此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

A Decision Support Tool for Pancreatic Cancer Screening -Aim 2

2026年9月1日 更新者：UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Pancreatic cancer has a rising incidence and poor survival. Early detection in high-risk individuals may substantially improve outcomes. Although guidelines recommend screening for individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes or certain genetic variants, pancreatic cancer screening remains uncertain due to limited evidence of mortality benefit, unclear screening strategies, potential harms, resource requirements, and low adherence. Shared decision-making between patients and providers is therefore essential, but no decision aid currently exists to support pancreatic cancer screening decisions. This record covers Aim 2, which will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation of an electronic decision support tool designed to improve shared decision-making, value-concordant care, and screening adherence. The pilot study will also provide training in clinical trial methodology and support development toward an independent research career.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

40

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

  • 美国
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill、North Carolina、美国、27599
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
        • 接触：
          • Trevor Barlowe, MD
        • 首席研究员：
          • Trevor Barlowe, MD

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who are eligible for pancreatic cancer screening according to current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
  • Not currently enrolled in a pancreatic cancer screening program.
  • Referred to or previously seen at the UNC High Risk GI Cancer Clinic.
  • English-speaking.
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently enrolled in a pancreatic cancer screening program.
  • Does not meet pancreatic cancer screening eligibility criteria according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
  • Non-English speaking.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：预防
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：无（打开标签）

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：Electronic Decision Support Tool
Patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening will use an electronic decision support tool during clinical care to support shared decision-making regarding pancreatic cancer screening.
行为的：Electronic Decision Support Tool
Participants will use an electronic decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision-making about pancreatic cancer screening. The pilot study will evaluate the tool's acceptability, feasibility, and implementation in clinical practice.
无干预：Standard of Care
Patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening will receive usual clinical care without use of the electronic decision support tool.

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Acceptability of the decision support tool
大体时间：Up to 3 months
Participant-reported acceptability of the electronic decision support tool, assessed using a validated acceptability measures: acceptability of intervention measure (AIM) and intervention appropriateness measure (IAM). The minimum score for both measures is 4 (all items rated "1 - Completely Disagree") and the maximum score is 20 (all items rated "5 - Completely Agree").
Up to 3 months
Feasibility, Barriers, and Facilitators of Implementing the Decision Support Tool - Recruitment Rate
大体时间：Up to 3 months
Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion and number of eligible participants who enroll in the study, will be used to assess the feasibility of integrating and implementing the electronic decision support tool in clinical practice.
Up to 3 months
Feasibility, barriers, and facilitators of implementing the decision support tool - retention rate
大体时间：Up to 3 months
Retention rate, defined as the number and proportion of enrolled participants who complete use of the electronic decision support tool and all study-related assessments, will be used to assess the feasibility of integrating and implementing the tool in clinical practice.
Up to 3 months

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in score on 5 question knowledge assessment
大体时间：Up to 3 months
Difference between participants' post-visit and pre-visit knowledge scores regarding the screening decision. Change in knowledge will be defined as the difference between participants' post-visit and pre-visit knowledge scores on a five-item knowledge assessment, calculated as the post-knowledge score minus the pre-knowledge score. Pre- and post-knowledge scores will be calculated by summing correct answers (equal to 1) and incorrect or incomplete responses (equal to 0). The assessment will be administered immediately before and after the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months
Rate of Decision-Concordant Care
大体时间：Up to 3 months
If the participant undergoes the screening test documented during the clinic visit within 3 months of the visit, this will be considered decision-concordant care. The rate of decision concordant care will be equal to the number of participants who underwent decision-concordant care divided by the total number of participants in the study. Medical record/chart review will be used for measurements
Up to 3 months
Duration of the clinic visit
大体时间：Up to 3 months
Duration of the clinic visit will be measured as the duration of the index clinic visit using available clinical or electronic medical record timestamps. This measure will be used to evaluate whether the intervention affects the amount of time required to complete the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months
Patient-reported assessment of shared decision-making quality -1
大体时间：Up to 3 months
Patient-reported assessment of the quality of the shared decision-making process, including the extent to which patients received information about available options, understood the benefits and risks of those options, and had their preferences considered in the decision. It will be measured using the collaboRATE questionnaire, administered immediately following the clinic visit and using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The SDM-Q-9 measures the extent to which patients perceive that key components of shared decision-making occurred during the clinical encounter. The minimum score for the SDM-Q-9 is 0 (all items rated "0 - Completely Disagree") and the maximum score is 45 (all items rated "5 - Completely Agree"). Higher scores indicate a patient perception of better shared decision making. It will be administered immediately following the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months
Patient-reported assessment of shared decision-making quality -2
大体时间：Up to 3 months
Patient-reported perception of the extent to which shared decision-making occurred during the clinic visit will be additionally be assessed using the 3 question collaboRATE questionnaire. The collaboRATE questionnaire measures the extent to which patients received information about available options, understood the benefits and risks of those options, and had their preferences considered. The minimum score for collaborate is 0 (all items rated "0 - No Effort") and the maximum score is 12 (all items rated "4 - Every Effort"). T the collaboRATE questionnaire will be administered immediately following the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months
Patient-reported assessment of decisional conflict
大体时间：Up to 3 months
Patient-reported uncertainty or conflict regarding the screening decision, including factors such as informed choice, will be assessed using the 16 question decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The minimum score for the DCS is 0 (no decisional conflict) and the maximum score is 100 (extremely high decisional conflict). The DCS will be administered immediately following the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

合作者

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Trevor Barlowe, MD、UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年9月8日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年9月8日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年9月8日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年8月25日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年9月1日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年9月9日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月9日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月1日

最后验证

2026年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • 25-3036AIM2
  • K12TR004416 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

是的

IPD 计划说明

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying published results will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, beginning one year after publication.

IPD 共享时间框架

One year after publication

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅