An Effectiveness and Safety Study Comparing Acetaminophen (3900 mg/Day) to Ibuprofen (1200 mg/Day) in the Treatment of Post-Race Muscle Soreness.

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Evaluating Acetaminophen Extended Release Caplets (3900 mg/Day) and Ibuprofen (1200 mg/Day) in the Treatment of Post-Race Muscle Soreness.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of acetaminophen extended release caplets and ibuprofen in relieving the muscle soreness that occurs after a marathon.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The objective of this randomized, double-blind study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of acetaminophen extended release caplets and ibuprofen in relieving the muscle soreness that occurs in subjects who complete a marathon. Subjects are randomized to receive acetaminophen extended release caplets, 3900 mg/day (two 650 mg caplets taken three times a day, for five days) or ibuprofen caplets, 1200 mg/day (two 200 mg caplets taken three times a day, for five days). The primary measurement of efficacy is the average change in muscle soreness from baseline for both the morning and evening assessments. Safety assessments consist of monitoring adverse events, and a physical examination including vital signs, weight, a review of concomitant medications, and a urine pregnancy test for female subjects. Two hypotheses are examined in a step-down approach. The first hypothesis is that acetaminophen extended release is not inferior to ibuprofen in relieving the muscle soreness that occurs after a marathon. If acetaminophen extended release is not inferior to ibuprofen in relieving the muscle soreness that occurs after a marathon, the second hypothesis is that acetaminophen extended release (3900 mg/day) is superior to ibuprofen (1200 mg/day) in relieving the muscle soreness that occurs after a marathon. Two acetaminophen 650 mg extended release caplets, taken by mouth, three times a day for five days or two ibuprofen 200 mg caplets, taken by mouth, three times a day for five days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

483

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must complete the marathon
  • be able to swallow the study medication
  • comply with study requirements regarding the use of any other pain medications before, during or after the marathon
  • rate their muscle soreness on the evening after the marathon as at least a 4, on a zero-to-ten point scale
  • if female, must not be pregnant or breastfeeding, and must be using an acceptable form of contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of osteoarthritis requiring pain medication therapy
  • currently have a major medical illness
  • have a history of cardiovascular disease, heat injury (heat exhaustion or heat stroke) or collapse during a running or endurance event
  • known hypersensitivity to acetaminophen or ibuprofen

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Average change in muscle soreness from baseline for both morning and evening assessments.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Average change in muscle soreness from baseline for morning assessments; Average change in muscle soreness from baseline for evening assessments; Average ratings of interference with 1) sleep; 2) morning activity; 3) ability to go for a run

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe