Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Enbrel (Etanercept) in Japan

January 9, 2017 updated by: Pfizer

Enbrel Special Use Result Surveillance

The special use-results surveillance is conducted in patients who have never been treated with Enbrel and in whom its long-term therapy may be instituted in the actual setting of use after marketing with the following objectives: 1. To examine the safety of long-term use of Enbrel including the occurrence of malignant tumors. 2. To confirm the efficacy of Enbrel in the long-term use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

684

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sapporo, Japan, 060-8638
        • Hokkaido University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Hospital and Rheumatology clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fulfill all of the following

  1. Patients who are refractory to the treatment.
  2. Patients who have never been treated with Enbrel and in whom its long-term therapy may be instituted.
  3. Patients without a history of or concurrent malignant tumors.

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants in Safety Analysis Population of Etanercept
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events of Etanercept
Time Frame: 3 years
Adverse events are all unfavorable events, including clinically problematic abnormal changes in laboratory test values, which develop in participants after the administration of Etanercept, irrespective of causal relationship to Etanercept. The causal relationship between an adverse event and Etanercept was evaluated by the sponsor.
3 years
Number of Participants With Serious Treatment Related Adverse Events of Etanercept
Time Frame: 3 years
Serious treatment-related adverse events are defined as any events that lead to death, life-threatening, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, a permanent or remarkable disorder/dysfunction, congenital anomaly/congenital deficiency, or other medically significant events or disorder.
3 years
Number of Participants With Unlisted Treatment Related Adverse Events of Etanercept
Time Frame: 3 years
Adverse events are all unfavorable events, including clinically problematic abnormal changes in laboratory test values, which develop in participants after the administration of Etanercept, irrespective of causal relationship to Etanercept. The causal relationship between an adverse event and Etanercept was evaluated by the sponsor. Unlisted treatment related adverse events were confirmed with listed adverse drug reactions specified in Japanese package insert.
3 years
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Improvement (4/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate: ESR)
Time Frame: 2 years
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 = remission.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) Score
Time Frame: 2 years
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire-(mHAQ): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
2 years
Visual Analog Fatigue Scale (VAFS)
Time Frame: 2 years
Participants assessed their fatigue using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue.
2 years
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Improvement (3/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate: ESR)
Time Frame: 2 years
DAS28-3 (ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count and ESR (mm/hour). Total score range: 0-9.4, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-3 (ESR) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (ESR) <2.6 = remission.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe