Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Self-training and Resuscitation Techniques: Evaluation of the Performance and Impact on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) (ATIPIQ)

14 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Evaluation of the Impact of the "Resuscitation Quality Improvement" (RQI) Simulation-based Self-training Program on the Level of Technical Skills Employed by Healthcare Professionals During the Management of Cardiac Arrest.

Cardiac arrest (CA) remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and its incidence continues to increase. The median survival rate following in-hospital cardiac arrest in France is 19%. In Europe, it ranges from 15% to 34%. Effective management of cardiac arrest is therefore essential to reduce the mortality rate associated with in-hospital cardiac arrest.

However, cardiac arrest is a source of stress in conventional care settings. First, it is a life-threatening emergency in which the absence of effective management results in the patient's death. Furthermore, the occurrence of cardiac arrest in conventional hospital wards, particularly in pediatrics, is uncommon. Healthcare professionals are therefore not accustomed to encountering these situations, which may lead to apprehension, stress, and a lack of confidence in their skills when faced with cardiac arrest.

In this context, maintaining skills is essential to ensure effective management of cardiac arrest.

Providing open-access training in the workplace would make it possible to maintain a high level of proficiency over time while allowing healthcare professionals to remain at their workplace.

The expected benefits are improved management of patients experiencing cardiac arrest through regular training and maintenance of the technical skills of paramedical and medical healthcare professionals in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of a pre-/post-training intervention on the level of technical skills used by healthcare professionals in the management of cardiac arrest.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

Regular and ongoing training of healthcare professionals is essential to ensure effective management in the event of cardiac arrest.

Providing training within the care unit would increase the frequency of training sessions while reducing staff availability constraints, and could help maintain a high level of proficiency in CPR skills over time.

In 2015, Laerdal and the American Heart Association developed a resuscitation quality improvement program called RQI (Resuscitation Quality Improvement), enabling healthcare professionals to independently train in CPR techniques within their own department, with feedback on skills acquisition.

The RQI simulation-based self-training program is a self-directed learning system for basic CPR that complies with Basic Life Support (BLS) training, the international standard. Its objective is to improve CPR skills related to chest compressions and BVM ventilation, using auditory and visual feedback to support skills acquisition during simulated resuscitation.

The training method provides a certificate of successful completion every three months. However, learners may log in and train as often as they wish.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) simulation-based self-training program on the technical CPR skills used during cardiac arrest management among healthcare professionals working in three pediatric hospital departments at Trousseau Hospital (AP-HP, Paris).

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

265

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Paris, Francia, 75012
        • P₂ULSE

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

The study will include healthcare professionals working in one of the three departments of the A. Trousseau Children's Hospital: neonatal and pediatric intensive care, emergency department, and oncology/hematology.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

- Working in one of the 3 participating pediatric departments as a nursing assistant, nurse, physician, or healthcare manager

Exclusion Criteria:

- Objection to the collection of his data

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
the success rate (total score greater than or equal to 75%) of RQI program participants
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
the success rate (total score greater than or equal to 75%) of RQI program participants in order to evaluate the impact of the RQI self-training program on CPR technical skills
12 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the number of logins to the station
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the number of logins to the station in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the profession (Registered Nurse (RN), Nursing Assistant (NA), Physician)
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to the profession (Registered Nurse (RN), Nursing Assistant (NA), Physician) in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Professional experience (number of years)
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Professional experience (number of years) in order to evaluate the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to profile
baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Department/unit of practice in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills According to Profile
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to Department/unit of practice in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to Profile
baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to occurrence of a cardiac arrest in the department in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills According to Profile
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and 12 months
Success rate (score ≥ 75%) according to occurrence of a cardiac arrest in the department in order to evaluate of the Difference in Effectiveness of CPR Technical Skills according to Profile
baseline and 12 months
Evaluate learner satisfaction with the RQI training program using a satisfaction questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
Evaluate learner satisfaction with the RQI training program using a satisfaction questionnaire (score greater than or equal to 80%).
12 months
Number of technical malfunctions
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
the number of technical malfunctions in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months
Number of network problems
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
the number of network problems in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months
Number of system connection issues
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
the number of system connection issues, in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months
Number of simulator operation
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
the number of simulator operation in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months
Number of computer operation
Periodo de tiempo: 24 months
the number of computer operation in order to evaluate the technical operationality of the RQI system by compiling the number of technical malfunctions network problems, system connection issues, simulator and computer operation.
24 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Léopoldine Legrain, Nurse, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de septiembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de septiembre de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de septiembre de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

28 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de septiembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

15 de septiembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

15 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • APHP260482

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir