Self-training and Resuscitation Techniques: Evaluation of the Performance and Impact on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) (ATIPIQ)
Evaluation of the Impact of the "Resuscitation Quality Improvement" (RQI) Simulation-based Self-training Program on the Level of Technical Skills Employed by Healthcare Professionals During the Management of Cardiac Arrest.
Cardiac arrest (CA) remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and its incidence continues to increase. The median survival rate following in-hospital cardiac arrest in France is 19%. In Europe, it ranges from 15% to 34%. Effective management of cardiac arrest is therefore essential to reduce the mortality rate associated with in-hospital cardiac arrest.
However, cardiac arrest is a source of stress in conventional care settings. First, it is a life-threatening emergency in which the absence of effective management results in the patient's death. Furthermore, the occurrence of cardiac arrest in conventional hospital wards, particularly in pediatrics, is uncommon. Healthcare professionals are therefore not accustomed to encountering these situations, which may lead to apprehension, stress, and a lack of confidence in their skills when faced with cardiac arrest.
In this context, maintaining skills is essential to ensure effective management of cardiac arrest.
Providing open-access training in the workplace would make it possible to maintain a high level of proficiency over time while allowing healthcare professionals to remain at their workplace.
The expected benefits are improved management of patients experiencing cardiac arrest through regular training and maintenance of the technical skills of paramedical and medical healthcare professionals in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of a pre-/post-training intervention on the level of technical skills used by healthcare professionals in the management of cardiac arrest.
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
Regular and ongoing training of healthcare professionals is essential to ensure effective management in the event of cardiac arrest.
Providing training within the care unit would increase the frequency of training sessions while reducing staff availability constraints, and could help maintain a high level of proficiency in CPR skills over time.
In 2015, Laerdal and the American Heart Association developed a resuscitation quality improvement program called RQI (Resuscitation Quality Improvement), enabling healthcare professionals to independently train in CPR techniques within their own department, with feedback on skills acquisition.
The RQI simulation-based self-training program is a self-directed learning system for basic CPR that complies with Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the international standard. Its objective is to improve CPR skills related to chest compressions and BVM ventilation, using auditory and visual feedback to support skills acquisition during simulated resuscitation.
The training method provides a certificate of successful completion every three months. However, learners may log in and train as often as they wish.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) simulation-based self-training program on the technical CPR skills used during cardiac arrest management among healthcare professionals working in three pediatric hospital departments at Trousseau Hospital (AP-HP, Paris).
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名:Léopoldine Legrain, nurse
- 电话号码:00 33 1 87 89 27 10
- 邮箱:leopoldine.legrain@aphp.fr
学习地点
-
-
-
Paris、法国、75012
- P₂ULSE
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
取样方法
研究人群
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Working in one of the 3 participating pediatric departments as a nursing assistant, nurse, physician, or healthcare manager
Exclusion Criteria:
- Objection to the collection of his data
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
the success rate (total score greater than or equal to 75%) of RQI program participants
大体时间:12 months
|
the success rate (total score greater than or equal to 75%) of RQI program participants in order to evaluate the impact of the RQI self-training program on CPR technical skills
|
12 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the number of logins to the station
大体时间:baseline and 12 months
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the number of logins to the station in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
|
baseline and 12 months
|
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the profession (Registered Nurse (RN), Nursing Assistant (NA), Physician)
大体时间:baseline and 12 months
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the profession (Registered Nurse (RN), Nursing Assistant (NA), Physician) in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
|
baseline and 12 months
|
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Professional experience (number of years)
大体时间:baseline and 12 months
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Professional experience (number of years) in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
|
baseline and 12 months
|
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Department/unit of practice in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills According to Profile
大体时间:baseline and 12 months
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Department/unit of practice in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to Profile
|
baseline and 12 months
|
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to occurrence of a cardiac arrest in the department in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills According to Profile
大体时间:baseline and 12 months
|
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to occurrence of a cardiac arrest in the department in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to Profile
|
baseline and 12 months
|
|
Evaluate learner satisfaction with the RQI training program using a satisfaction questionnaire
大体时间:12 months
|
Evaluate learner satisfaction with the RQI training program using a satisfaction questionnaire (score greater than or equal to 80%).
|
12 months
|
|
Number of technical malfunctions
大体时间:24 months
|
the number of technical malfunctions in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
|
24 months
|
|
Number of network problems
大体时间:24 months
|
the number of network problems in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
|
24 months
|
|
Number of system connection issues
大体时间:24 months
|
the number of system connection issues, in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
|
24 months
|
|
Number of simulator operation
大体时间:24 months
|
the number of simulator operation in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
|
24 months
|
|
Number of computer operation
大体时间:24 months
|
the number of computer operation in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
|
24 months
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Léopoldine Legrain, Nurse、Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- APHP260482
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.