PERG and mfPERG in Band Atrophy

August 4, 2011 updated by: University of Sao Paulo

Pattern Electroretinogram and Multifocal Pattern Electroretinogram For the Detection of Neural Loss in Patients With Permanent Temporal Visual Field Defect From Chiasmal Compression

The study is designed to evaluate the ability of pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and multifocal pattern electroretinogram (mfPERG) to measure and identify the pattern of band atrophy of the optic nerve in patients with long standing chiasmal lesions. The hypothesis is that these electrophysiological tests were able to identify this such pattern. The idea is to investigate the ability of the these electrophysiological technics in detecting the neural loss from chiasmal compression and to evaluate the ability of PERG and mfPERG parameters to differentiate between eyes with band atrophy of the optic nerve and healthy eyes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
      • São Paulo, Brazil, 05403-000
        • Universidade de São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with band atrophy from chismal compression and controls

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Visual acuity better than 20/30
  2. Refractive error less 5 spherical diopter and 3 cylinder diopter
  3. Temporal field defect

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of glaucoma and optic nerve anomalies
  2. Anormal nasal field

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of Sao Paulo

Collaborators

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mário Luiz R Monteiro, PhD, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2011

Last Verified

November 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 654/06
  • FAPESP 06/61549-6; 07/54142-0)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe