Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Dental Anesthesia

24. juli 2026 opdateret af: Jose Leonardo Jimenez-Ortiz, University of Montemorelos

Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Dental Anesthesia: A Pilot Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare two methods of delivering local dental anesthesia in undergraduate dental students: a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system and a conventional dental syringe. The study evaluated whether the computer-controlled system reduced pain during the administration of local anesthesia compared with the conventional technique.

The main questions this study aimed to answer were:

Does a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system reduce pain during maxillary buccal infiltration compared with a conventional dental syringe? Are there differences in physiological responses (blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation) between the two anesthetic delivery methods? Which anesthetic delivery method do participants prefer after experiencing both techniques? Would participants recommend their preferred anesthetic delivery method to others? Participants attended two study visits approximately one week apart. Each participant received local anesthesia using both delivery methods in a randomized order, serving as his or her own control. Pain, dental anxiety, physiological parameters, anesthetic delivery preferences, and willingness to recommend the preferred method were assessed during the study.

Studieoversigt

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

29

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Nuevo León
      • Montemorelos, Nuevo León, Mexico, 67530
        • University Dental Clinic, Montemorelos University School of Dentistry

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergraduate dental student enrolled in the Local Anesthesia course at the Montemorelos University School of Dentistry.
  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Willing to attend both study periods.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Known allergy or contraindication to lidocaine or epinephrine.
  • Systemic conditions contraindicating elective dental treatment.
  • Use of medications that could alter cardiovascular responses.
  • Medical condition that could interfere with pain perception or study participation.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Grundvidenskab
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Crossover opgave
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Delivery
Participants received maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system during one of two study periods according to the randomized treatment sequence. Each participant received both study interventions and served as his or her own control.
Local anesthetic was administered using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system with 2% lidocaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine through a 27-gauge short dental needle for maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia. The device controlled the flow rate throughout anesthetic administration according to the manufacturer's operating protocol.
Andre navne:
  • SOGA-MINI
Aktiv komparator: Conventional Dental Syringe
Participants received maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia using a conventional aspirating dental syringe during one of two study periods according to the randomized treatment sequence. Each participant received both study interventions and served as his or her own control.
Local anesthetic was administered using a conventional aspirating dental syringe with 2% lidocaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine through a 27-gauge short dental needle for maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia. Anesthetic administration followed the conventional manual injection technique.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain perception during local anesthetic administration
Tidsramme: Immediately after each anesthetic administration
Pain perceived during maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system or a conventional aspirating dental syringe. Pain was assessed immediately after each intervention using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicated "no pain" and 10 indicated "worst imaginable pain".
Immediately after each anesthetic administration

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Dental anxiety
Tidsramme: Baseline (before the first study intervention)
Dental anxiety was assessed using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS; score range: 5-25). Higher scores indicate greater dental anxiety. Assessment was performed before the first study intervention.
Baseline (before the first study intervention)
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Tidsramme: Before, during, and immediately after each anesthetic administration
Blood pressure was measured using an automated monitor before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
Before, during, and immediately after each anesthetic administration
Heart rate
Tidsramme: Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
Heart rate was measured using a pulse oximeter before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂)
Tidsramme: Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
Peripheral oxygen saturation was measured using a pulse oximeter before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration.
Before, during, and immediately after anesthetic administration
Participant-reported preferred anesthetic delivery method
Tidsramme: Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
Participants selected their preferred anesthetic delivery method (computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system or conventional aspirating dental syringe) after experiencing both interventions.
Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
Willingness to recommend the preferred anesthetic delivery method
Tidsramme: Immediately after completion of the second study intervention
Willingness to recommend the preferred anesthetic delivery method was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10), where 0 indicated "not at all willing to recommend" and 10 indicated "extremely willing to recommend." Higher scores indicate greater willingness to recommend. Assessment was performed after completion of the second study intervention.
Immediately after completion of the second study intervention

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Jose L Jimenez-Ortiz, DDS, Montemorelos University School of Dentistry

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

2. september 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

2. december 2025

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

2. december 2025

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

20. juli 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

24. juli 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

28. juli 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

28. juli 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

24. juli 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juli 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

UBESLUTET

IPD-planbeskrivelse

A final decision regarding the sharing of de-identified individual participant data has not yet been made. Data sharing will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, participant confidentiality requirements, and applicable ethical and regulatory standards.

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner