Gamma Vacuum Foil (GVF) Versus Cross-linked Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty Study

March 23, 2017 updated by: DePuy Orthopaedics

Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Study of GVF Versus Cross-linked Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic data between geometrically identical GVF and cross-linked polyethylene-bearing inserts in total knee arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In 1996, Gamma Vacuum Foil (GVF) polyethylene was introduced as the first polyethylene to be gamma irradiated and packaged in an inert environment. This polyethylene, with its patented process and packaging, continues to be the only barrier-packaged process that is impermeable to both Hydrogen (H2) and Oxygen (O2), and allows the polyethylene to recombine and cross-link in the package. Though the new moderately cross-linked polyethylene being evaluated in this protocol is comparable to GVF geometrically and mechanically, the P.F.C.® Sigma™ cross-linked polyethylene also has the added benefit of being completely oxidatively stable both on the shelf and in-vivo.

The P.F.C. Sigma tibial tray component being assessed in this study is made of Cobalt Chrome (CoCr). The new CoCr tibial tray has the same design geometrically as the original titanium (Ti) tray, however, it features a highly polished top surface where it is joined to the polyethylene. This polished surface is designed to decrease the coefficient of friction between the polyethylene and the tray, thus minimizing backside wear. A comparative clinical study will be conducted to evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic data between geometrically identical cemented implants using GVF and crosslinked polyethylene tibial tray bearing inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) using the P.F.C. Sigma Total Knee System. Patients will be assigned to study treatment groups at random if they meet specific demographic and pathophysiologic criteria for cemented total knee arthroplasty. The anticipated duration of this investigation is a minimum six years, which includes a one-year enrollment phase.

The specific aims of this study are as follows:

  1. Examine whether crosslinked polyethylene performs as well, if not better, than GVF polyethylene through standard clinical evaluations.
  2. Evaluate long-term survivorship rates.
  3. Report complications/adverse events.
  4. Report radiographic findings of geometrically identical implants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

938

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36608
        • Alabama Orthopaedic Clinic
    • California
      • Berkley, California, United States, 94705
        • Pacific Bone and Joint Clinic
    • Colorado
      • Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80525
        • Orthopedic Center of the Rockies
    • Florida
      • Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33308
        • Holy Cross Hospital
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32817
        • Jewett Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32792
        • Jewett Orthopaedic Clinic
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60153
        • Loyola University
      • Rockford, Illinois, United States, 61107
        • Rockford Orthopedic Associates
    • Pennsylvania
      • York, Pennsylvania, United States, 17402
        • Orthopaedic & Spine Specialists

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Osteoarthritis of the affected joint appropriate for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
  2. Diagnosis of any of the following: rheumatoid or other inflammatory arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
  3. Radiographic evidence of sufficient sound bone stock to seat and support the prosthesis.
  4. Subject requires a primary total knee replacement and is considered to be suitable for the specific knee prosthesis identified in protocol.
  5. Subject has given consent to the transfer of his/her information to sponsor.
  6. Subject will be compliant with requirements of protocol by returning for follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of recent/active joint sepsis.
  2. Charcot neuropathy.
  3. Psycho-social disorders that would limit rehabilitation.
  4. Women who are pregnant or planning on being pregnant.
  5. Greater than 80 years of age at the time of surgery.
  6. Prior ipsilateral knee arthroplasty.
  7. Metabolic disorders of calcified tissues, such as Paget's disease.
  8. Severe diabetes mellitus that is not controlled by diet or oral agents.
  9. Require joint replacement due to immunodeficiency syndromes.
  10. Skeletal immaturity.
  11. Avascular necrosis of the affected knee.
  12. Chronic renal disease.
  13. Subjects involved in medical-legal or worker's compensation claims.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: GVF
Gamma Vacuum Foil polyethylene tibial insert
Gamma Vacuum Foil polyethylene tibial insert
cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert
Other Names:
  • P.F.C. Sigma cross-linked bearing
Active Comparator: P.F.C.
Cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert
Gamma Vacuum Foil polyethylene tibial insert
cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert
Other Names:
  • P.F.C. Sigma cross-linked bearing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survivorship (Revision of Any Component for Any Reason)
Time Frame: 5 years
Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis estimates the proportion of a population that will survive past a certain time avoiding a certain event. In this study, the event is removal of any component for any reason, also known as revision for any reason. Survival estimates are provided when 40 devices are left still being followed.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score
Time Frame: 2 year
American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.
2 year
American Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score
Time Frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score
Time Frame: 2 year
WOMAC is a patient reported outcome (PRO) that evaluates the condition of subjects with knee osteoarthritis, and includes pain (score range 0-20), stiffness (score range 0-8), and physical function (score range 0-68) of the joint. The total score ranged from 0 to 96. The subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score, where a lower score indicates a better outcome.
2 year
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score
Time Frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
WOMAC is a patient reported outcome (PRO) that evaluates the condition of subjects with knee osteoarthritis, and includes pain (score range 0-20), stiffness (score range 0-8), and physical function (score range 0-68) of the joint. The total score ranged from 0 to 96. The subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score, where a lower score indicates a better outcome.
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Radiolucencies (>2mm)
Time Frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Radiolucencies (>2mm)
Time Frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Osteolysis (>2mm)
Time Frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Osteolysis (>2mm)
Time Frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gracia Etienne, MD, Orthopaedic & Spine Specialists
  • Principal Investigator: Michael L. Granberry, MD, Alabama Orthopaedic Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Richard M. Konsens, MD, Jewett Orthopaedic Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe