Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Self-training and Resuscitation Techniques: Evaluation of the Performance and Impact on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) (ATIPIQ)

14 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Evaluation of the Impact of the "Resuscitation Quality Improvement" (RQI) Simulation-based Self-training Program on the Level of Technical Skills Employed by Healthcare Professionals During the Management of Cardiac Arrest.

Cardiac arrest (CA) remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and its incidence continues to increase. The median survival rate following in-hospital cardiac arrest in France is 19%. In Europe, it ranges from 15% to 34%. Effective management of cardiac arrest is therefore essential to reduce the mortality rate associated with in-hospital cardiac arrest.

However, cardiac arrest is a source of stress in conventional care settings. First, it is a life-threatening emergency in which the absence of effective management results in the patient's death. Furthermore, the occurrence of cardiac arrest in conventional hospital wards, particularly in pediatrics, is uncommon. Healthcare professionals are therefore not accustomed to encountering these situations, which may lead to apprehension, stress, and a lack of confidence in their skills when faced with cardiac arrest.

In this context, maintaining skills is essential to ensure effective management of cardiac arrest.

Providing open-access training in the workplace would make it possible to maintain a high level of proficiency over time while allowing healthcare professionals to remain at their workplace.

The expected benefits are improved management of patients experiencing cardiac arrest through regular training and maintenance of the technical skills of paramedical and medical healthcare professionals in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of a pre-/post-training intervention on the level of technical skills used by healthcare professionals in the management of cardiac arrest.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Regular and ongoing training of healthcare professionals is essential to ensure effective management in the event of cardiac arrest.

Providing training within the care unit would increase the frequency of training sessions while reducing staff availability constraints, and could help maintain a high level of proficiency in CPR skills over time.

In 2015, Laerdal and the American Heart Association developed a resuscitation quality improvement program called RQI (Resuscitation Quality Improvement), enabling healthcare professionals to independently train in CPR techniques within their own department, with feedback on skills acquisition.

The RQI simulation-based self-training program is a self-directed learning system for basic CPR that complies with Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the international standard. Its objective is to improve CPR skills related to chest compressions and BVM ventilation, using auditory and visual feedback to support skills acquisition during simulated resuscitation.

The training method provides a certificate of successful completion every three months. However, learners may log in and train as often as they wish.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) simulation-based self-training program on the technical CPR skills used during cardiac arrest management among healthcare professionals working in three pediatric hospital departments at Trousseau Hospital (AP-HP, Paris).

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

265

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

      • Paris, France, 75012
        • P₂ULSE

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

The study will include healthcare professionals working in one of the three departments of the A. Trousseau Children's Hospital: neonatal and pediatric intensive care, emergency department, and oncology/hematology.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Working in one of the 3 participating pediatric departments as a nursing assistant, nurse, physician, or healthcare manager

Exclusion Criteria:

- Objection to the collection of his data

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
the success rate (total score greater than or equal to 75%) of RQI program participants
Délai: 12 months
the success rate (total score greater than or equal to 75%) of RQI program participants in order to evaluate the impact of the RQI self-training program on CPR technical skills
12 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the number of logins to the station
Délai: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the number of logins to the station in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the profession (Registered Nurse (RN), Nursing Assistant (NA), Physician)
Délai: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the profession (Registered Nurse (RN), Nursing Assistant (NA), Physician) in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Professional experience (number of years)
Délai: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Professional experience (number of years) in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Department/unit of practice in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills According to Profile
Délai: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Department/unit of practice in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to Profile
baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to occurrence of a cardiac arrest in the department in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills According to Profile
Délai: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to occurrence of a cardiac arrest in the department in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to Profile
baseline and 12 months
Evaluate learner satisfaction with the RQI training program using a satisfaction questionnaire
Délai: 12 months
Evaluate learner satisfaction with the RQI training program using a satisfaction questionnaire (score greater than or equal to 80%).
12 months
Number of technical malfunctions
Délai: 24 months
the number of technical malfunctions in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months
Number of network problems
Délai: 24 months
the number of network problems in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months
Number of system connection issues
Délai: 24 months
the number of system connection issues, in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months
Number of simulator operation
Délai: 24 months
the number of simulator operation in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months
Number of computer operation
Délai: 24 months
the number of computer operation in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Léopoldine Legrain, Nurse, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 septembre 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

28 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

15 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

15 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • APHP260482

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner