- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00558324
Corneal Flap Thickness Planed vs Measured After LASIK by Using Tree Different Systems Cut
November 12, 2007 updated by: Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México
Determine the flap thickness created by femtosecond laser or a mechanical microkeratome using in vivo confocal microscopy and compare measured versus intended flap thickness.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Eighty-six eyes had undergone LASIK were examined, al within 2 weeks to 1 month after surgery.
Study involved 3 treatment groups: One with 30 eyes of 15 patients, corneal flaps were created with the microkeratome femtosecond laser 15 KHz 100μm (Intralase Corp, Irvine, Calif.), one with 30 eyes of 15 patients, corneal flaps were created with mechanical microkeratome (Hansatome 160μm (Chiron Vision Corp, Claremont, Calif) and one with 26 eyes of 13 patients, corneal flaps were created with mechanical microkeratome K3000 130μm ( BD Ophthalmic Systems, Waltham, Mass) .
A central scan of the total corneal thickness was taken with the confocal microscope (Confoscan 4, Fortune Technologies, Italy) before and at 2 weeks and 1 month after surgery.
Corneal epithelial thickness and the Anterior stroma morphology were analyzed by using the NAVIS software V. 3.5.0
(NIDEK, Multi-Instrument Diagnostic System, Japan).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
43
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Distrito Federal
-
México city, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 04030
- Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en Mëxico, Hospital "Luis Sánchez Bulnes".
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients ask for LASIK surgery
- Patients with stable refraction in the last year
- Patients without systemic and ocular disease
- Patients with 500 microns in pachymetry
- Normal topography
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients cannot attend their appointments
- Residual, recurrent or active ocular disease
- Previous ocular surgery except LASIK
- Autoimmune or connective tissue disease
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: I
Corneal flaps were created with mechanical microkeratome (Hansatome 160μm (Chiron Vision Corp, Claremont, Calif)
|
Mechanical microkeratome Hansatome 160 microns
Mechanical microkeratome K 3000 130 microns
Femtoseconds laser 100 microns
|
Experimental: II
Corneal flaps were created with mechanical microkeratome K3000 130μm ( BD Ophthalmic Systems, Waltham, Mass) .
|
Mechanical microkeratome Hansatome 160 microns
Mechanical microkeratome K 3000 130 microns
Femtoseconds laser 100 microns
|
Experimental: III
Corneal flaps were created with microkeratome femtoseconds laser (Intralase Corp, Irvine, Calif.)
|
Mechanical microkeratome Hansatome 160 microns
Mechanical microkeratome K 3000 130 microns
Femtoseconds laser 100 microns
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Measured thickness flap using Confocal microscopy study
Time Frame: 14 days after LASIK
|
14 days after LASIK
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ramírez F. Manuel, MD, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera
- Study Chair: Ramírez G. Laura, MD, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Huhtala A, Pietila J, Makinen P, Suominen S, Seppanen M, Uusitalo H. Corneal flap thickness with the Moria M2 single-use head 90 microkeratome. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Jun;85(4):401-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00838.x.
- Sarayba MA, Ignacio TS, Binder PS, Tran DB. Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, IntraLase femtosecond laser 15- and 30-kHz microkeratomes. Cornea. 2007 May;26(4):446-51. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318033e7cc.
- Hoffmann S, Krummenauer F, Tehrani M, Dick HB. Impact of head advance and oscillation rate on the flap parameter: a comparison of two microkeratomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;241(2):149-53. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0599-z. Epub 2003 Jan 28.
- Belin MW, Schultze RL. Microkeratomes. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2000 Summer;40(3):57-65. doi: 10.1097/00004397-200007000-00008. No abstract available.
- Eisner RA, Binder PS. Technique for measuring laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness using the IntraLase laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Apr;32(4):556-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.003.
- Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.046.
- Solomon KD, Donnenfeld E, Sandoval HP, Al Sarraf O, Kasper TJ, Holzer MP, Slate EH, Vroman DT; Flap Thickness Study Group. Flap thickness accuracy: comparison of 6 microkeratome models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 May;30(5):964-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.01.023.
- Ismail MM. LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 for the correction of hyperopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2006 Nov;22(9 Suppl):S1069-72. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20061102-11.
- Dougherty PJ. The thin-flap LASIK technique. J Refract Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5 Suppl):S650-4. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20050902-19.
- Montes-Mico R, Rodriguez-Galietero A, Alio JL. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.019. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
- Ramirez M, Hernandez-Quintela E, Naranjo-Tackman R. A comparative confocal microscopy analysis after LASIK with the IntraLase femtosecond laser vs Hansatome microkeratome. J Refract Surg. 2007 Mar;23(3):305-7. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070301-15.
- Ramirez M, Hernandez-Quintela E, Sanchez-Huerta V, Naranjo-Tackman R. Confocal microscopy of corneal flap microfolds after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2006 Feb;22(2):155-8. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20060201-13.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Study Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2007
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 12, 2007
First Posted (Estimate)
November 14, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 14, 2007
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 12, 2007
Last Verified
November 1, 2007
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Cornea 1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors
-
Suzan A RattanCompletedRefractive Errors | Refractive SurgeryIraq
-
London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineBritish Council for Prevention of Blindness; Tanzanian Society for the BlindCompletedUnder- and Uncorrected Significant Refractive ErrorsTanzania
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.TerminatedRefractive Error CorrectionUnited States
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityNot yet recruitingRefractive Errors
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.CompletedRefractive ErrorUnited States
-
Alcon ResearchCompleted
-
Alcon ResearchCompletedRefractive ErrorsUnited States
-
Alcon ResearchCompletedRefractive ErrorsUnited States
-
Wang HongxiaTianjin Eye HospitalUnknownRefractive ErrorChina
Clinical Trials on LASIK
-
Technolas Perfect Vision GmbHUnknownHyperopic PresbyopiaIreland
-
Taipei Nobel Eye ClinicCompleted
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedAstigmatism | Myopia | Myopic Astigmatism
-
Durrie VisionAlcon ResearchUnknown
-
Innovative MedicalCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Fort Belvoir Community HospitalWalter Reed National Military Medical Center; US Army Night Vision and Electronic...CompletedMyopia | Myopic AstigmatismUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
University of MichiganWithdrawn
-
Instituto de Olhos de GoianiaCompletedAnisometropiaBrazil