Seroquel in the Treatment of Dysphoric Hypomania in Bipolar II

September 26, 2017 updated by: Terrence Ketter, Stanford University

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Seroquel for the Treatment of Dysphoric Hypomania in Bipolar II Patients

  1. The primary objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of quetiapine (Seroquel) in treatment of dysphoric hypomania in patients with Bipolar II disorder.
  2. To evaluate the utility of Seroquel add-on treatment to decrease mixed depressive and hypomanic symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Bipolar disorder is recognized as a severe and treatment-refractory illness. Recent work from multiple research centers in both Europe and the U.S. have found the percentage of patients experiencing hypomania that are also experiencing depressive symptoms is substantial. In a recent Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network study, it was found that 60% of all visits with at least moderate hypomania were associated with depressive symptoms. It is generally agreed that patients experiencing mixed states or combinations of mania with depressive symptoms are less responsive to older treatments such as lithium (Swann et al., 1997). We propose evaluating the response to Seroquel add-on versus placebo add-on for those patients experiencing hypomania and depressive symptoms, either simultaneously or closely juxtaposed within a 2-3 day period.

Bipolar II (BDII) patients make up a substantial percentage of patients with bipolar disorder, estimated conservatively at 0.5% of the US population and, with somewhat more liberal definitions of hypomania minimum duration, in Europe at 1% or greater. Importantly, few to virtually no recent treatment trials of high quality have been undertaken in BDII. Treatment guidelines and algorithms for bipolar disorder have been unable to specify defined treatments for BDII due to the lack of studies. Juxtaposed to the limits of controlled data, preliminary case series and clinical experience support atypical antipsychotics will be helpful for BDII patients. Thus the impact is high for a placebo controlled study of Seroquel in BDII.

We believe that this study is important to undertake because of the limited controlled data available for the treatment and management of patients with bipolar II disorder in outpatient settings. Numerous placebo-controlled monotherapy studies have been completed in inpatient settings for bipolar I, many leading to FDA submissions for registration. Maintenance trials are underway or are being developed for bipolar I disorder. There are no medications specifically approved for use in bipolar II patients at this time.

Additionally, the initial trials for the registration of Seroquel for bipolar disorder did not include patients with mixed symptoms. Clear cut-offs were provided in order to minimize the likelihood that patients with mixed symptoms would enter these trials. Thus, the trial proposed will provide data useful to the clinician in a real world setting, as well as provide data in an area not previously covered by the trial registration studies. We hypothesize that Seroquel will be effective to treat such symptoms in patients with BDII.

A clinically important and ground breaking aspect of the proposed trial is the focus on patients with bipolar II disorder. There is a paucity of data available to evaluate the use of atypical antipsychotics in patients with bipolar II disorder. Preliminary data of any sort in this area will be clinically useful, set the stage for larger more definitive trials, and translate readily into practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Terence Ketter

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must meet criteria for DSM-IV TR diagnosis of bipolar II disorder, as assessed by the structured clinical interview mood modules (SCID) (First et al., 1996).
  • Must be hypomanic as rated by a >12 on the YMRS on two consecutive visits 1-3 days apart. And meet DSM IV TR criteria for hypomania
  • Must be experiencing depressive symptoms as rated by > 14 on the MADRS rated at two consecutive visits 1-3 days apart and experiencing depressive symptoms for at least a seven-day period.
  • Must be on stable medication regimens for at least two weeks, or on no medication at study entry.
  • Must be men or women age 18-65 years of age.
  • Must be able to give informed consent.
  • Must be able to comprehend and satisfactorily comply with protocol requirements.
  • If sexually active, females of child-bearing potential must be using a reliable method of contraception, which includes hormonal contraceptives, double-barrier methods (e.g., condom and foam, condom and diaphragm), intrauterine devices (IUD), or tubal ligation. Oral hormonal contraception is allowed as long as no other medications are being used that could decrease hormone levels and put the patient at risk for developing pregnancy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving any atypical antipsychotics (washout period to be determined by treating psychiatrist)
  • Receiving recognized antidepressant medication (within five half-lives), including serotonin reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine, bupropion, or nefazodone.
  • Receiving carbamazepine (within five half-lives).
  • Experienced a hypomanic episode judged to be a direct physiological consequence of any medical condition or treatment, including neurological disorders, cardiovascular disease, metabolic or autoimmune conditions.
  • Evidence that the patient is likely to need additional concomitant medical therapy during the trial.
  • Participated in another trial of an investigational drug/device *or received clozapine within 30 days prior to baseline.
  • Known hypersensitivity to Seroquel or any of its components.
  • Known intolerability or past history of ineffectiveness of Seroquel.
  • Met DSM-IV TR criteria for any substance or alcohol abuse or dependence disorder within the past month.
  • History or evidence of unstable medical condition or known clinically significant abnormal laboratory results.
  • Known or suspected chronic infectious disease including HIV or hepatitis.
  • Women who are currently pregnant or desire to become pregnant during the study or women nursing an infant.
  • Meet criteria for antisocial personality disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo
Experimental: Quetiapine/Seroquel
Quetiapine/Seroquel up to 800 mg/day
Quetiapine/Seroquel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorders Overall Severity
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

0-7 scale: rated on the following seven-point scale:) 0=not assessed, 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients.

This rating is based upon observed and reported symptoms, behavior, and function in the past seven days.

Baseline and 8 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorders Overall Severity Remission (Score <=2 at Week 8)
Time Frame: Week 8

0-7 scale: rated on the following seven-point scale:) 0=not assessed, 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients.

This rating is based upon observed and reported symptoms, behavior, and function in the past seven days.

Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With 50% Improvement From Baseline in Both Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
MADRS assesses change from baseline to endpoint. Higher score indicates more severe depression; each item yields a score of 0 to 6. Overall score ranges: 0 to 60. Questions following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts. Cutoff points:0 to 6- normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19- mild depression; 20 to 34- moderate depression; >34- severe depression. YMRS:a 11-item clinician-admin instrument assesses severity of mania. Symptoms rated: Elevated mood, Increased motor activity/energy, Sexual interest, Sleep, irritability, Speech, language/thought disorder, Content, Disruptive/aggressive behavior, Appearance, Insight. Each composed of five explicitly defined levels of severity. Severity ratings based on patient's subjective report of clinical condition during past 48 hours and clinician's observations.
Baseline and 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Terence Ketter, MD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe