- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00010985
Usual Care Vs Choice of Alternative Rx: Low Back Pain
March 5, 2008 updated by: National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
This study compares two approaches to the management of acute low back pain: usual care (standard benefit) vs. the choice of: usual care, chiropractic, acupuncture or massage therapy (expanded benefit).
480 subjects with uncomplicated, acute low back pain will be recruited from a health maintenance organization, and randomized to either usual care (n=160) or choice of expanded benefits (n=320).
Patients' preferences for individual therapies and expectations of improvement will be measured at baseline and throughout the study.
Subjects randomized to the expanded benefits arm who choose chiropractic, acupuncture or massage will receive up to 10 treatments over a five-week period.
Additional treatments will be available after the fifth week but will require a copayment.
Treatments will be provided by licensed providers who have met strict credentialing criteria.
Chiropractic, acupuncture or massage treatments will begin within 48 hours.
Chiropractic, acupuncture and massage therapy scope of practice guidelines for the treatment of acute low back pain have been developed as have detailed data tracking procedures to be used at each patient visit.
Symptom relief, functional status, restricted activity days, use of health care, and patient and provider satisfaction will be assessed at 2, 5,12, 26 and 52 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Primary outcomes will include: 1) change in symptoms; 2) change in functional status; 3) patient satisfaction; and 4) total utilization of services associated with care for low back pain.
Medical records and the HMO's cost management information system will identify use of services.
It is hypothesized that patients offered their choice of expanded benefits will experience a more rapid improvement in symptoms, a faster return to baseline functional status, a decrease in utilization of conventional medical services, and will be more satisfied with their care.
The study is a direct examination of the effectiveness of an insurance eligibility intervention, not a test of the efficacy of specific, non-allopathic treatment regimens.
The results of this study will provide valuable information to clinicians, patients and third party payers on the relative benefits and costs of an "expanded benefits" treatment option which incorporates chiropractic, acupuncture and massage services for low back pain.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
See brief summary
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Harvard Medical School Osher Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Backpain for less than 21 days
- Backpain within the last 24 hours
- No prior treatment or evaluation for this episode of backpain
- Ability to read and speak English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not low backpain
- Backpain for >21 days
- Already evaluated for this episode of backpain
- Already treated with acupuncture, chiropractic, massage therapy, or physical therapy for this episode of backpain
- Osteoporosis
- Taking systemic corticosteroids
- Pregnancy
- History of cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
- Clotting disorders or currently taking anti-coagulant medication
- Severe or disabling co-exiting problem (e.g. fibromyalgia, substance abuse, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.)
- Unable to read or speak English
- History of back or neck surgery within the last 5 years
- History of vertebral fracture or dislocation
- Neurological symptoms suggestive of Cauda Equina Syndrome
- Requires immediate referral to specialist
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Eisenberg, MD, Harvard Medical School Osher Institute
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 1999
Study Completion
August 1, 2003
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2001
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 2, 2001
First Posted (Estimate)
February 5, 2001
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
March 7, 2008
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 5, 2008
Last Verified
March 1, 2008
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R01 AT000144-01M
- R01AT000144-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.