Feasibility of n-of-1 Trials - a Pilot Study

September 1, 2006 updated by: University of Bristol

Pilot Study of the Feasibility of n-of-1 Trials: the Individualisation of Treatments for Osteoarthritis

The aim of this study was to provide essential pilot data on the feasibility of conducting n-of-1 trials within secondary care within the UK, notably to: test the process of recruitment and design aspects of such trials; assess the acceptability of this research method to patients, explore the experiences of patients involved; determine the most appropriate treatment for individual patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Whilst the large scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) remains the scientific "gold standard" for evaluating therapies in clinical medicine, the assumption made, that the treatment effect demonstrated is generalisable and applicable to all patients, is unlikely to be true. There will inevitably be some patients who benefit from a particular treatment more than others. N-of-1 trials are a means of conducting RCTs in individual patients with the added opportunity to use patient generated outcome measures. Patients act as their own control and receive all treatments under comparison, more than once, in a random sequence. While n-of-1 trial methodology is reasonably well specified they remain under-exploited and little is known about the process aspects of conducting such trials or the experiences and views of those who participate in them. The time commitment by patients and health professionals is not inconsiderable and there may well be particular problems with recruitment and drop out. N-of-1 trials rely on co-operation between individual clinicians and patients, however, no work has been undertaken to explore the ways in which patient-practitioner relationships and their experiences and views influence the progress and outcome of n-of-1 trials.

Patients with confirmed osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, selected for a mix of gender, age, weight, will be recruited to the n-of-1 trials to compare either, an NSAID (diclofenac) with simple analgesic (paracetamol) or a standard knee support with a heat retaining support. Patients will undergo a (1 hour) semi-structured interview before the trial commences and once the trial is completed or terminated. Patients treated with supports/drugs will receive each treatment for a period of one/two weeks respectively, for 3 cycles (order determined at random). Patients will complete daily diaries including standard patient questionnaires and a patient generated outcome measure. Qualitative interviews and observational methods will be employed to study practitioner/ patient relationships; decision to participate; expectations and experience; appropriateness and acceptability of research design and measures. Patients declining to take part will be approached to explore reasons for not participating.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

10

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients attending clinics in the North Bristol Health Care Trust, with confirmed OA of the knee (Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic score of 2-4 within the previous 12 months) and use-related pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had received corticosteroid injections or operations on their knee in the previous six months were excluded. Those with known contraindications to paracetamol or any NSAID, and those taking steroids, warfarin or aspirin for another medical condition were excluded from the drug trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Paul Dieppe, MRC Health Services Research Collaboration

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2001

Study Completion

December 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2006

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2006

Last Verified

January 1, 2003

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe