Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

A Decision Support Tool for Pancreatic Cancer Screening -Aim 2

1. september 2026 oppdatert av: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Pancreatic cancer has a rising incidence and poor survival. Early detection in high-risk individuals may substantially improve outcomes. Although guidelines recommend screening for individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes or certain genetic variants, pancreatic cancer screening remains uncertain due to limited evidence of mortality benefit, unclear screening strategies, potential harms, resource requirements, and low adherence. Shared decision-making between patients and providers is therefore essential, but no decision aid currently exists to support pancreatic cancer screening decisions. This record covers Aim 2, which will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation of an electronic decision support tool designed to improve shared decision-making, value-concordant care, and screening adherence. The pilot study will also provide training in clinical trial methodology and support development toward an independent research career.

Studieoversikt

Status

Har ikke rekruttert ennå

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

40

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studiesteder

  • Forente stater
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Forente stater, 27599
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
        • Ta kontakt med:
          • Trevor Barlowe, MD
        • Hovedetterforsker:
          • Trevor Barlowe, MD

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who are eligible for pancreatic cancer screening according to current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
  • Not currently enrolled in a pancreatic cancer screening program.
  • Referred to or previously seen at the UNC High Risk GI Cancer Clinic.
  • English-speaking.
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently enrolled in a pancreatic cancer screening program.
  • Does not meet pancreatic cancer screening eligibility criteria according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
  • Non-English speaking.

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebygging
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Electronic Decision Support Tool
Patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening will use an electronic decision support tool during clinical care to support shared decision-making regarding pancreatic cancer screening.
Atferdsmessig: Electronic Decision Support Tool
Participants will use an electronic decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision-making about pancreatic cancer screening. The pilot study will evaluate the tool's acceptability, feasibility, and implementation in clinical practice.
Ingen inngripen: Standard of Care
Patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening will receive usual clinical care without use of the electronic decision support tool.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Acceptability of the decision support tool
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
Participant-reported acceptability of the electronic decision support tool, assessed using a validated acceptability measures: acceptability of intervention measure (AIM) and intervention appropriateness measure (IAM). The minimum score for both measures is 4 (all items rated "1 - Completely Disagree") and the maximum score is 20 (all items rated "5 - Completely Agree").
Up to 3 months
Feasibility, Barriers, and Facilitators of Implementing the Decision Support Tool - Recruitment Rate
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion and number of eligible participants who enroll in the study, will be used to assess the feasibility of integrating and implementing the electronic decision support tool in clinical practice.
Up to 3 months
Feasibility, barriers, and facilitators of implementing the decision support tool - retention rate
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
Retention rate, defined as the number and proportion of enrolled participants who complete use of the electronic decision support tool and all study-related assessments, will be used to assess the feasibility of integrating and implementing the tool in clinical practice.
Up to 3 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in score on 5 question knowledge assessment
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
Difference between participants' post-visit and pre-visit knowledge scores regarding the screening decision. Change in knowledge will be defined as the difference between participants' post-visit and pre-visit knowledge scores on a five-item knowledge assessment, calculated as the post-knowledge score minus the pre-knowledge score. Pre- and post-knowledge scores will be calculated by summing correct answers (equal to 1) and incorrect or incomplete responses (equal to 0). The assessment will be administered immediately before and after the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months
Rate of Decision-Concordant Care
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
If the participant undergoes the screening test documented during the clinic visit within 3 months of the visit, this will be considered decision-concordant care. The rate of decision concordant care will be equal to the number of participants who underwent decision-concordant care divided by the total number of participants in the study. Medical record/chart review will be used for measurements
Up to 3 months
Duration of the clinic visit
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
Duration of the clinic visit will be measured as the duration of the index clinic visit using available clinical or electronic medical record timestamps. This measure will be used to evaluate whether the intervention affects the amount of time required to complete the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months
Patient-reported assessment of shared decision-making quality -1
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
Patient-reported assessment of the quality of the shared decision-making process, including the extent to which patients received information about available options, understood the benefits and risks of those options, and had their preferences considered in the decision. It will be measured using the collaboRATE questionnaire, administered immediately following the clinic visit and using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The SDM-Q-9 measures the extent to which patients perceive that key components of shared decision-making occurred during the clinical encounter. The minimum score for the SDM-Q-9 is 0 (all items rated "0 - Completely Disagree") and the maximum score is 45 (all items rated "5 - Completely Agree"). Higher scores indicate a patient perception of better shared decision making. It will be administered immediately following the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months
Patient-reported assessment of shared decision-making quality -2
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
Patient-reported perception of the extent to which shared decision-making occurred during the clinic visit will be additionally be assessed using the 3 question collaboRATE questionnaire. The collaboRATE questionnaire measures the extent to which patients received information about available options, understood the benefits and risks of those options, and had their preferences considered. The minimum score for collaborate is 0 (all items rated "0 - No Effort") and the maximum score is 12 (all items rated "4 - Every Effort"). T the collaboRATE questionnaire will be administered immediately following the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months
Patient-reported assessment of decisional conflict
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
Patient-reported uncertainty or conflict regarding the screening decision, including factors such as informed choice, will be assessed using the 16 question decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The minimum score for the DCS is 0 (no decisional conflict) and the maximum score is 100 (extremely high decisional conflict). The DCS will be administered immediately following the clinic visit.
Up to 3 months

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Samarbeidspartnere

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Trevor Barlowe, MD, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Hjelpsomme linker

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

8. september 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

8. september 2027

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

8. september 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

25. august 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

1. september 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

9. september 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

9. september 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

1. september 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. september 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • 25-3036AIM2
  • K12TR004416 (U.S. NIH-stipend/kontrakt)

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying published results will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, beginning one year after publication.

IPD-delingstidsramme

One year after publication

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere