Trial of Patient Navigation-Activation

August 6, 2013 updated by: University of Rochester

RCT of Primary Care-based Patient Navigation-Activation

The University of Rochester, Department of Family Medicine, funded by the National Cancer Institute will train community health workers to guide patients through the cancer care system. The project will help to teach patients how to communicate more effectively with their health care team in order to understand the treatment options available to them. Although not widely available, it is believed patient navigation programs are beneficial.

This research study will evaluate how well this tool works, especially among those who experience disparities in health care. The goal is to determine if having a trained navigator shortens the time between an abnormal test result and a definitive diagnosis and between a definitive diagnosis and completion of treatment for breast and colorectal cancer patients. The project also will evaluate whether navigation improves the ability to communicate with the doctor, patient satisfaction with care and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Racial and ethnic minority groups and low-income persons experience significantly higher cancer mortality rates than other Americans. These disparities are due to at least two factors: (1) delays in follow-up of abnormal cancer screening results and (2) suboptimal management of diagnosed cancer. Patient navigation represents a promising means for addressing disparities by improving cancer related management for minority and other underserved populations. However, patient navigation for cancer has yet to be evaluated through a well-designed randomized controlled trial. Furthermore, patient navigation is likely to prove most effective and sustainable when it is integrated into primary care and helps patients be more active in their care. This combination of patient empowerment and enablement is referred to as "activation." The aim of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness and costs of such a program in a rigorous manner so that the results can be generalized and the program can be widely disseminated and implemented. we will develop, implement, and evaluate a primary care-based, patient navigation-activation program using specially-trained community health workers (CHWs). We propose to investigate the effect of this intervention on timing and quality of cancer-related care. Secondary aims examine the impact of navigation on disparities in care, improvement in patient activation and total costs. Project findings will inform national policy regarding patient navigation for cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

900

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Receive care at a participating practice
  2. Have received a positive breast or colorectal cancer screening test requiring follow-up on a different day
  3. Have been newly diagnosed with breast or colorectal cancer
  4. Have received notification by the provider of an abnormal breast or colorectal screening result

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitively impaired
  2. Institutionalized (nursing home, incarcerated)
  3. Children <18
  4. Actively involved in cancer treatment at time of presentation
  5. Currently or previously navigated with (a) navigation documented in the medical record or (b) patient can articulate that they are in a navigation program or case management program for cancer
  6. History of prior invasive cancer, lymphoma, or leukemia except non-melanoma (basal or squamous of the skin) cancer or CIN (Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia).
  7. Prior cancer that has been treated-The rationale for excluding patients with any prior cancers that have been treated is that patient familiarity with the treatment process in general would make care easier even without a navigator.
  8. Women who are pregnant at time of enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Navigation
Navigation through the cancer care system is the intervention
Cancer patients are randomly assigned to receive standard of care or the help of a trained person to navigated them through the cancer care system
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Cancer patient receives standard of care.
Cancer patients receive standard of care for their cancer treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To develop, implement, and evaluate a primary care-based, patient navigation program using specially-trained community health workers. We will investigate the effect of this intervention on timing and quality of cancer-related care.
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Secondary aims examine the impact of navigation on disparities in care, improvement in patient activation and total costs.
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Fiscella, M.D., MPH, University of Rochester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

July 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 9, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe