Using 360-Degree Interactive Video for Bleeding First Aid in Nursing Education: Effects on Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Learning Experience
2026年8月19日 更新者：Aydan Baysan、Manisa Celal Bayar University
360 Derece Etkileşimli Video Teknolojisinin Hemşirelik Eğitiminde Kullanımı: Bir Karma Yöntem Araştırması
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a 360-degree interactive virtual reality (VR) video simulation works to improve first aid knowledge, knowledge retention, and self-efficacy in stopping severe bleeding among first-year undergraduate nursing students. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Does experiencing the interactive VR video simulation increase students' knowledge of bleeding first aid?
- Does the VR video simulation increase students' long-term retention of first aid knowledge?
- Does the VR video simulation improve students' self-efficacy in bleeding first aid? Researchers compared four groups using a Solomon four-group design to evaluate the effectiveness of the VR simulation, while also testing whether taking a pre-test affected the final outcomes.
Participants:
- Completed an introductory survey and possibly a baseline test measuring first aid knowledge and self-efficacy.
- Attended a 1-hour standard classroom lecture about first aid for bleeding.
- (Intervention groups only) Completed a 5-minute interactive 360-degree video simulation of a severe bleeding emergency using an Oculus Quest 2 VR headset, which required answering 7 clinical decision-making questions.
- Completed follow-up tests 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the training to measure their bleeding first aid knowledge and self-efficacy.
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
152
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
-
Izmir、土耳其（türkiye）
- Ege University Faculty of Nursing
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
是的
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being a volunteer participant
- Being a first-year nursing student enrolled at Ege University Faculty of Nursing during the 2021-2022 academic year.
- Having successfully completed the "First Aid Module" (First Aid Course) within the current curriculum
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having any pre-existing health or visual conditions that prevent the safe use of virtual reality (VR) equipment (such as active epilepsy, severe uncorrected visual impairment, or pre-existing psychiatric disorders).
- Requesting to withdraw from the study or refusing to participate at any stage of the research
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Intervention Group 1 (Pre-tested)
Receives the pre-test, standard classroom instruction (lecture), the 360-degree VR video simulation, the post-test, and the retention test
|
A 5-minute interactive 360-degree video simulation of a severe bleeding emergency using an Oculus Quest 2 VR headset, which requires answering 7 clinical decision-making questions
|
|
实验性的：Intervention Group 2 (Unpre-tested)
Receives standard classroom instruction, the 360-degree VR video simulation, the post-test, and the retention test
|
A 5-minute interactive 360-degree video simulation of a severe bleeding emergency using an Oculus Quest 2 VR headset, which requires answering 7 clinical decision-making questions
|
|
无干预：Control Group 1 (Pre-tested)
Receives the pre-test, standard classroom instruction, the post-test, and the retention test
|
|
|
无干预：Control Group 2 (Unpre-tested)
Receives standard classroom instruction, the post-test, and the retention test
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Bleeding First Aid Knowledge
大体时间：Baseline (Pre-test), 4 weeks post-intervention (Post-test), and 8 weeks post-intervention (Retention test)
|
Assessed using the "First Aid for Bleeding Knowledge Test" developed and validated by the researchers.
This is a 20-item multiple-choice test designed to measure cognitive learning.
Correct answers are scored as 1 and incorrect answers as 0. The total score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of bleeding first aid knowledge.
|
Baseline (Pre-test), 4 weeks post-intervention (Post-test), and 8 weeks post-intervention (Retention test)
|
|
Bleeding First Aid Self-Efficacy
大体时间：Baseline (Pre-test) and 4 weeks post-intervention (Post-test)
|
Assessed using the "First Aid for Bleeding Self-Efficacy Scale" developed and validated by the researchers.
This is a 19-item, five-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 1=completely insufficient to 5=completely sufficient) that measures students' perceived competence in managing bleeding situations.
The total score ranges from 19 to 95, with higher scores reflecting greater clinical self-efficacy.
|
Baseline (Pre-test) and 4 weeks post-intervention (Post-test)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Perception of Simulation Design
大体时间：Immediately after the virtual reality simulation session
|
Assessed using the 20-item Simulation Design Scale (adapted into Turkish by Unver et al., 2017) only for the intervention groups.
The scale evaluates five key elements of simulation design: objectives/information, student support, problem-solving, guided reflection/feedback, and fidelity.
Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree).
The overall score ranges from 20 to 100, where higher scores reflect a stronger presence of effective simulation design components.
|
Immediately after the virtual reality simulation session
|
|
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning
大体时间：Immediately after the virtual reality simulation session
|
Assessed using the 12-item Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (adapted into Turkish by Unver et al., 2017).
It includes two subscales: satisfaction with current learning (5 items) and self-confidence in learning (7 items).
Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree).
The total score ranges from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater learning satisfaction and self-confidence.
|
Immediately after the virtual reality simulation session
|
|
Video Engagement and Immersion
大体时间：Immediately after the virtual reality simulation session
|
Assessed using the 15-item Video Engagement Scale (adapted into Turkish by Deryakulu et al., 2019) to measure the student's emotional and cognitive immersion.
It consists of five subscales (attention, going into a narrative world, identity, empathy, and emotion) rated on a seven-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree).
The total score ranges from 15 to 105, with higher scores indicating stronger engagement with the VR environment.
|
Immediately after the virtual reality simulation session
|
|
Occurrence of Cybersickness / Simulation Side Effects
大体时间：During and up to 15 minutes immediately following the virtual reality experience
|
Assessed using a structured Researcher Observation Form to track any simulator-related physical discomfort (such as dizziness, nausea, headache, or neck pain) experienced by participants during or immediately after the VR headset experience.
Side effects are recorded categorically as present/absent and graded by severity (none, mild, moderate).
|
During and up to 15 minutes immediately following the virtual reality experience
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2022年5月10日
初级完成 (实际的)
2022年8月2日
研究完成 (实际的)
2022年8月2日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年8月16日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年8月16日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年8月19日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年8月21日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年8月19日
最后验证
2026年8月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- EGE-2021-11/04-1081
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
未定
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.