Open Label Study of Adalimumab in Subjects Who Have a Sub-optimal Response to Systemic Therapy or Phototherapy

April 8, 2011 updated by: Abbott
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of Humira (adalimumab) in patients who had a sub-optimal response to prior systemic therapy. This open-label study was conducted in a patient population of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis patients, which is an approved patient population for adalimumab.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This 16-week multicenter, open-label study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a loading dose of 80 mg adalimumab, followed by 40 mg adalimumab every other week in the treatment of psoriasis in patients with a sub-optimal response to etanercept, methotrexate (MTX), or Narrow band Ultraviolet - B (NB-UVB).

Approximately 150 participants were planned for 3 sub-studies: 80 participants with sub-optimal response to etanercept, 40 participants with sub-optimal response to MTX, and 30 participants with sub-optimal response to NB-UVB. Actual enrollment was 82 participants with sub-optimal response to etanercept, 41 participants with sub-optimal response to MTX, and 29 participants with sub-optimal response to NB-UVB.

Screening was performed at least 96 hours and no more than 31 days before the Baseline visit (Week 0). A participant who was eligible for the study based on sub-optimal response to one treatment (MTX, NB-UVB, or etanercept) was required to discontinue that treatment within a specified time before first dose of adalimumab (see descriptions of sub-study groups). In addition, if the participant was also receiving another qualifying treatment, he/she was required to have discontinued the other treatment at least 30 days before the Baseline visit (Week 0).

Adalimumab was administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection. At the Baseline Visit (Week 0), all participants received an initial dose of 80 mg adalimumab SC. Every other week (odd-numbered weeks) from Week 1 to Week 15, participants received 40 mg adalimumab SC.

This was a single group assignment study, that is, all participants received the same treatment; however, data were summarized for 3 groups (sub-studies) that were defined by psoriasis treatments participants received before entering this study: methotrexate, etanercept, or narrow-band, ultraviolet-B.

Efficacy was evaluated using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of disease severity, and patient-reported outcomes: Patient's Global Assessment (PTGA) of disease severity, the Psoriasis-related Pruritus Assessment, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), a visual analog scale (VAS) for plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis pain, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP).

Serious and nonserious adverse events were summarized by sub-study of participants (suboptimal response to MTX, suboptimal response to NB-UVB, and suboptimal response to etanercept).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

152

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2S 3B3
        • Kirk Barber Research
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5K 1X3
        • Stratica Medical
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 1Z4
        • Eastern Canada Cutaneous Research Associates
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 1V6
        • Dermatrials Research
      • Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2J 1C4
        • K.Papp Clinical Research Inc
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Siena Medical Research
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, G1V 4X7
        • Centre de Rescherche Dermatologique Du Quebec Metropolitain
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
        • Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Centers
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • Dermatology Research of Arkansas
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Therapeutics Clinical Research
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Florida Academic Dermatology Centers
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30327
        • Peachtree Dermatology Associates
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46256
        • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group
    • Massachusetts
      • Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01810
        • ORA Clinical Research and Development
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montifiore Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University School of Medicine
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103
        • Paddington Testing Co.
    • Rhode Island
      • Johnston, Rhode Island, United States, 02919
        • Clinical Partners
    • South Carolina
      • Greer, South Carolina, United States, 29651
        • Radiant Research
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Baylor Research Institute
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
        • Dermatology Treatment & Research Center, PA Research
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77058
        • Center for Clinical Studies
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Dermatology Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis with disease duration of at least 6 months
  • Sub-optimal response to treatment with etanercept, methotrexate, or narrow-band UVB phototherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with adalimumab
  • Multiple concomitant therapy restrictions and/or washouts (topicals, ultraviolet, other systemic psoriasis therapies)
  • Prior treatment with natalizumab
  • Concurrent active skin diseases/infections
  • Poorly controlled medical conditions
  • History of neurologic symptoms suggestive of central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease
  • History of certain cancers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Open Label
Participants received an 80 mg adalimumab loading dose by subcutaneous injection at Baseline (Week 0). From Week 1 to Week 15, participants received 40 mg adalimumab by subcutaneous injection every other week.
Other Names:
  • ABT-D2E7
  • Humira

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of a patient's disease. Plaque elevation, scaling, and erythema are rated from 0= clear (no plaque elevation; no scaling; erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration) to 5=very severe (plaque elevation=very marked; scaling=very coarse; erythema=very severe [extreme red coloration, dusky to deep red coloration]).
Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Achieving a PGA of Clear (0) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
Week 16
Number of Participants Achieving at Least 1 Grade of Improvement in PGA at Week 16 Compared to Screening
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16
From Screening to Week 16
Number of Participants Achieving 0 or 1 on Patient's Global Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, and 8
The Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis-Severity is a rating of how well their disease is controlled. 0=complete disease control; 1=good disease control; 2=limited disease control; 3=uncontrolled disease.
Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 4 and Week 16
The DLQI has 10 items and 6 subscales: symptoms and feelings (Q 1 and 2), daily activities (Q 3 and 4), leisure (Q 5 and 6), work and school (Q 7), personal relationships (Q 8 and 9), and treatment (Q 10). Participants rate how much their skin problem affected their life in previous week. Responses are 0 (not at all) to 3=very much. DLQI=total of scores for all items; max=30; min=0.
From Screening to Week 4 and Week 16
Number of Participants Achieving DLQI Total Score of 0 at Week 4 and Week 16
Time Frame: Week 4 and Week 16
DLQI total score of 0 indicates psoriasis had no effect at all on participant's life.
Week 4 and Week 16
Psoriasis-related Pruritus Assessment
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16
The Psoriasis-related Pruritus Assessment is a scale for evaluating pruritus-related to psoriasis over the previous week; values range from 0 (no itching) to 10 (severe itching). A decrease in score indicates an improvement in pruritus.
From Screening to Week 16
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Involving Psoriatic Plaques and/or Psoriatic Arthritis
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16
The participant rates his/her pain during the previous week on a 100 mm VAS, from 0=no pain to 100=pain as bad as it could be. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
From Screening to Week 16
Percent Work Time Missed Due to Psoriasis
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16
Work and activity impairment due to psoriasis were evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), a 6-item questionnaire that measures effect of psoriasis on number of hours worked and the number of hours missed from work. It also measures the effect on productivity and regular activities: 0=no effect on work/daily activities; 10=psoriasis prevented me from working/doing daily activities. Decreases in values on each part indicate improvement. At Screening, percent time missed in the previous week ranged from 0% to 40%.
From Screening to Week 16
Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Psoriasis
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16
Percent overall work impairment was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) (described above). At Screening, overall impairment ranged from 0% to 94%. A decrease in percent overall work impairment indicates improvement.
From Screening to Week 16
Percent Impairment While Working Due to Psoriasis
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16
Percent impairment while working was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), described above. At Screening, impairment while working ranged from 0% to 90%. A decrease in percent impairment indicates improvement.
From Screening to Week 16
Percent Activity Impairment Due to Psoriasis
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16
Percent impairment in regular activities was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), described above. At Screening, activity impairment due to psoriasis ranged from 0% to 90%.
From Screening to Week 16
Sleep Problems Index II
Time Frame: From Screening to Week 16
Sleep Problems Index of the Sleep Scale from the Medical Outcomes Study reflects sleep disturbance, perceived sleep adequacy, daytime somnolence, and awakening short of breath or with headache. Participant rates each item from "none of the time" to "all of the time" for the previous 4 weeks. Scores are transformed to 0 to 100 scale; lower scores indicate less impairment. Decrease in score indicates improvement.
From Screening to Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Martin M Okun, M.D., Ph.D., Abbott

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 12, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on adalimumab

Subscribe