringe
Participants received maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia using a conventional aspirating dental syringe during one of two study periods according to the randomized treatment sequence. Each participant received both study interventions and served as his or her own control.
Local anesthetic was administered using a conventional aspirating dental syringe with 2% lidocaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine through a 27-gauge short dental needle for maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia. Anesthetic administration followed the conventional manual injection technique.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Pain perception during local anesthetic administration
大体时间:Immediately after each anesthetic administration
Pain perceived during maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system or a conventional aspirating dental syringe. Pain was assessed immediately after each intervention using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicated "no pain" and 10 indicated "worst imaginable pain".
Immediately after each anesthetic administration

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Dental anxiety
大体时间:Baseline (before the first study intervention)
Dental anxiety was assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS; score range: 5-25). Higher scores indicate greater dental anxiety. Assessment was performed before the first study intervention.
Baseline (before the first study intervention)
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
大体时间:Before, during, and immediately after each anesthetic administration
Blood pressure was measured using an automated monitor before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
Before, during, and immediately after each anesthetic administration
Heart rate
大体时间:Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
Heart rate was measured using a pulse oximeter before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂)
大体时间:Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
Peripheral oxygen saturation was measured using a pulse oximeter before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
Participant-reported preferred anesthetic delivery method
大体时间:Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
Participants selected their preferred anesthetic delivery method (computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system or conventional aspirating dental syringe) after experiencing both interventions.
Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
Willingness to recommend the preferred anesthetic delivery method
大体时间:Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
Willingness to recommend the preferred anesthetic delivery method was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10), where 0 indicated "not at all willing to recommend" and 10 indicated "extremely willing to recommend." Higher scores indicate greater willingness to recommend. Assessment was performed after completion of the second study intervention.
Immediately after completion of the second study intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Jose L Jimenez-Ortiz, DDS、Montemorelos University School of Dentistry

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年9月2日

初级完成 (实际的)

2025年12月2日

研究完成 (实际的)

2025年12月2日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月20日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月24日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月28日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月28日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月24日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

IPD 计划说明

A final decision regarding the sharing of de-identified individual participant data has not yet been made. Data sharing will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, participant confidentiality requirements, and applicable ethical and regulatory standards.

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅