Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Dental Anesthesia
24 luglio 2026 aggiornato da: Jose Leonardo Jimenez-Ortiz, University of Montemorelos
Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Dental Anesthesia: A Pilot Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare two methods of delivering local dental anesthesia in undergraduate dental students: a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system and a conventional dental syringe. The study evaluated whether the computer-controlled system reduced pain during the administration of local anesthesia compared with the conventional technique.
The main questions this study aimed to answer were:
Does a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system reduce pain during maxillary buccal infiltration compared with a conventional dental syringe? Are there differences in physiological responses (blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation) between the two anesthetic delivery methods? Which anesthetic delivery method do participants prefer after experiencing both techniques? Would participants recommend their preferred anesthetic delivery method to others? Participants attended two study visits approximately one week apart. Each participant received local anesthesia using both delivery methods in a randomized order, serving as his or her own control. Pain, dental anxiety, physiological parameters, anesthetic delivery preferences, and willingness to recommend the preferred method were assessed during the study.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Tipo di studio
Interventistico
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
29
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Nuevo León
-
Montemorelos, Nuevo León, Messico, 67530
- University Dental Clinic, Montemorelos University School of Dentistry
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Adulto
- Adulto più anziano
Accetta volontari sani
Sì
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Undergraduate dental student enrolled in the Local Anesthesia course at the Montemorelos University School of Dentistry.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
- Willing to attend both study periods.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Known allergy or contraindication to lidocaine or epinephrine.
- Systemic conditions contraindicating elective dental treatment.
- Use of medications that could alter cardiovascular responses.
- Medical condition that could interfere with pain perception or study participation.
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Scienza basilare
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione incrociata
- Mascheramento: Separare
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Delivery
Participants received maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system during one of two study periods according to the randomized treatment sequence.
Each participant received both study interventions and served as his or her own control.
|
Local anesthetic was administered using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system with 2% lidocaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine through a 27-gauge short dental needle for maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia.
The device controlled the flow rate throughout anesthetic administration according to the manufacturer's operating protocol.
Altri nomi:
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Conventional Dental Syringe
Participants received maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia using a conventional aspirating dental syringe during one of two study periods according to the randomized treatment sequence.
Each participant received both study interventions and served as his or her own control.
|
Local anesthetic was administered using a conventional aspirating dental syringe with 2% lidocaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine through a 27-gauge short dental needle for maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia.
Anesthetic administration followed the conventional manual injection technique.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain perception during local anesthetic administration
Lasso di tempo: Immediately after each anesthetic administration
|
Pain perceived during maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system or a conventional aspirating dental syringe.
Pain was assessed immediately after each intervention using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicated "no pain" and 10 indicated "worst imaginable pain".
|
Immediately after each anesthetic administration
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Dental anxiety
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (before the first study intervention)
|
Dental anxiety was assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS; score range: 5-25).
Higher scores indicate greater dental anxiety.
Assessment was performed before the first study intervention.
|
Baseline (before the first study intervention)
|
|
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Lasso di tempo: Before, during, and immediately after each anesthetic administration
|
Blood pressure was measured using an automated monitor before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
|
Before, during, and immediately after each anesthetic administration
|
|
Heart rate
Lasso di tempo: Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
|
Heart rate was measured using a pulse oximeter before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
|
Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
|
|
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂)
Lasso di tempo: Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
|
Peripheral oxygen saturation was measured using a pulse oximeter before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
|
Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
|
|
Participant-reported preferred anesthetic delivery method
Lasso di tempo: Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
|
Participants selected their preferred anesthetic delivery method (computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system or conventional aspirating dental syringe) after experiencing both interventions.
|
Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
|
|
Willingness to recommend the preferred anesthetic delivery method
Lasso di tempo: Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
|
Willingness to recommend the preferred anesthetic delivery method was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10), where 0 indicated "not at all willing to recommend" and 10 indicated "extremely willing to recommend."
Higher scores indicate greater willingness to recommend.
Assessment was performed after completion of the second study intervention.
|
Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Sponsor
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Jose L Jimenez-Ortiz, DDS, Montemorelos University School of Dentistry
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
2 settembre 2025
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
2 dicembre 2025
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
2 dicembre 2025
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
20 luglio 2026
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
24 luglio 2026
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
28 luglio 2026
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
28 luglio 2026
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
24 luglio 2026
Ultimo verificato
1 luglio 2026
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- UM-ESEST-2025-015
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
INDECISO
Descrizione del piano IPD
A final decision regarding the sharing of de-identified individual participant data has not yet been made.
Data sharing will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, participant confidentiality requirements, and applicable ethical and regulatory standards.
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .