Systemic Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis in Adults: Update of the French Guidelines

Systemic Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis in Adults: Update of the French Guidelines Using Delphi Consensus Statement

French guidelines on the use of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults have been developed by the psoriasis research group of the French Society of Dermatology using literature available until July 2017 (Amatore et al, 2019). Because several systemic treatments have been marketed since then, new guidelines are mandatory. The aim of this study coordinated by the Centre of Evidence of the French Society of Dermatology is to update the available French guidelines using a Delphi method.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Justification of Delphi methodology

The Delphi method has been widely used for elaboration of guidelines. The goal of the Delphi method is to solicit group opinion and to combine the opinion of a panel of experts into a consensus (or dissensus). During a Delphi study, multiple rounds of questionnaires are sent to a panel of experts with feedback between rounds, allowing experts to re-evaluate their responses along with the replies of other experts.

Design, expert eligibility and data collection A steering committee of members of the French Centre of Evidence (G. Chaby, F. Corgibet, L. Fardet, S. Leducq, F. Poizeau https://reco.sfdermato.org/fr/centre-de-preuves-en-dermatologie) and members of the Psoriasis Research Group of the French Society of Dermatology (M. Chastagner, L. Gouillon), without any competing interest regarding this topic, will be in charge with elaboration and conduction of the Delphi study.

The selected experts will be asked whether they agree to participate in the Delphi survey. Upon acceptance, they will be asked to answer the Delphi study administered using the online survey Welphi®. Before the first round, demographic information (age, sex, location of practice, availability of a phototherapy cabin, public or private practice) and competing interests will be collected. All experts will provide informed consent. Experts will have 2 weeks to complete the online survey with two email reminders. For each round, the number of experts who completed the surveys will be documented.

Procedure

Definition of consensus For statements with responses on an ordinal 7-point Likert scale (rating 1, strongly disagree to 7 strongly agree), 'agreement' will be defined as a score of 5-7, 'neutral' by a score of 4 and 'disagreement' by a score of 1-3. Consensus will be defined as achieved when > 70% experts will vote for a given option on the Likert scale. For Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs), consensus will be defined as achieved if > 70% experts voted for a particular option. Median and interquartile range (IQR) will be used to describe the central tendency and dispersion of responses: a "strong statement" will be defined as a median score of ≥ 6 or ≤ 2 on the Likert scale and 90% votes for MCQs. If consensus is not reached for one question (using Likert scale or MCQ) after 3 rounds, dissensus is acted. For this study, four rounds are planned, including round 1 with open-ended questions (see below) and a maximum of three rounds to obtain consensus.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Members of the Centre of Evidence (M. Beylot-Barry, G. Chaby, O. Chosidow, F. Corgibet, L. Fardet, B. Guillot, N. Jouan, D. Jullien) will propose a list of 40 to 50 French dermatologists experts in the field of psoriasis. Members of the scientific committees of the psoriasis research group (French Society of Dermatology) and "Resopso" will be included in the list of experts, with the exception of those participating of the design and publication of the present study.

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • French dermatologists
  • public and private practice practitioners
  • members of the French Society of Dermatology
  • expertise in the field of psoriasis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Update of the French guidelines by consensus using participating experts opinions
Time Frame: 15 days to complete the online survey for each round

Round 1 will include

  • 3 questions using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale, regarding every systemic treatment that could be prescribed as a first, second or subsequent line, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis without contra-indication to any treatment
  • 9 questions using an ordinal 7-point Likert scale, regarding first line therapeutic management of particular forms of psoriasis
  • 11 open-ended questions for special indications of each therapeutic agent.

Round 2, 3 and 4 Experts will be asked to review the questionnaire based on the information provided in the former round. They will have to re-rate the 12 questions using the 7-point Likert scales. Regarding special indications for each therapeutic agent, expert's comments from round 1 will be synthesized and converted into MCQs for subsequent rounds. If consensus is reached for one question, the question will not reappear in subsequent rounds.

15 days to complete the online survey for each round

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on Experts consensus

3
Subscribe