A Study in Korea of Entecavir Versus Lamivudine in Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

November 6, 2014 updated by: Bristol-Myers Squibb

A Phase IV Study of the Antiviral Activity and Safety of Entecavir Versus Lamivudine in Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Who Are Negative for Hepatitis B e Antigen in Korea

Entecavir, 0.5 mg daily, will have clinical efficacy (assessed as an undetectable hepatitis B DNA, <300 copies/mL, by Roche Comprehensive Bio-Analytical System Amplicor polymerase chain reaction assay) that is comparable (noninferior) and potentially superior to lamivudine, 100 mg once daily, in adults with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bucheon, Korea, Republic of, 420-717
        • Local Institution
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of, 602-739
        • Local Institution
      • Chuncheon, Korea, Republic of, 200-704
        • Local Institution
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 700-721
        • Local Institution
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 705-030
        • Local Institution
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of, 301-721
        • Local Institution
      • Guri, Korea, Republic of, 471-020
        • Local Institution
      • Jeonju, Korea, Republic of, 561-180
        • Local Institution
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
        • Local Institution
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 136-705
        • Local Institution
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 130-702
        • Local Institution
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-270
        • Local Institution
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-040
        • Local Institution
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 150-950
        • Local Institution
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 152-050
        • Local Institution

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nucleoside and nucleotide-naive subjects with chronic HBV infection
  • Hepatitis B Surface antigen(HBsAg)-positive ≥6 months
  • Detectable HBsAg
  • HBV DNA ≥ 105 copies/mL by PCR
  • ALT 1.3 to 10 x the ULN
  • HBeAg negative, anti-hepatitis B Virus E antigen antibody (anti-HBeAb) positive status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A

Entecavir + Lamivudine placebo (0-96 weeks)

Entecavir (96-240 weeks)

Tablets, Oral, 0.5 mg, once daily (0-96 weeks) and (96-240 weeks)
Other Names:
  • Baraclude
  • BMS-200475
Capsules, Oral, 0 mg, once daily (0-96 weeks)
Active Comparator: Arm B

Lamivudine + Entecavir placebo (0-96 weeks)

Lamivudine (96-240 weeks)

Capsules, Oral, 100 mg, once daily (0-96 weeks)

Tablets, Oral, 100 mg, once daily (96-240 weeks)

Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, once daily (0-96 weeks)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Virologic Response at Week 24
Time Frame: At Week 24
Virologic response=Hepatitis B virus DNA <300 copies/mL by polymerase chain reaction assay.
At Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA <10^3, <10^4, or < 10^5 Copies/mL by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assy at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Time Frame: At Weeks 24, 48, and 96
The number and percentage of participants achieving the following endpoints will be tabulated at each visit through Week 240 by treatment group: HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by PCR assay; HBV DNA <10^3, <10^4, or < 10^5 copies/mL by PCR assay. Treatment comparisons will be assessed using the same method as the primary endpoint.
At Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Mean Log10 Reduction From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA at Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time Frame: At Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Mean log10 reduction from Baseline in HBV DNA virus by the Roche Comprehensive Bio-Analytical System Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay at Week 24. The extent of the decrease was estimated by comparing HBV DNA levels of all participants in each group with a linear regression model with covariates of treatment and baseline HBV DNA by PCR assay.
At Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Mean Laboratory Test Values for Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Week 24
Time Frame: At Week 24
Mean ALT values from baseline by laboratory test. .
At Week 24
Number of Participants With Normalization of Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Time Frame: At Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Normalization of serum ALT= ≤*institutional upper limit of normal.
At Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Number of Participants With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs), Most Common AEs, and Grade 3/4 AEs at Week 24
Time Frame: Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (Week 24) + 5 days and to end of 24-week follow-up period
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Most common AEs=AEs affecting ≥3 participants. Grade 3 (Severe)/Grade 4 (Very Severe)AEs per World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.Serious adverse events/deaths reported for enrolled patients regardless of treatment status.
Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (Week 24) + 5 days and to end of 24-week follow-up period
Number of Participants With Elevations in Alanine Transaminase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminoaminase (AST) Levels, Elevations in ALT and AST Levels,Simultaneous Elevations in ALT and Total Bilirubin Levels, and ALT Flares at Week 24
Time Frame: Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (24 weeks) + 5 days and to end of 24-week follow-up period
ALT flares=ALT>2*Baseline and 10*upper limit of normal. Serious adverse events/deaths reported for enrolled patients regardless of treatment status.
Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (24 weeks) + 5 days and to end of 24-week follow-up period
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Abnormalities in Laboratory Test Results by World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria at Week 24
Time Frame: Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (Week 24) + 5 days and to the end of the 24-week follow-up period
ULN=upper limit of normal; ALT=alanine transaminase. WHO criteria: Grade 3=Severe (inability to carry out usual activity); Grade 4=Very severe (debilitating or significantly incapacitating patient despite symptomatic treatment).
Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (Week 24) + 5 days and to the end of the 24-week follow-up period
Number of Participants With Clinically or Statistically Significant Changes in Vital Sign Measurements at Week 24
Time Frame: Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (Week 24) + 5 days and to end of 24-week follow-up period
Vital signs assessed included blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, and respiration rate.
Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (Week 24) + 5 days and to end of 24-week follow-up period
Number of Participants With Virologic Rebound at Week 24
Time Frame: At Week 24
Virologic rebound was defined as a confirmed ≥1 log10 increase in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA from nadir on blinded treatment (as determined by 2 sequential HBV DNA measurements or last on-treatment measurement).
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response as Defined by Undetectable Hepatitis B Virus DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time Frame: At Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Undetectable HBV DNA= <300 copies/mL by polymerase chain reaction assay
At Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Number of Participants With Viral Rebound and Drug-resistant Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA Mutations at Week 96
Time Frame: At 96 weeks
Virologic rebound was defined as a confirmed ≥1 log10 increase in HBV DNA from nadir on blinded treatment (as determined by 2 sequential HBV DNA values or last on-treatment measurement).
At 96 weeks
Number of Participants With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs), Most Common AEs, and Grade 3/4 AEs at Week 240
Time Frame: Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (Week 240) + 5 days
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
Start of dosing (Day 1) until end of treatment (Week 240) + 5 days
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Abnormalities in Laboratory Test Results by World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria at Week 96
Time Frame: Start of dosing (Day 1) until Week 96
ULN=upper limit of normal; ALT=alanine transaminase. WHO criteria: Grade 3=Severe (inability to carry out usual activity); Grade 4=Very severe (debilitating or significantly incapacitating patient despite symptomatic treatment).
Start of dosing (Day 1) until Week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 26, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe